Borderline IN(F/T)P Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
I don't know what you consider a world builder but ESTJs, ISTJs, ISTPs and ESTPs have had a huge impact on society improvement, achievement and overall developement. So we either eliminate the idea of N being more creative (I wouldn't be opossed to this) or we follow with the rest of types and we see whether it plays a role or not. I consider myself INTP and have gotten INFJ (a few times when I younger. One could argue the same gender distintion with the rest of letters, maybe being the most 'masculine' the ISTP and the most 'feminine' the ENFJ I agree with that to a certain extent, but I think T/F is the dichotomy where gender really has to be taken into account. It's a different system with differently defined functions than MBTI, though. And the other point you tried to make is also wrong because creativity has nothing to do with T/F ; it is only linked to S/N because being focused on possibilities rather than sensorial data makes you imagine things. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Borderline IN(F/T)P likely is!. What I meant is that one specific interpretation someone might have today about types, even assuming it makes more sense, is not useful, since if it differs greatly from the source and what's accepted, we would be just using a different system from what most people understand as MBTI. And while it's easier to find Feelers in art and Thinkers in science (Please, someone name 5 INFPs mathmaticians and 5 ENTJ poets) it's true that both types are using creativity for different purposes, argument that can also be applied to Sensors. If we part from the premise that N types are more creative we should consider how the rest would play a role. Same, I guessINxP that use their inferior functions too much and struggle. How can be ISFPs so artístic if they don't have N. How can INFPs be as creative as ENFPs if their Ne is not dominant. Again, why are there so many Feelers happier on artístic fields and so many Thinkers in scientific. INTP philosophers are a great example of thinkers being creative, especially within the realm of metaphysics. Nobody should believe the myth of the brain side is scientific if they have bothered to read the rest of the text. Well, I haven't seen his videos, so I can't judge him. I've even seen a small portion of INFPs who have considered themselves to be Type 5 as well (I find that to be interesting). Believing N is the end all of creativity is such a common mistake. Intuitives are great at combining ideas (Ne) or developing ideas (Ni) but generating the idea from nowhere that's F territory. Or INFJs stronger Ni than INTJs. Now they start to believe they are INxP. Yes, I've seen many cases of INTPs who consider themselves borderline INFP and viceversa. Scientists themselves also use and need a lot of creativity to things like creating hypothesis, I’d say realms like physics and mathematics definitely require creativity too. You could say INTPs creativity is restricted by their adherence to their still internal logic, but, at the same time, INFPs aren’t people who draw their creativity from nothing. One thing that I'd like to add, is that if feelers are perceived as being more prolific in art, it's not due to a superior creative capacity than thinkers, but rather because of their ability and tendency to communicate feelings. So it's a trick for people to differentiate wether which side they relate the most. You did fine on mentioning it's a myth, just did wrong in the rest. You most likely won't regret it. Sure anyone can be a youtuber as anyone can be a writer but some writers are worthy. However, if someone is sure to be an intuitive and have and east time coming with new stuff but not that good understanding rational matters or is great with rational matters but not that good with creative endeavours that rule could be the answer. They do share Ne and Si. That's certainly not the case. Your definition of creativity doesn't make N users more creative than Sensors because as creativity is required to NT to make theories it's also required for STs to find ways to do their practical jobs.
. You made a good point of people identifying with both types. And of course, thinkers can be artists and feelers can be philosophers, I’d say they are even capable of becoming scientists. You might just want to consider that according to your definition nobody would be more creative than nobody, nor intuitives nor sensors. So, you did well saying the sides of the brain are a myth (thing that I knew perfectly when I wrote the first message) but badly done for not having bothered to read, understand and for believing an 'ad hominem' like 'open a neuroscience book' was a right argument in any case. For the INTP Ne follows what consider to make sense', this is way they are the worst listeners according to Nardi. That's so wrong. It's just F helps as much with Creativity as N does if not more. You dont need my life story but basically when I thought I was an INP this is how I figured out I was T rather than F. And I would be okay with that, I would agree each type uses their own creativity and each type uses their own rationality and then no type is more creative nor more rational than any other type. Same with Zeego, Khel and Scotty from what we talked. Why do ENFPs seem to have a stronger Ne than ENTPs. Why so many feelers excel at creative fields. Even ESTJs finding new tasks to be done would be creativity. It's the Feeling part. To find out what your MBTI personality type is you need to complete the MBTI questionnaire and take part in a feedback session from a qualified MBTI practitioner.. He's not the base for my messy arguments so you don't have to think he is bad. Now, seriously, I meant it as a rule of thumb. Interestingly, INFP is the only INxx type that I have never received on a test. and both can be Type 9. I don’t know where you are getting the “inspiration” part of feelers from. Claiming it's because of "inferior functions" and we "struggle" it's ridiculous. My main characteristics were always Introversion and iNtuition, both when I typed INTx or INFP. They are filtering information. I disagree with the second part. Not sure if you are into the cognitive function explanation, but Ti and Fi can look really similar and this can be a reason for confusion. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. This personality type is highly individualistic and Champions strive toward creating their own methods, looks, actions, habits, and ideas!. The thing about Feelers that they are following an internal or external inspiration (Fi vs Fe if you believe in functions, Lynch vs Chaplin for example) while T types seem to follow their own rules 'This works' or 'This makes sense'. It's not that it's stronger it's just the part Feeling plays on creativity. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Borderline IN(F/T)P' belongs to!. One thing to note is that INTj in Socionics is Ti-Ne. Part of my point is that feelings also play a role on creativity, but whatever, I don't want to argue forever. If you search for most creative people on this web you will probably find INFPs at the top. They are bound to feelings and value, and are in their case limited by the need of having harmony with their own personal values. A lot of what is considered Fi and Fe is related to the stereotype of the right side while Ti and Te is related to the left. I got some good points from you so thank you for having a proper argument. Not to mention you may lead people to believe this left brain = logical thingy is right. I have a hard time believing that the so rational INTP is going to come with so many crazy ideas as an INFP. now not so much) and INTJ. If I saw a work of raw creativity I would probably think of dominant intuitive types (at least if we go by Jung descriptions), but I wouldn’t be able to decide between thinking or feeling, unless we had more information. Or the ISTP have such a natural skill as the ISFP for composing music. This may be controversial but I would argue that if you find your self between those types and you are really not any of the other types you are more likely to be an INFP who values certain INTP characteristics than the other way around. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Borderline IN(F/T)P? What about enneagram and other personality types?. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Borderline IN(F/T)P MBTI type.. I wouldn’t say a philosopher capable of imagining a world outside of what we see is less creative than an artist. Michael Pierce described Fi as the most subconsciouss function of all, even more than Ni. And that would be perfectly fine. But if you are being partial on being N types more creative then you are saying certain types are more creative and then I will have to counter argue that that rule also applies to feelers because. The Fi dom user knows 'that's the right thing to do' which brings a whole world of creative choices not límited by consciousness. Poets, for example, draw (in many cases) inspiration not from raw creativity but from their feelings, or the moods or sensations they perceive in things. INTJs are interested in ideas and theories when observing the world.. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of MBTI characters list.. While being a rational function it's also using inferior Te in the way Ni uses inferior Se but instead of bringing perceptions it brings choices.
. But if they do like you and jump to conclussions before reading and understanding, then they will have the problem. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Thank you for providing an answer without using any part of the brain. If you logic is not based off a moral or value judgement and implemented with the goal of seeing it though, then you are probably using Ti and not Fi. You seem to understimate the rol F plays on creativity and only believe intuitives are the creative ones. N helps as does F, even if it was just by not being costrained by T. I'm afraid this whole "left hemisphere = cold logic and facts = ST" and "right hemisphere = creativity and emotions = NF" doesnt make any sense. A Fi dom can literally bring creativity from nothing. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. A rule of thumb is a simple generalitation that is not accurate but should work for the most part. That is why all world builders are no sensors. I'm defining creativity as the skill to bring something new. Well, tell me which types you would expect them to be more creative field and which ones in a more rational one. I will dismiss the rule. Sure, both can do both and be great at it but why is there such preference. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Borderline IN(F/T)P Myers-Briggs and personality type!. not really Kawaii_tha_marten. The reason is that if you are narrowing your view for the sake of accuracy or usefulness you obviously are going to consider less options. Michael Pierce is a really good one, give him a chance. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. I mistyped as INFP a couple years ago because I was emotionally unhealthy at the time, not to mention youngereven now though I only have a slight/moderate (60-70%) preference for thinkingcognitive functions have typed me INTP every time (except for the socionics test where I scored INTj) and I've asked a couple people who both said that I am probably INTP but I still can't be sure A rule of thumb is when something one says is so broad you can"t apply it to every situation however what you said is wrong in any situation therefore it is not a rule of thumb. About "sensors not being world builders". And there are certainly highly creative sensors, Enya for example (ISFP) and even thinker sensors like Picasso. If It wasn't the case INFPs shouldn't be as creative as ENFPs. But I will ditch it ait anyway for the sake of accuracy and practicality. INTPs seem to be Ti by default, while Fi may value and develope and identity similar to a Ti dom. If feelers are perceived as being more creative I don’t think it’s because of any inherent characteristics but, rather, by bad stereotyping. So F types seem to be less constrained by rules and more driven by inspiration. The brain is a much more complicated structure than what you think it is, please open a neuroscience book. Dittopffffft Does your reasoning and logic flow from an initial moral conviction or not. Less information brings less possible combinations which makes them more suitable for fields where some innovation is required but isn't as important as understanding how it works while the Fi user should be better at fields where they have to be innovative but are required to follow less rules. You might have an INFP mathmatician and an INTP poet but for the most part the INTP will identify himself more with hard logic and the INFP with creativity.
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!