Galileo Galilei Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
I don't think Galileo is definitely not an ENTJ but I think the Galileo legend depicts him being quite a bit more forceful than he actual was. A theory is only rejected for its logical fallacy and not necessarily the lack of empirical evidence. Ok the E is definitely clear. Considering his boisterous personality and focus on empiricism, ENTJ seems the best choice. That's at least what I've heard from an interview with William's widow, tho I can see this romanticized notion of death by terminal depression became widespread. Now Galileo is the father of modern, data driven science where theories are subjected to empirical tests. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. Sadly typology is falsifiable and the best we can do is look for the best fit possible in difficult cases. So yes the theory while totally logical and solid still lacked empirical verification much later. ENTJs are empiricists above all else but can be philosophical if it fits in with data and evidence and frequently use data and evidence in an idea-oriented manner. Using empirical data doesn't even make you an empiricist, and in the famous Pisa tower case, the origin of his idea came from the theoretical and he used an improvised experiment to demonstrate/test it. I still think ENTP makes more sense but in the sense that he was more of a knowledge chaser than a dream chaserI said interaction style. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. It was actually empirical observations which changed Einstein's mind, when he wasn't swayed by theory. No INTP would make an illogical theory. We have to use some sort of generalities here, using exceptions as an argument for NTP wouldn't help. That's true to an extent.
. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Galileo Galilei' belongs to!. Jung's students. That Galileo tried to produce empirical evidence demonstrates nothing about his personality. If you disagree that Galileo wasn't an empiricist or wasn't trying to prove a tangible base for a theory or that he ushered an era of observatory science than I guess it would become one of those long nonsensical discussion that we both have a knack for getting into ;)Also like an ENTP who would start alot of projects and fail to finish quite a few of them, Galileo seems a bit too focused to empirically prove Corpernicus' (an INT_) theory. So in Jungian sense Te is associated with aforementioned qualities. Galileo to me is seeking proof of abstract theories and that seems to be his driving force his life. Also why can't an ENTJ interact with people. It's funny you would use Einstein's handling of relativity as a point of reference because Einstein himself said the Theory of Relativity itself was a "theory of principle" and he prized the security of its foundation in empirically observable facts. Scientists would accept empirical evidence and you proved my point, Einstein was concerned with the theory and took no interest in evidence of the theory because the theory made sense. Comes across as someone on a mission. Well you are right to some extent. That is showing that the academic environment respected empirical studies as proof of theory. That is not showing a preference for empricism. He's beaming more pain from the eyes than Robin Williams in 2014 That’s pretty dark. This whole idea of trying to determine functions from whether or not someone is "empirical" is nonsense. org/news/2014-02-einstein-conversion-static-universe. ENTP can be a lot more impulsive in floating out new, untested theories when Ne is left partially unchecked by Ti. Only after conclusive evidence was presented that he agreed to fine tune his theories. An NTJ would more readily accept a theory if it does make observable, experiment-able sense. They do have auxiliary Ni, after all. So we have to base typing of that to some degree, otherwise there is no way to disprove that Galileo is an ESFP scientist and his time and circumstances forced him to form his work around empiricism. Also you said its non-sense to argue for a particular function on basis of his use of evidence. Relied on observations and empiricism more than theory. Ti-Ni loop would be for ISTP and its based on research on Von Franz and Van Der Hoop. Correction: No INTP scientist, especially a genius like Einstein would make an illogical theory. For example, a lot of people are typed as INFJ with "Ti-Ni" loop here who would be an INTP according to Myers-Briggs. Te-Se looped ENTJs would be more wholly unphilosophical. There was more oscar credit for him as opposed to DiCaprio, just for how well he fooled everyone that he was all hunky dory right up until visiting the ropes aisle in Walmart Because he had to put up with the people's ignorance of his time. I liked Impeccable's comment by accident. People aren't robots who are utterly incapable of seeing things a certain way. Furthermore, a lot of Galileo's contributions were focused on empirical aspects of science i. @Ventus: You're correct but I didn't mean ENTJs can't be philosophers, its more like their way around things is less on abstract ideas and more on use of facts. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Galileo Galilei MBTI type.. There shouldn't be a standard when dealing with behaviors which can easily be environmentally-induced, because that is not indicative of personality. Okay I'l try again. For example, of the three big Greek philosophers, Aristotle, an ENTJ, was the most scientific. Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with.. Could you elaborate on his interests that ENTJ consider pointless. The way he lived seems to be more of an ENTP but his philosophy could be seen as more ENTJ. Static universe the logical position held bybthe scientists before Hubble's discovery. It then moves to the theory thats in line with empiricism. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. I also think MBTI both helped and ruined Jung's work. About Einstein, I fully disagree. It's absurd to assume that NTJs don't like science given that there are tons and tons of such scientists. He seems to have loved interacting with people, and definitely not in the way that an ENTJ would. If you treat Jung's word as word of God, then please vote Newton as ISTJ. I can see both ENTJ and ENTP although not INTP. However for posterity's sake where you say "ENTJ. However if you insist that Ti-Ne is indeed the all encompassing duo which can be abstract and empirical, singular and multi-faceted at the same time then sure, in that "definition" of things it might make sense. MBTI is over simplification of Jung but its the only possible way about it no matter how flawed it is. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. That's beside the point. My point was that it was unfounded at his time and while his INTP sorted out the theories and equations, he was more inclined towards empirical verification of those theories and thus a Te-Se type in shape of an ENTJ and not an ENTP. His theory kept us interested much more than later more scientific models. A more stereotypical scientific theorist would have made case for NTP. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. The words of Einstein would have come much later in his life because as to inception of the idea its well known that its attributed to Einstein's supreme genius and his use of imagination in his head. is the most non-philosophical empirical type" I assume you meant most non-philosophical empirical NT. Te is indeed concerned with logical structures in the external world and are more concerned with evidence than with mere intellectual necessity. But as you can see it wasn't actually logical and he closed his mind off to those even who applied his theory of relativity to a dynamic universe. MAGNIFICOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. And the whole "seeking proof of abstract theories" was in Galileo's case quite the scientific priority because people were actually believing that the Earth was the center of the solar system without that strong, empirical proof. I can't type out much now but in response to "if you insist that Ti-Ne is indeed the all encompassing duo which can be abstract and empirical, singular and multi-faceted at the same time" yes, yes it can. Please read Jung's explanation of Te. Einstein believed in and theorized about a static universe until 1931, which is dead wrong. :)I gotta say something on this one: requiring empirical evidence crystallized after Galileo, and he was not necessarily a champion of the concept (read some Helge Kragh or Ian Hacking). Data and evidence is of utmost importance to an ENTJ, which is the most non-philosophical empirical type. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Galileo Galilei Myers-Briggs and personality type!. So can Te + Ni. This is ridiculous. But he focused a lot of time on things that ENTJ may consider pointless. Ofcourse even though the basis of Einstein's theory was his own personal genius, he knew how the universe was and worked on his theory to make actual sense. Circumstances and personality both determine actions. I would agree with its lack of being a hard science. I ask for empirical evidence in certain contexts but I've never heard of anyone thinking I was an INTJ. I for one don't believe in total scientific validity of the system merely because typing is not falsifiable but if we have to indulge in this fun there needs to be some sort of structure otherwise these discussions are futile. Te relies on facts, data, evidence. I don''t personally see what Aristotle is not an INTJ but that's a different topic for a different day. @impeccable: Great points. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Galileo Galilei likely is!. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Galileo Galilei? What about enneagram and other personality types?. On a side note, remember when Einstein put forward his theory of relativity, it was devoid of any experimentations or observations but rather pure intellectual logical argument which beautifully explained the working of the universe, it was way later that its tangible observations were observed. For example: Pioneering of the scientific method, the Tower of Pisa experiment, development of the telescope. The tendency in Galileo is that of Te over Ti and I presume he is an Ni type given his dogged interest in the subject. A theory is worthless if it has little practical implications. It does actually. First and foremost, any scientist of any type would use scientific methods in their research and work but we'll look at the preferences shown. But Jung's whole definition of Te revolves around how it seeks empirical evidence, how it looks for evidence in the environment etc etc. g Aristotle was more of a political scientist than a pure philosopher etc. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of People of Science characters list.. Didn't he end himself because of a life debilitating dementia. I agree with ENTJ given that his attitude towards learning was Aristotelian (Not to be confused with Aristotelian view of universe, which he rejected in favour of Copernicus)Well if we are going to have this discussion over Galileo's type, which is atleast we can agree between ENTP and ENTJ, what makes people think he is an ENTP over an ENTJ. I think that was my original point - empirical evidence was loved by the scientific community and continues to be. Who chose this photo. Ti relies in theory and only use facts if they corroborate. MBTI is a Jungian system which runs on Jung's concepts however flawed they might be. This personality type is highly individualistic and Champions strive toward creating their own methods, looks, actions, habits, and ideas!. Ironically though, it was Ti left partially unchecked by Ne which led to Einstein's advocacy for the static universe. Anyway if there's a debate it should be ENTP vs INTP. Again every scientist has a job to look for evidence in his/her research. Regardless of external factors. I'd merely mentioned Einstein for argument's sake earlier. Also I agree with your take of Ne. The dominant Te doesn't really like "for science" as an excuse without something more tangible behind it. In that case sure. While Copernicus was the genius who brought the theory of Heliocentrism with his Ti, Galileo was the obnoxious ass who stubborn believed in the Empiricism of science that he was willing to get thrown in Jail. There is no two ways around it. But the conclusion is the same: the ENTJ typing should find corroboration elsewhere. in the end, Jung's concepts were psuedoscientific theory which were translated into something which at least had backing in empirical data in MBTI. All subsequent scientists followed this regardless of their types. Also since his theory was rigorously tried and tested and challenged till it achieved the status it has today: "The theory of universe"I was just using Einstein words* typing is not falsifiable. That he was using empirical data in his experiments does not indicate a J or P, especially because the empirical data directly ties into the theoretical. He could be an ENTP by one explanation, an ESFJ by another and and ISFP by yet another. If you don't give a crap about what Jung say and our little discussion is based on what you feel about the typing system with any objective standard than spare me. So there should be no standard.
. So does EVERY scientist. Even if Galileo wasn't as forceful as his image is, his overwhelming influence and work does point to empirical inquiries of science and reliance of observation to prove a theory. But you'll give one thing to Jung. Any NT would be likely to do something similar. So I meant it generally. His theory of relativity is his pure personal genius which was unsubstantiated empirically for quite a while and since it wasn't founded on evidence it took time to get acceptance and was only accepted later with observable discoveries. The situation demanded empiricism. I'm going with ENTJ on this one. Forceful views and very determined to put them across. ENTP all the way. Also the four letters of MBTI were short hand for cognitive functions themselves. Most NTPs would accept a theory if it makes logical sense and consistency regardless of its evidence. *see how this Figaro. Forgot what i read at the time but I seem to remember coming to the conclusion that he's definitely an NTP. Well it's difficult to say what the environment was back then but ENTJ generally aren't that concerned with scientific methodology and the like, as long as it makes sense. Anyway I'm saying Galileo was ENTP not INTP. Its absurd that while you use a Jungian typology system while disapproving Jung's definition of its basis. I think Jung work is more insightful than scientific in nature. But it's fun trying to reconcile the two models which is really why I post hereMBTI is based on Jung's concepts but not Jung's concepts themselves. I was specifically saying ENTJ.