George R.R. Martin Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
His approach is amoral, objective and don't give a fuck about "value" or "ethic". Stupid INTP vote from people who think "he is an INFP he can't make story that violent". A "cynical" INFP would be an INFP who manage to change his nature. Imo there is genuine indignation here, from his side. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about George R.R. Martin MBTI type.. This is also why I don't feel his sense of tragedy is necessary Fi either, because it's somewhat heavy handed, not that an INFP tragedy couldn't be, but it would still have a feeling of being profoundly personal. He was clearly an INTP. " Are you sure. INFPs seem to love creating crapsack worlds because of this, they don't let their Fi sit still. What is the best option for the MBTI type of George R.R. Martin? What about enneagram and other personality types?. So, based on interviews with him and how he talks about his work, I would propose that he's an INTP who understood the importance of characters, knew what to take from history, knew what to take from Shakespeare, and made some great story out of it. If the narrative calls for a death, then any good writer would kill a character off, no matter what type they are. Game of Thrones = obvious inferior Te just like LotR, both are studies of the ridiculousness of power. It's like SF with a romantic edge, that deals with issues about human nature, reviewers of Song for Lya write about how the story had a profound effect on them. Characters and their personalities dominate the story over all else or did you miss that bit. K ROwling is oversensitive even for an INFP(she is ISFJ in fact)We know that in see his writing styleFi-dom are the most oversensitive types, especially for this kind of matter. I intentionally commented on Pullman even if I didn't have any interest in him, and made an entry for another author just to see your opinions on Martin (was that dishonest of me. Seeing him this was, as a professional entertainer as much as an artist, I think his Fi holds up much better. I realized that for him to write those many characters and plot directions and still have his world make sense could be explained by Ti logic in constructing his world. This is not so much as a strong argument for INTP, as INFP could do this as well, it's just seems to me that his analysis of human nature is more dispassionate than I would expect from a Fi-dom. The thing isn't that it's violent. :)I actually think he's a good example of an INFP with Te well-integrated. it's quite laughable. That's a pretty weak argument.
. Seeing him INFP makes allot of sense as well, when you think that his main heroes are: a dwarf, a 'bastard' (someone ostracized for the circumstances he was born in), a girl who defies gender norms and her royal status, another young woman who was the victim of her brother, a woman ostracized for how she looks, a cripple etc. Finally I think GRRM is as much a craftsman as he is an artist. The only ones to compete are Fe-dom, but they are sensitive in a different way. I could give more reasons for INFP, but I'm starting to get the feeling that continuing to argue after there is enough arguments just increases the chance I will say something that can be used as grounds for disagreement. which is where the melancholy comes in, I suppose. It's more about the way he keeps so many characters and story lines and still have his world make sense that made me think he could be Ti. The way the story is moving, and in light of clues fans have picked up on over the years (especially the whole Jon Snow/Daenerys connection), I think it's just going to keep getting more and more like a conventional fairy tale. '' This way of seeing history seems more Fi-Te, while Ti-Fe would more likely downplay the role of specific individuals in favor of social factors. Final note: If you pick up any INTJ writer (Brandon Sanderson, Steven Erikson or even Thomas Mann) characters are still pretty bare-bones and awkward in comparison, and INTP-GRRM is supposed to have achieved this with nearly all the weight on his Inferior function. I'm interested with character development and personality, often more than anything else in a story. :P And Marcel Proust absolutely does not believe in the power of (romantic) love. Actually, Game of Thrones as a whole, very much uses history as it's back-ground. It's like he was indulging in this tendency. I don't see where those people see an auxiliary Te user in interview. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. If they didn't have any logic in their stories then they'd make pretty trash writers but they aren't. But INTP can write tragic and sad stories too. It's not really until the auxiliary function (with INFJs and ISFJs) you start to get something that looks like the characterization and psychology he never fails to deliver on. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. ASoIaF is extremely heavy on characters and absolutely exceptional in that department for its genre. But there's always been something in a twilight that moves me, and a sunset speaks to me in a way that no sunrise ever has. From example, s/he believes that Nabokov is an INTP, and in that case it would be of an example who understand that what makes great fiction great is the beauty of style, the aesthetic of beautiful writing something INTPs struggle with, yet Nabokov manage to do accomplish such a task. Ok, thèses quotes convince me. Probably more people than not would say, "Yeah, I would kill someone else's child to save my own child, even if that other child was innocent. But okay, I feel like the general direction of the story is very "wounded Fi". :DI'm pretty sure he has Ne, but Ti or Fi is a question. but i think J. " They say, "Well, I'm not a bad guy – I wouldn't kill. If Martin is not like this, what do you have that he is a Feeler. They're not as idealistic and moody as you make out, that's stereotypical bullshit. That NTP, not NFP. '' Sound like favoring Feeling over Ti -historical process didn't interested him, he saw it in terms of the humans. com/tv/news/george-r-r-martin-the-rolling-stone-interview-20140423. Being interested with characters and personality has noting to do with being an F. "As for F authors crushing your dreams, it's not like he's the first one. I still wonder why Quentyn Martell's trip needed to be so described in detail like that. I think this is one point where we often disagree on, where you're like, "An INFP would never be this *evil*. '' He seems more like a Thinker trying to understanding the issue that comes when values and practical sense come into play. It's not the violence or the insensitivity of the books of that makes me think he's an INTP, it's the cynicism. The characters are like pawns. I would pick Dying of Light before any Game of Thrones book. LotR is more fairy-tale like because of 9w1, GoT is more nihilistic because of 5w4. Remember, George R. Some of them (Borges) just straight out avoid it, probably for the better. Only an INTP like G. One of the most famous INFP novels, Wuthering Heights, is literally about an unhappy couple taking their frustration out on everyone around them, to the point of ruining the lives of the innocent children of people who wronged them. Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with.. For people who have time to read: his SF stories seems so much more interesting than his Game of Thrones series. "And still, George RR Martin's approach is very rational. ''I don't know if this is a matter of artistic influences so much as it is of temperament. ''I am still a believer in the now unfashionable "heroic" school, which says that history is shaped by individual men and women and the choices that they make, by deeds glorious and terrible. One could be forgiven for thinking that the point of the novels is to refute the existence of morality. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. All his universe works as a mechanical system, this is not an empathic point of view. So I've asked people who do have children, "Well, what would you do in Jaime's situation. lol suppressed Se, as if sex and violence in the imagination or on paper has to do with Se. I just sort of realized INTPs can have a sense of juvenile romanticism despite heir logic mind-set, haven't read his books but someone who read said that he explains the characters thoughts and the emotional aspect is situational, which would be more Ti-Fe, but I'm not sure. "once idealized fantastic worlds become worlds filled with death and destruction" That's actually how A Song of Fire and Ice starts actually = The Long Summer turning into Winter is coming, Lord of the Rings has that same theme. I hope he would manage to bring back that philosophical edge and creativity in the series, because it would really make excellent television. ) or suppressed Se because of all the sex and violence, but that sounds silly to me. To quote #butterfly: ''They will usually analyze what they do (be it fantasy or literary fiction) and try to carefully construct a perfect example of it (Pynchon, Nabokov, China Miéville) where each part plays into the whole. You obviously have a skewed view of INFPs, they're quite accepting of the world as crapsack. He doesn't give a shit. Fi in championing their ideal, will go for a yes and Fi as a failed idealist will go for a no. It's too funky and fluid, just like his characteristics :)INxP in any case, Ne writing process and plots going in all driections+Si level of detail. I would like to see what #Butterfly has to say about his. If Bran tells King Robert he's going to kill you and your sister-lover, and your three children. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. are you just voting 5w4 because his books are quite bleak and nihilistic. He does nt care if at the end the good guy win or lose. Too many contemporary Fantasy writers take the easy way out by externalizing the struggle. He goes a lot into the emotions of the characters in the books even more than the action. It's such a harsh, clinical treatment of it. For him, it seems a more pragmatical approach, not very emotionally intense, this is for example from an interview: ''Remember, Jaime isn't just trying to kill Bran because he's an annoying little kid. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. I was debating between 5w6 and 6w5. And as a result, we might never read the real end of the story. They sound like the kind of SF stories I would write. Actually my INFP friend acts very much like him. He seems so jolly, light -hearted and friendly. Te is looking at things with impersonal eyes, and the idea of his books "anyone can die" is such a striking and harsh Te (which weirdly doesn't happen in Te-doms). He believes in heroes and individuals who try to make the world a better place, this is also Fi. They're dreamers but they fully accept that their dream world is not real and like to explore that theme. He's a nerd who concepted a world, and in the most cynical and the most logcal way possble. Compared to fantasy or even stories in general, he is trying to show us what the world is actually like, perhaps even going a bit too far in his enthusiasm to recognize all the grittiness and meaningless tragedy. If you take a step back, at the end of the day you still have a noble knight, so absurdly loyal that it's heartbreaking; or the brave, little group of children traveling to the edge of the world by themselves to fulfill some mysterious, magical prophecy. I should read other works of Martin to find out. Would you type me as a Feeler. They might study character writing as much as they want, there is just something very stilted and artificial about their characterizations. to be good at creating character has absolutelu nothing to do with being an F. But Martin is not like that. htm Some INFP-ish quotes, This sounds Fi: 1)''The battle between good and evil is a legitimate theme for a Fantasy (or for any work of fiction, for that matter), but in real life that battle is fought chiefly in the individual human heart. I changed my vote. I don't know she cry for that. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding George R.R. Martin Myers-Briggs and personality type!. You tastement is "he likes to create character, so he is an F. Does Martin has that. I agree, he's xNFP but could probably be an ENFP. That's just the spirit of the series. I mean an INFP would know it's values, but due to Ne he would like to explore other people's values as well, as if everyone has a personal system of values and through imagination you could try to see how much can you see the world through other eyes while still be in touch with your own values, enjoying the emotional tension this process gives. Martin is not a writer from the 16th century, he has a wealth of classic literature at his disposal, from Shakespeare to Dumas, plenty literary examples where he could understood what to take in order to make his books great. But they don't do it for the sake of sadness. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. It adds flavor, and opens up opportunities for character development and emotional scenes (that INFPs live for). At the same time, he's an idealist. In fact, I'm reticent to read them, because they seem too similar with I would put down on paper if I seriously start writing. In other words, Ti/Fe can be very idealistic in another way, by believing that if A can learn then B can learn too. ;}INFPs are as uselessly idealistic as you make out to be Speed Gavroche. Emile Zola was a stereotypical INTP (probably very close to Martin in regards to type also) and he knew how to develop his character as well. He owuld be moody, dispressed, dispaointed that the world does"nt work in an affectiive and ethical way like, as INFP, he would wish the world rock. That's how the game of thrones works. Then all non-INTP writers only write stuff with rainbows and care bears I guess. I don't really think it's fair to compare him to literary writers who often invest so much of their own lives into their works. Why the 5w4 votes. He's also something of dick towards his fans. '' So his cynism and pessimism comes from being an romantic and seeing the other, bleak side of it. Well, INTJ is more possible than INTP in my opinion but still I don't think his writing is Ni style. I would call it ironic more than tragic anyway. INFP 5w4 makes sense in this light. But Romanticism has its dark side, as any Romantic soon discovers. '' Couldn't you say then that Martin is an example of an INTP who understood that what makes great writing great is the complexity of characters, and so he managed to create the most perfect example he could of that. they thought they were invincible but they aren't. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type George R.R. Martin likely is!. You said it yourself: He lived centuries ago, the world was a different place. "Only an INTP like G. Bran has seen something that is basically a death sentence for Jaime, for Cersei, and their children – their three actual children. " These are the difficult decisions people make, and they're worth examining. I think Fi is more about depth and strength of feeling as well as inner conviction than what it stands for. " As revered he is as a deconstructionist of fantasy, I think he is also underrated as a reconstructionist. Some people on PersonalityCafe say INTJ because dur dur symbolism (. If it is logic that the good guy win, he will win, if it is logic that he loose, he loose. I don't think the point of ASoIaF is that fantasy is stupid, but it's about giving the pleasures of fairy tales, the hope and heroism, weight by putting it in a world where it might actually all be for naught. ENFPs don't have that which is why they seem a lot more idealistic. ''; //2)''Historical processes have never much interested me, but history is full of stories, full of triumph and tragedy and battles won and lost. And I always found him very Ti-Si, delving in the details (while INFP with Si are more prone to delve into feelings), describing a lot of things for no reason.
. Proust portrays it like an illness. It is the people who speak to me, the men and women who once lived and loved and dreamed and grieved, just as we do. But he doesn't create character in an affective way but in a logical way. I don't know, but some tragic twists aren't enough to convince me of being Fi. uk/nonfiction/intgrrm. And still, George RR Martin's approach is very rational. Martin would kill important characters for the sake of narrative coherence. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'George R.R. Martin' belongs to!. All his universe works as a mechanical system, this is not an empathic point of view. It's that it's somehow insensitive. As an INFP I don't feel relate to him so much. The MBTI questionnaire sorts people into one of 16 different personality types.. Lol, you are almost as evil as me. I coud almost tye him as ENTP. oh well, let's say The Red Wedding wasn't that bad. In addition, he's much more interested in realistic political machinations than the average fantasy writer; or really any fantasy writer. there's absolutely not argument in favor of INFP. I watched many interviews to see if I ever can identify with this guy enough, and I always find something off with INFP. Part 2:While it's true that he excels at creating characters that aren't black and white, he seems to me that he gets this more from an analysis of history more than his personal impressions. Martin would kill important characters for the sake of narrative coherence. He's not a moody cynical INFP, but an emotionally stable cynical INTP. Could also be 6w5 or maybe, maybe, maybe (but unlikely) 5w6. So I'm really interested in hearing your arguments here. That guy has nothinng idealist. INFPs also tend to like stories with tragic, sad elements. i would like to remember you there is a famous INFP named homer who make "the Lliad" and "the Odyssey" centuries before Martin born. "Arya,Tyrion and john emotionnal development does not matter for you. What matters for him is logic. Writing had disappeared in Greece when he was alive. Watcj the show, read teh bok, and read interviews. I know it seems kinda disappointing from me, but I would be open for INTP now. It took me a year to recover from "Swann in Love", lol. And INTP aren't robots, they can analyse personality well. And INFP HAVE a hard time to accept that the world don't match their values. He simply know that the world is not ethic and don't care, acctually making fun of his eadalist characters to put them in trouble. Because as I've said "being interested with carachters" is not. "How does anything make sense if this is possible. I don't really see an Ne-dom adding as much detail and depth as he does. Yeah, I've never seen/read Game of Thrones nor know much about this person, but the argument that INFPs wouldn't kill off important characters is ridiculous. he is clearly focused on tragedy it's really FiHomer andd odyssey was singing i mean we see that how the words are used in the songs ==> transcription in book follow precisly thisSo everyone who puts tragedies in their stories is automatically a feeler. // 3)''I was always intensely Romantic, even when I was too young to understand what that meant. "==> Shakespeare INFP :)@Dan : What. He got interested in fantasy through fanzines and comic books, wrote episodes of cheap television for a living for years, etc. I think it's more fair to compare him to someone like Stephen Colbert. And that would not be without some difficulties. He's friendly sure, but somehow he never seems that personal, it's more of a projected kind of warmth that could be a really developed inferior Fe, rather than the more deeply felt yet somehow un-expressive Fi. Then many of them hesitate. The first known transcriptions of his stories were written ~2 centuries later. Fi/Te on the other hand, is like an isolated world of 'is one special or not'. I think because NFs and literature are so often seen together, people wildly overestimate INTP writers abilities to write good characters. Sure if he deals with the human element very well and it shines, something that INTPs tend to struggle with, yet he excels at it, but I think it's more of a issue of: how. INFP would put meaning into it, processing the mourning (think of Robin Hobb, a true INFP fantasy writer) while with George Martin, it's often more like "Ha. You'd think Ti-dom is impersonal, but they're not, they just don't have anything to do with personal ideals, and Ti connects with Fe which means it believes in collective consciousness. How do we know Homer was INFP, though. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. No one crushes your soul better than someone who believes in the power of love. '' Seems like a Fi temperament. , faking interest in other authors just to see you argue about another. page=3 It seems from interview, that it's a more pragmatical way of looking at things. And the level of detail to make the world plausible is characteristic of tertiary Si writers. Shakespeare was a blood thirsty author if there was one, Victor Hugo with all his idealism and brotherly love could crush your soul and he imagined Frolo one twisted fuck, and there's Dumas, who wrote ''Regent's Daughter'' a novel who builds a sense of romantic optimism and then at the end. Oh and I meant "INFPs aren't as uselessly idealistic" before, typo. Yes I find that INFPs have a morbid fascination almost like they constantly like to tease their Fi with their inferior. Hey, even when I disagree with you, I still find you one of the top most interesting typist on the site. All INTP writers (Inferior Fe) I know for sure just write atrocious characters. Yeah, story evolving in all kinds of directions even tough it should have driven into a conclusion far by now. Compared to JK Rowling who cried all night after killing S**, the contrast is pretty strong. It's precisely because his Ti allow him to understand human nature in a cynical and objective way that he is good at this.
George R.R. Martin
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!