George R.R. Martin Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
I realized that for him to write those many characters and plot directions and still have his world make sense could be explained by Ti logic in constructing his world. It's more about the way he keeps so many characters and story lines and still have his world make sense that made me think he could be Ti. Remember, George R. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. To quote #butterfly: ''They will usually analyze what they do (be it fantasy or literary fiction) and try to carefully construct a perfect example of it (Pynchon, Nabokov, China Miéville) where each part plays into the whole. But he doesn't create character in an affective way but in a logical way. I intentionally commented on Pullman even if I didn't have any interest in him, and made an entry for another author just to see your opinions on Martin (was that dishonest of me. I think because NFs and literature are so often seen together, people wildly overestimate INTP writers abilities to write good characters. It's not really until the auxiliary function (with INFJs and ISFJs) you start to get something that looks like the characterization and psychology he never fails to deliver on. I think Fi is more about depth and strength of feeling as well as inner conviction than what it stands for. Being interested with characters and personality has noting to do with being an F. But Romanticism has its dark side, as any Romantic soon discovers. But Martin is not like that. Characters and their personalities dominate the story over all else or did you miss that bit. So I've asked people who do have children, "Well, what would you do in Jaime's situation. He owuld be moody, dispressed, dispaointed that the world does"nt work in an affectiive and ethical way like, as INFP, he would wish the world rock. '' Sound like favoring Feeling over Ti -historical process didn't interested him, he saw it in terms of the humans. " These are the difficult decisions people make, and they're worth examining. Because as I've said "being interested with carachters" is not. It's precisely because his Ti allow him to understand human nature in a cynical and objective way that he is good at this. Compared to fantasy or even stories in general, he is trying to show us what the world is actually like, perhaps even going a bit too far in his enthusiasm to recognize all the grittiness and meaningless tragedy. From example, s/he believes that Nabokov is an INTP, and in that case it would be of an example who understand that what makes great fiction great is the beauty of style, the aesthetic of beautiful writing something INTPs struggle with, yet Nabokov manage to do accomplish such a task. I don't really think it's fair to compare him to literary writers who often invest so much of their own lives into their works. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Probably more people than not would say, "Yeah, I would kill someone else's child to save my own child, even if that other child was innocent. It took me a year to recover from "Swann in Love", lol. '' Couldn't you say then that Martin is an example of an INTP who understood that what makes great writing great is the complexity of characters, and so he managed to create the most perfect example he could of that. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type George R.R. Martin likely is!. A "cynical" INFP would be an INFP who manage to change his nature. Fi in championing their ideal, will go for a yes and Fi as a failed idealist will go for a no. Then many of them hesitate. page=3 It seems from interview, that it's a more pragmatical way of looking at things. Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with.. htm Some INFP-ish quotes, This sounds Fi: 1)''The battle between good and evil is a legitimate theme for a Fantasy (or for any work of fiction, for that matter), but in real life that battle is fought chiefly in the individual human heart. But there's always been something in a twilight that moves me, and a sunset speaks to me in a way that no sunrise ever has. Proust portrays it like an illness. You obviously have a skewed view of INFPs, they're quite accepting of the world as crapsack.
. ''; //2)''Historical processes have never much interested me, but history is full of stories, full of triumph and tragedy and battles won and lost. Yeah, story evolving in all kinds of directions even tough it should have driven into a conclusion far by now. Does Martin has that. That NTP, not NFP. I mean an INFP would know it's values, but due to Ne he would like to explore other people's values as well, as if everyone has a personal system of values and through imagination you could try to see how much can you see the world through other eyes while still be in touch with your own values, enjoying the emotional tension this process gives. So, based on interviews with him and how he talks about his work, I would propose that he's an INTP who understood the importance of characters, knew what to take from history, knew what to take from Shakespeare, and made some great story out of it. Watcj the show, read teh bok, and read interviews. I don't think the point of ASoIaF is that fantasy is stupid, but it's about giving the pleasures of fairy tales, the hope and heroism, weight by putting it in a world where it might actually all be for naught. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding George R.R. Martin Myers-Briggs and personality type!. It's too funky and fluid, just like his characteristics :)INxP in any case, Ne writing process and plots going in all driections+Si level of detail. I don't really see an Ne-dom adding as much detail and depth as he does. And the level of detail to make the world plausible is characteristic of tertiary Si writers. I know it seems kinda disappointing from me, but I would be open for INTP now. Lol, you are almost as evil as me. I would like to see what #Butterfly has to say about his. Well, INTJ is more possible than INTP in my opinion but still I don't think his writing is Ni style. It's such a harsh, clinical treatment of it. ASoIaF is extremely heavy on characters and absolutely exceptional in that department for its genre. The way the story is moving, and in light of clues fans have picked up on over the years (especially the whole Jon Snow/Daenerys connection), I think it's just going to keep getting more and more like a conventional fairy tale. Some of them (Borges) just straight out avoid it, probably for the better. Seeing him INFP makes allot of sense as well, when you think that his main heroes are: a dwarf, a 'bastard' (someone ostracized for the circumstances he was born in), a girl who defies gender norms and her royal status, another young woman who was the victim of her brother, a woman ostracized for how she looks, a cripple etc. Finally I think GRRM is as much a craftsman as he is an artist. ENFPs don't have that which is why they seem a lot more idealistic. Oh and I meant "INFPs aren't as uselessly idealistic" before, typo. there's absolutely not argument in favor of INFP. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. It is the people who speak to me, the men and women who once lived and loved and dreamed and grieved, just as we do. "once idealized fantastic worlds become worlds filled with death and destruction" That's actually how A Song of Fire and Ice starts actually = The Long Summer turning into Winter is coming, Lord of the Rings has that same theme. I don't know, but some tragic twists aren't enough to convince me of being Fi. If you take a step back, at the end of the day you still have a noble knight, so absurdly loyal that it's heartbreaking; or the brave, little group of children traveling to the edge of the world by themselves to fulfill some mysterious, magical prophecy. Actually my INFP friend acts very much like him. What matters for him is logic. to be good at creating character has absolutelu nothing to do with being an F. ;}INFPs are as uselessly idealistic as you make out to be Speed Gavroche. Bran has seen something that is basically a death sentence for Jaime, for Cersei, and their children – their three actual children. This is also why I don't feel his sense of tragedy is necessary Fi either, because it's somewhat heavy handed, not that an INFP tragedy couldn't be, but it would still have a feeling of being profoundly personal. His approach is amoral, objective and don't give a fuck about "value" or "ethic". In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'George R.R. Martin' belongs to!. He simply know that the world is not ethic and don't care, acctually making fun of his eadalist characters to put them in trouble. Shakespeare was a blood thirsty author if there was one, Victor Hugo with all his idealism and brotherly love could crush your soul and he imagined Frolo one twisted fuck, and there's Dumas, who wrote ''Regent's Daughter'' a novel who builds a sense of romantic optimism and then at the end. lol suppressed Se, as if sex and violence in the imagination or on paper has to do with Se. He goes a lot into the emotions of the characters in the books even more than the action. That guy has nothinng idealist. In other words, Ti/Fe can be very idealistic in another way, by believing that if A can learn then B can learn too. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about George R.R. Martin MBTI type.. Seeing him this was, as a professional entertainer as much as an artist, I think his Fi holds up much better. uk/nonfiction/intgrrm.
. I think it's more fair to compare him to someone like Stephen Colbert. For him, it seems a more pragmatical approach, not very emotionally intense, this is for example from an interview: ''Remember, Jaime isn't just trying to kill Bran because he's an annoying little kid. You'd think Ti-dom is impersonal, but they're not, they just don't have anything to do with personal ideals, and Ti connects with Fe which means it believes in collective consciousness. I watched many interviews to see if I ever can identify with this guy enough, and I always find something off with INFP. Loyal to their peers and to their internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. Detached and analytical, they excel at finding solutions to practical problems.. Yes I find that INFPs have a morbid fascination almost like they constantly like to tease their Fi with their inferior. At the same time, he's an idealist. No one crushes your soul better than someone who believes in the power of love. All INTP writers (Inferior Fe) I know for sure just write atrocious characters. which is where the melancholy comes in, I suppose. I just sort of realized INTPs can have a sense of juvenile romanticism despite heir logic mind-set, haven't read his books but someone who read said that he explains the characters thoughts and the emotional aspect is situational, which would be more Ti-Fe, but I'm not sure. He seems so jolly, light -hearted and friendly. ) or suppressed Se because of all the sex and violence, but that sounds silly to me. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. ''I am still a believer in the now unfashionable "heroic" school, which says that history is shaped by individual men and women and the choices that they make, by deeds glorious and terrible. Ok, thèses quotes convince me. One of the most famous INFP novels, Wuthering Heights, is literally about an unhappy couple taking their frustration out on everyone around them, to the point of ruining the lives of the innocent children of people who wronged them. Some people on PersonalityCafe say INTJ because dur dur symbolism (. // 3)''I was always intensely Romantic, even when I was too young to understand what that meant. I'm interested with character development and personality, often more than anything else in a story. Too many contemporary Fantasy writers take the easy way out by externalizing the struggle. He's not a moody cynical INFP, but an emotionally stable cynical INTP. " Are you sure. I hope he would manage to bring back that philosophical edge and creativity in the series, because it would really make excellent television. You tastement is "he likes to create character, so he is an F. And INFP HAVE a hard time to accept that the world don't match their values. INTJs are interested in ideas and theories when observing the world.. He's friendly sure, but somehow he never seems that personal, it's more of a projected kind of warmth that could be a really developed inferior Fe, rather than the more deeply felt yet somehow un-expressive Fi. Actually, Game of Thrones as a whole, very much uses history as it's back-ground. He does nt care if at the end the good guy win or lose. com/tv/news/george-r-r-martin-the-rolling-stone-interview-20140423. I coud almost tye him as ENTP. Part 2:While it's true that he excels at creating characters that aren't black and white, he seems to me that he gets this more from an analysis of history more than his personal impressions. Sure if he deals with the human element very well and it shines, something that INTPs tend to struggle with, yet he excels at it, but I think it's more of a issue of: how. Martin is not a writer from the 16th century, he has a wealth of classic literature at his disposal, from Shakespeare to Dumas, plenty literary examples where he could understood what to take in order to make his books great. Imo there is genuine indignation here, from his side. As an INFP I don't feel relate to him so much. Fi/Te on the other hand, is like an isolated world of 'is one special or not'. I changed my vote. oh well, let's say The Red Wedding wasn't that bad. '' This way of seeing history seems more Fi-Te, while Ti-Fe would more likely downplay the role of specific individuals in favor of social factors. They're not as idealistic and moody as you make out, that's stereotypical bullshit. , faking interest in other authors just to see you argue about another. INFP 5w4 makes sense in this light. Hey, even when I disagree with you, I still find you one of the top most interesting typist on the site. For people who have time to read: his SF stories seems so much more interesting than his Game of Thrones series. '' He seems more like a Thinker trying to understanding the issue that comes when values and practical sense come into play. :)I actually think he's a good example of an INFP with Te well-integrated. I don't see where those people see an auxiliary Te user in interview. :DI'm pretty sure he has Ne, but Ti or Fi is a question. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. But okay, I feel like the general direction of the story is very "wounded Fi". He was clearly an INTP. INFPs seem to love creating crapsack worlds because of this, they don't let their Fi sit still. '' Seems like a Fi temperament. If they didn't have any logic in their stories then they'd make pretty trash writers but they aren't. He got interested in fantasy through fanzines and comic books, wrote episodes of cheap television for a living for years, etc. Final note: If you pick up any INTJ writer (Brandon Sanderson, Steven Erikson or even Thomas Mann) characters are still pretty bare-bones and awkward in comparison, and INTP-GRRM is supposed to have achieved this with nearly all the weight on his Inferior function. What is the best option for the MBTI type of George R.R. Martin? What about enneagram and other personality types?. '' So his cynism and pessimism comes from being an romantic and seeing the other, bleak side of it. If Martin is not like this, what do you have that he is a Feeler. ''I don't know if this is a matter of artistic influences so much as it is of temperament. I could give more reasons for INFP, but I'm starting to get the feeling that continuing to argue after there is enough arguments just increases the chance I will say something that can be used as grounds for disagreement. In fact, I'm reticent to read them, because they seem too similar with I would put down on paper if I seriously start writing. I think this is one point where we often disagree on, where you're like, "An INFP would never be this *evil*. It's like SF with a romantic edge, that deals with issues about human nature, reviewers of Song for Lya write about how the story had a profound effect on them. :P And Marcel Proust absolutely does not believe in the power of (romantic) love. They might study character writing as much as they want, there is just something very stilted and artificial about their characterizations. Te is looking at things with impersonal eyes, and the idea of his books "anyone can die" is such a striking and harsh Te (which weirdly doesn't happen in Te-doms). He's a nerd who concepted a world, and in the most cynical and the most logcal way possble. Would you type me as a Feeler. "How does anything make sense if this is possible. This is not so much as a strong argument for INTP, as INFP could do this as well, it's just seems to me that his analysis of human nature is more dispassionate than I would expect from a Fi-dom. So I'm really interested in hearing your arguments here. He believes in heroes and individuals who try to make the world a better place, this is also Fi. And that would not be without some difficulties. " They say, "Well, I'm not a bad guy – I wouldn't kill. I would pick Dying of Light before any Game of Thrones book. If it is logic that the good guy win, he will win, if it is logic that he loose, he loose. I agree, he's xNFP but could probably be an ENFP. " As revered he is as a deconstructionist of fantasy, I think he is also underrated as a reconstructionist. They sound like the kind of SF stories I would write. They're dreamers but they fully accept that their dream world is not real and like to explore that theme. If Bran tells King Robert he's going to kill you and your sister-lover, and your three children. "As for F authors crushing your dreams, it's not like he's the first one.