Sign Up | Log in |

Hannibal Barca Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info

Hannibal Barca MBTI personality type cover chart

''Anyway, it's likely that his decision had more to do with military advantages or disavantages, than more 'human' motivations like 'lack of ambition' which he had plenty. I have voted ENTJ but Hannibal was a pretty unusual general. But I think any J type fits to a degree. Him not wanting to take Rome it's something Robb Stark (STJ) would do, even Stannis Baratheon if taking Rome is not one's destiny. I would be interested in hearing an argument for both types. I'd agree, there's no reason he has to be a NTJ. Reading stuff on the internet, it seems like the easiest answer would be ''because he couldn't''. (Roman army had been devastated). Defeating Romans many times was also great, but after that what. Haven't voted yet. I could be wrong. Free in-depth and practical information on the 16 personality types, including careers and relationships.. Rome had sea control, so, the most direct way of attacking them (with boats) wasnt conceivable. 4- Hannibal was alien to Roman land and had few national support, much weaker to rule over the empire. Also, alot of his strategic and tactical play was unknown to that world, it was new, daring and ingenious but not in an Alexander ESTP way imo. What he did later was class generalship and innovative strategy. Case in which, it's possible that while his army was specialized at things other armies were capable, when it came to open field attack at such a scale, his army might have lost its advantage, and it was better to be contented with whatever he won till then than risk being defeated. We'll never know why he did what he did. An STJ would take great care in scouting unknown territory and putting his men in unknown dangers, as well as keeping supplying lines intact, and put a lot of focus on logistics whereas Hannibal was rather rash in some on his decisions. I've seen Alexander typed as INTP and INTJ on those forums. 3- Hannibal didn't want the local barbarians to insult Rome for personal experience over their alliance and technical problems he learned over time. It's because they try to chew more than they can, while for Hannibal it's the lack of ambition that strikes one. He set to fulfill his duty, but ignore the big picture. 5- Hannibal defeat and force to leave Italy was natural as a result of foriegn land invasion, any modern army today would face the same problems and oppositions forced to withdraw like the American forces from Iraq despite their victory to invade. Thanks, I voted back ENTJ because strategy+tactics and what you said, I guess him not taking Rome will remain one of histories biggest dilemmas. With this way, he could provide to his troups enough food (one elephant could carry food for an entire carthagian's legion), in addition to the food the native tribes i mentioned before gave to them. As for logistics, invading Italy through the Alps was the best if not the only means.

. While the romans progressed alot during all these years, Carthaginians knew crucial defeats with their armies scattered throughout their territories by Hannibal, the same Hannibal who didn't take any good decision and came back to Carthage after he was finally ordered to. The rest of the story we all know it. Also attacking mainland Italy through land was his overly ambitious yet ingenious idea, something never undertaken by anyone before. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. From what I gather, part of why Hannibal was so sucesfull is because his army could fought in conditions of terrain other armies were incapacitated. Overall I think ENTJ because people comment how strong he was on tactics, not just strategy. He ultimately wandered through Italy during an entire decade with no initiative at all. Is it because he was an INTJ and he couldn't make a prompt decision to take advantage of an inviting situation. His intentions for invading Rome were primarily based on avenging his father's defeat in the First Punic War. Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for extraverts and interior for introverts.. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Hannibal Barca' belongs to!. However, it's only an hypothesis with no factual evidence (in fact, most of Hannibal's moves don't have evidence to explain them so it's up to who study it to choose the most logical hypothesis). 1- Hannibal was frustrated with the way the Barbarians behaves and that is not the way to realize the modern world by replacing modernity with barbarism. I guess his general Maharbal commented about how he could fetch a victory but not use it. It's highly probable that Italy's invasion through the alps was considered for a long time, historians arguing that it may be Hamilcar (Hannibal's father) idea, but Hannibal was the one who implemented it. I think INTJ is very plausible, because we have two great INTJ strategists in Sun Tzu and Alcibiades. One addition: While Alexander was known to improvise and used to make quick decisions, Hannibal was far more cautious and took his time planning ahead even he would decide on thing all alone. This was a mission impossible without a large population from homeland of Carthage. Or could it be an ENTJ's inferior Fi. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. Hannibal as INTJ really doesn't fit since Ni-doms are the most forward thinkers, specially INTJ who also have the common sense Te to Ni vision. 2- Hannibal understood that his men were good in the open field and had no men left and tools for big city as Rome, urban war was risky to take without the proper units. I don't know what his type is but there is alot going on. He first asked for military support to his brother but when the latter got intercepted and killed, Hannibal failed to adapt consequently. v=T89ugOHxcscIn fact Hannibal's travel through the alps wasnt that risky. If none exists I'd assume ENTJ because I assume by default that military commanders have decent Se, but that's a flawed point and I'm open to INTJ arguments too. A once in a lifetime strategist and an equally efficient tactician. I am divided between ENTJ and INTJ but I would tentatively side with ENTJ. He had scouting reports and had agreements with native tribes in order to have guides, meals and more soldiers to add to his army. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Hannibal Barca likely is!. But after defeating Romans in three crushing encounters, he refused to take Rome which was ripe for the taking. More so, a good portion of his army was added after he set out for Rome - during his encounter with the tribes of Gaul. What made his strenght was his tactical and diplomatic abilities, but he was a poor strategist. Of course, who knows his motivation, but as such INTJ seems more like a case of people just wanting to have a bad-ass INTJ on their side, and ESTJ isn't out of the question. Maybe the fact that he'd often plan and decide all alone points to introversion. He had the opportunity to take Rome itself but he hesitated and roamed the peninsula for years. He doesn't seem to show the cautious approach of an Si type in my opinion (I could be wrong). I have very little direction of his type actually since we know alot about his history but not sufficient about the person himself. I've just found this documentary on him that i think is interesting and quite original (well Total War fans like me should appreciate :P - its in 5 parts i think the 4 others can be seen in the suggestions to the right instead of pasting all 5 links here) : https://www. I'm pretty sure he's not a SP given the contrast with Alexander and I'd cross off NP as well for similar reasons. However these two were not exactly as good with tactics as Hannibal was. Can anyone explain Hannibal's reluctance to take Rome after Cannae. He relied on strategic maneuvering and excellent use of on field tacticians. Perhaps someone who voted can explain his/her reasoning. INTJ appears to be the standard typing on the forums but that says nothing. I see Ni approach which makes plans in leaps while forgoing the details, like Hannibal did. The reason why Hannibal didnt attack Rome after his 3 victories isn't really what matters here (i also think that it was because of not having necessary military capacities to attack - him asking to his brother Hasdrubal to join him should be proof of that). He also seem to be a gifted diplomat given how he united so many tribes and mercenaries under his banner. What really matters is : he engaged himself in some enterprise with no clear outcome. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. First, the path wasn't really unknown for him and he prepared it to make sure not to engage his troups into some impossible mission. Hannibal's goal was to humiliate Romans in the battle and not necessarily take over Rome, he did achieve his goal in Cannae and perhaps didn't know what he wanted to do next. I can perfectly see ESTJ for him, or at least ENTJ with not so developed Ni but INTJ is out of the topic here. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Hannibal Barca Myers-Briggs and personality type!. If someone has anything to add to this, please do. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Hannibal Barca? What about enneagram and other personality types?. If they fail, it's because their plans are overtly idealistic, or ignore factual data at hand, not because they ignore what will happen in the future like that. INFPs, like most introverts, are quiet and reserved. They prefer not to talk about themselves.. Yes, attacking Rome was great (and contrary to the first punic war, Rome would deal with war in his own territories). He used new and innovative army formations to defeat better armed and trained Roman armies. He had no clear aim after inflicting Romans with massive defeats. At the same time he was very innovative as well so maybe he was an ESTJ with very strong Ne, yet his Si stopped him from taking the necessary steps forward. But then he lost his way. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Politicans and Leaders characters list.. These victorious battles would be more successful in the Cartheginian land. It could have been the demise of Rome. I am actually open to non intuitive type for him. Don't take what I wrote below too seriously, sometimes I just add stuff I have no real knowledge about in order to make the discussion continue. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Hannibal Barca MBTI type..

. I would say ENTJ. But after all that he doesn't appear to have a tangible aim of attacking Rome. For example this are some reasons someone posted on a forum:''Hannibal lack for urban experienced fighters was the major hult to invade Rome city itself, here are many major reasons:.

Hannibal Barca
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server, so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!

MBTI enneagram type of Hannibal Barca Realm:

Category: Politicans and Leaders

Log in to add a comment.

Comments

Sort (descending) by: Date posted | Most voted