Jean-Paul Sartre Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
Hm, I can't seem to be able to write my mind anymore :/Exactly, and Sartre's authenticity sounds more of the Ti one than some tertiary Fi. But if you prefer to see tertiary Fi behind all he says and writes. The whole book shows us how to make the moral decision through pure logic, by purely theoretizing and comparing his theory to all the other ones, making his the "most logic". His whole intellectual career is based on theory, from Being and Nothingness to Critique of Dialectical Reason. He's not relying on social systems, well he has inferior Fe. " I don't know if that's convincing ^^His philosophy is indeed boring. What I see in those interviews is that you can't understand a thing he says, you would have to know all his books. And his writings overcomplicated, I mean you just have to read the title of his books to know it will be a laborious and useless reading. Sartre is more of a theorician, a context/particular situation thinker (Ti>Ne), guided by pure logical consistency (he bitched about how this book wasn't representative of the whole theory because he had to vulgarize it, he even regretted its publication. Why not type him as INFP, it would make more sense. To me it's all theory first in him, we are all "condemned to be free", whatever our choices are, we can't escape from this "truth".
. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. And I'm trying to see what nuance you seem to see that I don't but I think you'll have to explain it to me. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. An NTJ tells you what you should do and how because it's the right thing to do, Sartre theorizes why you are free to do whatever you want to do. INTJ with an extra dash of eccentricity from all the fun amphetamines he was using :). It's the humanism part that's dispensable. "Hell is other people", etc. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Jean-Paul Sartre likely is!. And I don't see why personnal responsability and authenticity can't be Ti. Ji-types (P-types) seeks authenticity, while Je-types (J-types) seeks rightnessboth Ji functions seeks authenticity : logical for Ti and ethical for Fi (the "properly" authenticity in casual language)There are so much TPs are seen as FPs or NJs because they do art. He keeps using hypotheticals, and even him is always repeating what he says and re-explaining it, there's no clear and concise Te, nothing concrete and no pragmatism. (si tert) values his country and can be detail oriented@moolfreet. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. I don't see the same thing you see in that quote, or at least I can't see why it's more INTJ than INTP. And anyone who denies this theory is either a coward or bastards who hides behind "deterministic excuses". What is the best option for the MBTI type of Jean-Paul Sartre? What about enneagram and other personality types?. Isabel Briggs Myers, a researcher and practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed to see the judging-perceiving relationship as a fourth dichotomy influencing personality type.. And now I know only INTJs are destined for great things. Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with.. Domineering and dogged, thus making INFP unlikely. Well it's the whole point of his theory. "Hell is other people" probably isn't coming from someone relying to heavily on Fe and probably not an extrovert. To me it is Ti dominant > inferior Fe to the bone and I thought I would tell you because, even though it only repeats what I wrote before, I know you firmly believe Kant is an INTP so I thought this parallel might convince you ^^ They're the same kind of guys, and just by looking up at Kant's works/essays/books he fits perfectly in the INTP theoretician category in which I put Sartre. It's sooo easy to "see" Fi in art, you can't think it's a real argument (even if tertiary function was a thing). I would think comparing him to the creator of the opposite theory (Spinoza and his determinism) is more useful than Kierkegaard (whom I don't know^^). an INFP can seem put action above authenticity, but actually he puts action (Te) to serve authenticity (Fi), thus INFP keeps likely for sartre. excellent argument, my vote goes to INTPINTJ in Ni-Fi loop, just like Heidegger is INFJ in Ni-Ti loop. (te aux) action oriented , his philosy is all about our precedent action. He fights others purely on a theoretical point of view. If anything I think it's more representative of de Beauvoir, it sounds very XNFJ (foreseeing and believing in human potential) I don't understand why you think him having a moral reasonning can only come from Fi, it's clearly purely logic based. To use your own words : Ti is also independant judgement. (ne aux) he make a lot of work about language. "He sets to prove a conviction, not a theory" What makes you think that. Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for extraverts and interior for introverts.. who overcomplexifies everything. And he doesn't rely on cause-effect explenations of behaviour either. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Jean-Paul Sartre Myers-Briggs and personality type!. (fi dom) all his work is about our own subjectivity and our authenticity. That you're not determined. If sartre seems more oriented towards action than Kierkegaard is, it's because of his enneatype 5, more acting and reality-focused than the 4 oneIn "Existencialism is a Humanism" what he's basically saying is that we face an infinity of possibilities and no guidance (Ne) from which we must choose a path through our own individual (introverted) judgement : in his case it looks like Ti given than he opposes it to every form of interpersonnal influence/dependance. And for him it's pure logic. Existence precedes essence is a Ne concept : Sartre faces the anguish of being left alone with no guidance (NP) and has to give it meaning through actions (whatever they may be, staying home is political to him, a choice/action) those actions have to come from your independant judgement (Ti) you have to pierce a way through with your own reasons. globally, sartre's philosophy sounds very Ji-ish imoHis convictions come from his theory, which is based on logical consistency>all. ) Also the whole "absurd/excentric" way of seeing things in this philosophy screams of Ne. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. (fi tertiary)deeply value authenticity. bobnickmad : I don't know much about Kant but I just read a short part about him in a book (which has nothing to do with him or MBTI), and it's like reading about Sartre, you just have to switch the names ^^ To sum up : Autonomy of judgement = rationality/reason = liberty/freedom of choice = responsability = "you have to rationaly choose for yourself what is good and what is bad and act accordingly", all of this opposed to : "There are no obligated laws/external principles to follow" and passion/feeling is bad, etc. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Jean-Paul Sartre' belongs to!. What am I missing. They come from dominant Ti judging the superficial personnal interdependance of Fe. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Jean-Paul Sartre MBTI type.. And I thought about something : you wrote before that you type Sartre as INTJ in part because you see him as having a philosophy of action, which sounds Te : to me Sartre values action the same way Kant seems to do : it has to follow the individual/independent and rational judgement of the person (Ti); action stems from moral and rational authenticity and consistency, kind of in the same way as this principle of Kant : "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction. it's only one paragraph but it's all there. this quote sounds very Ti-ish, thus Sartre is maybe an equibrated NTP 5w4. He's the INTP clich. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list..
. A Ni dom wouldn't be that "scientific", would give more intuitive insights and make leaps (Ni) towards what's moral whithout having to theorize it first, would be categorical in his judging (Te) and more pragmatical, oriented towards concrete application and pragmatism. He doesn't set to prove a conviction but a theory, he lets everyone to choose their own conviction and act on it. He says there is no God, and even if there was it doesn't change anything, you're free : so no guidance, no moral code/standard outside the individual (introverted judgement). An INTJ would give insights based on nothing, Sartre explains each step of the reasonning. It's always theory, theory, overcomplicated theory only NTPs will like. INTPs, though sometomes incredibly regimented and determined (Kant, Ben Stein), are rarely domineering. A J would say the opposite ; there IS a right thing to do, even if there's no God, something objective outside the individual (extroverted judgement)Hm, looks like it stops every time right after I write this function :p I'll try not to, see if it works. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. I don't understand what you mean by "wouldn't deal with the existentialist part of it", it's the theory. heiddeger: infp. "A man is no more than a series of undertakings [and] the sum of the organization that constitutes these undertakings. (ni dom )symbolic oriented who put his political views in his books. Spinoza seems like an obvious INFJ.