J.R.R. Tolkien Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
What is the best option for the MBTI type of J.R.R. Tolkien? What about enneagram and other personality types?. Introverted Intuition is all about symbols and abstract ideas and we know Ni is the most abstract of all cognitive functions. Keep your assessments coming :p I like your ideas. To a lesser extent, no way near close to Tolkien, GRR also made Dotrakhi(. Maybe it was a conscious decision. I think Tolkien's aim was to write a fantastical story dealing with the subject he liked, the mythology. What you explained here generally relates to SJs typically. Lewis about writing fantasy was more important to him than actually writing it. Fe is not a behavior; it is a cognitive function. But you're correct that he's a feeler. Lewis who was more focused, rigid, and forceful than he was. INFJ authors usually tend to focus on human society, its complexities and effects on humans and all that interplays and while they might enjoy LOTR very much, it's unlikely they'll create such a broad world and big world, it sounds like unrepressed Ne-Si. and a quick Google search on Tolkien's quotes and ideas will prove that he wasn't as closed minded as you mentioned instead he sought adventure. He also created entire working languages based on the worlds he had created because he was so emotionally attached to his ideas. ] disliked the Narnia series, feeling it was both theologically heavy-handed and artistically slapdash [. Fi types can choose to religious, spiritual and even dogmatic, the only difference is they choose to do so on their own wish instead of societal pressure. If we have to somehow stereotype the things you have mentioned then they only point to SJs (Gross generalisation Btw. Finally Tolkien has that "Fe" Jane Austen/Rowling/Dickens thing where he depicts big parties and gives you a fuzzy feeling in your tummy because it feels like you're a part of a big family for a while, etc. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type J.R.R. Tolkien likely is!. I agree that he seems to have a lot of Si but that too isn't uncharacteristic of many INFP authors. Cognitive functions are not behaviors and can't explain everything. Fi with Ne makes idiosyncratic and imaginative stories like Lord of the Rings. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about J.R.R. Tolkien MBTI type.. Overall, I don't see any strong argument either for Ni-dom or Fi-dom yet, so I'm pretty much lost when it comes to him. That sounds more Ne, not knowing when to stop. And you are totally avoiding Tolkien's emotional involvement with his work. A lot of them play technical board games, etc. I wrote about this in the J. GRRM actually just made up select phrases when he needed them for the plot. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. "I think Si-dom is not impossible for him, when we take into account that studying mythological legends was one of his specialities, and he basically put what he knew inside an idyllic ISxJ like fantasy world. Certainly not an INFP. NJs are purposeful, and NPs more likely to engage in useless endeavors. One thing I feel is important that I forgot to mention: It might very well be very Ne to go, "Hey, I'm going to make my own fictional language. (Fe) That is my *impression* of him. That said I agree with Ventus413. He has reportedly said that his work is important to him more because of his emotional attachment to them than of the idea behind it. Doesn't really work simply because their interests are not similar. Honestly I don't understand why anyone would think he was an INFP aside from the assumption that all fantasy writers are INFP. Lewis is INTJ, because that's not my impression of him at all, but honestly it's been too long since I was into him and I don't feel confident defending my INFP typing. And as you've all been saying there is little Fi in his books. I have to admit I didn't read the previous comments very closely either, but just gave reasons I thought he was an INFJ. I've never read a biography by Tolkien, and I haven't touched his books since my early teens. " On the other hand Tolkien seems to have tempered C. Though I do agree that on a macro level, Fe types are as a whole the most stereotypically kind and sociable. The arguments giving here why C. Quoting an online article: "Tolkien [. ) language and that language (with some help) is also pretty developed. He was routine bond, extremely conservative, and clearly Fe. The thing is that I don't think Tolkien was very passionate about his writing the same way C. Right, I agree. INJs and ISJs don't really fit. Disagreement happens. Lewis's haywire Te and converted him to Christianity (Fe). How does all that explain INFJ. Lewis, who wrote similar stories but was an INTJ: much more focused and forceful. @butterfly, no you're providing an interesting perspective, something worth looking into. And being anti-progress and anti-modernism could just as easily be a result of his inferior Te as it could be a lack of Ne. INTP would be possible, but in some quotes he says that feelings makes more sense than logic for him, so I guess that means he is a Feeler, and therefore a INFJ. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'J.R.R. Tolkien' belongs to!. Loyal to their peers and to their internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. Detached and analytical, they excel at finding solutions to practical problems.. His real life was church, his job, etc. For INFJs ideas come first then social graces. There's nothing you said that wasn't combated below, and your just repeating. Tolkien's genre doesn't allow for overly complex individual characters even though his world is Ne-Si and the man himself is brimming with deep feelings. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. Beliefs, rituals, lifestyle and such sort has nothing and I repeat nothing to do with Jungian types and cognitive functions. Ni-doms are unlikely to create fictional worlds for their own sake, they're more purpose-full. Si-Ne would make most sense, but like Ventus quoted, he put imagination above reality so that doesn't sound like an SJ, who pride themselves with being realists (even when they live in a fantasy world made from myths and tradition, they actually pride with being 'realists'). SJs types are generally more patriotic on average than other types but nothing precludes an INFP to be a patriot, or value tradition (Fi-Si). If he's an INFP, then that could explain why his Si was so strong. To Tolkien it seems to me to mostly have been just a game (Ni+Ti), judging from how slowly he wrote, how little he cared about being published, etc. Fi-Dom, period. None of the evidence you've given proves Fe or a lack of Ne. But maybe it's a Si things as well, Si is more about creating a personal framework of one's life, and since he always dealt with mythology, it eventually came to make up his personal life style so much that he identified with myths as something real in his life. It's not necessary for an INFP with complex psyche to write overly complex characters especially when writing something like LOTR. When their Si is strong, which usually is in many INFP authors they can come up with such elaborations. But like bobnickmad the only thing I am sure of is NeSi, with respect to LOTR. His characters and morality is also rather simple and straightforward for an INFP, clearly derivative of his community's belief and presented with little hesitation or willingness to explore the dark side in any serious manner. Si: excessively detailed writing trump over anything; Fe: his world seem to be about a perfect rural community (the Hobbits) faced with threats to its idylic life-style; Ti: creating an invented language with it's own set of rules. ) getting up in the middle of a church sermon and chastising the priest for talking in English so that the other people in the church can understand. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. I also don't think Tolkien is very Ne. I still see INFP above INFJ. Nothing pinpoints INFJ. Regardless of his MBTI, I think he's enneagram 6. BUT, I just can't in my wildest imagination imagine an INFP (. The problem with comparing Kafka and Poe to Tolkien is they're really not similar in terms of literary style/genre, it's like trying to type George Lucas by comparing his films to David Lynch's. Tolkien is defined by his personal emotional convictions, whimsy, relatively unstructured nature, and vivid, expansive imagination, all of which are more often INFP traits than INFJ traits. *detailed writing prioritized over anything else /I think an ISFJ under the influence of inferior Ne would superficialy resemble an INFP, since they're both IxFx but the unnatural Ne gives superficial NP characteristics. INFJs engage in the general human complexity while INFPs make individual characters with alot of depth and nuance. Quotes are not conclusive to determine one's type but they sure are persuasive. he was patriotic, an opponent to modernism, to freedom of thought, to free will, for divine right of Kings, against technical progress. It's just that Martin is less interested in that. @Ventus413 @impeccable: Convincing arguments. Though Fe types would be more likely to do the things you mentioned, maybe, none of that evidence is direct Fe evidence and certainly is not enough to preclude INFP. And inferior Ne makes little sense given quotes like "a single dream is more powerful than a thousand realities. Just maybe he wanted something big and close to him but yet separate from his own sensitivities. It's even a little mean for a language professor with Fe. Yeah, I see that, the thing is an argument often given against INFP and one that I haven't found any counter-argument for yet, is that his characters are not very complex, they're the good characters and the bad characters (maybe one or two except, but that's the rule) while an INFP would see the bad and good in most and thus write more morally complex characters. The only real issue is like you say his simplification of morality. Fi doms are circumstantially the most creative and "weird/strange" types. This right here is how typology should be discussed. Every person’s preference can be found on a spectrum, so just choose the letter you identify with most.. Kindness and sociability have little to do with Fe specifically, and both Fe and Fi can explain why someone is kind and sociable. Coming back to it, I think in the 4 function model this guy had to be ISFJ: Si-Fe-Ti-Ne. It seems to me like his world is mostly derived from him playing around with myths, old stories, etc. Ugh, he's one of those difficult types. I'm surprised people think C. Plus Ne is evidently there. Though I agree Tolkien was INFP, I disagree with your rationale. '', which goes contrary to the INTPs rational approach to value judgements issues, so I don't see INTP. I would say Tolkien is more INFP because the language he made is for his personal satisfaction than Martin who uses it primarily for plot :pHe wrote 'slowly' because every time he should have given the book for publishing already, he wanted to add something more to it. His personality was anti-Ne. I wouldn't count out INTP though. His ideas are also heavily based on mythology and history (interests that suggest Fe in the first place) rather than Ne. While ISTJ would be my second choice as he exhibits both strong Fi and Si, I don't see how one could justify either Te-aux or inferior Ne for him. Just because right now I am disagreeing with you doesn't mean you aren't right. whats the rationale behind it. Lewis (Fi) was. The only issue is him talking about dreams over reality. What would you say against that. Anyway, the issue with INFJ vs INFP debate is that no one gave a convincing argument either for Ni-dom or Fi-dom. More likely an INFJ, with strongs SFJ leanings. And yes Tolkien is an INFP based on his emotional conviction and amiable personality however what defines INFPs along with their strong emotional convictions is their intrinsic strength of creating such worlds with such strong imaginations. How does all that explain INFJ. Tolkien mentions that he dislikes allegories. INTP would make more sense than INFJ. Tolkien's imaginary work is very "straightforward" and "solid". Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding J.R.R. Tolkien Myers-Briggs and personality type!. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. You can have fantasy writers of any type. He said he is more concerned with his feelings than gis ideas. Most INFP authors show similar tastes in their fiction writing. is the clear Ni-dom and Tolkien the non-Ni dom. I don't see why inventing languages can't just be Ne, specially when you mention he did those thing just for fun. The fact that he wrote imaginative and idiosyncratic stories is more circumstantial evidence than direct evidence.
. In return Lewis is said to have inspired the talking trees (a very Fi idea). " To sit there for hours, days, months tinkering with made-up grammar and obscure etymologies. And how and why is an INFJ technophobe. None that I ever knew. So I don't see why an INFP fantasy writer can't put that kind of Fi emotionality in his works. Isabel Briggs Myers, a researcher and practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed to see the judging-perceiving relationship as a fourth dichotomy influencing personality type.. I do admit I might be a little out of my water here if you've had a long and detailed discussion already. Function wise, ISFJ make much more sense than either INFP (no Fi-dom characteristics in his writings), INTP (no detached system analyst) or INFJ (detail over abstractions). Te-aux makes little sense when you contrast him with his actual Te-aux contemporary C. From what I understood, he over-does with detail. Maybe because he didn't choose to write a tragic story. I am more interested in why Tolkien wrote what he wrote and his emotional connection with it all. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. Tolkien is an INFP because he exhibited strong emotional convictions and was quiet, kind, and relatively unstructured. Yes and INFPs can appear SJ at times due to their tertiary Si, which further supports that he was INFP, not INFJ. Tolkiens Ne-Si seems to be at work here. He also said that ''Spiritual principles are corrupted by attempts to mechanize and formalize them. I wouldn't expect all INFPs who set out to write fantasy epics to end up writing morally complex character studies in the process, so that's not a definitive point against INFP. (Ni+Ti) Compare him to GRRM or Neil Gaimain's twisting, surprising stories. Ti-heavy hobbies like this are fairly common among INFJs in my experience. INFJs aren't conformists, they just accommodate opposing ideas easily. org/wiki/Dothraki_language#DevelopmentINFPs can be very idiosyncratic and eccentric in their pursuits. That is actually an argument I would use for my perspective. The languages used in the television show were made by professional linguists hired by HBO https://en. So he was INFJ, not INFP. I think having tavern talks with C. I'd have to agree with Ventus413 on this one. The fact that Tolkien doesn't focus on the depth of characters but rather how they play in the mystical world is causing doubts on his INFPness but it is even more unlikely for an INFJ to create a big fictional world just because they love it. Lewis (Fi) was religious after all. Lewis was Ni-dom (heavy symbolic meaning) and Tolkien was not (opposition to anything but ''telling a story''), were far stronger than ''interest in mythology''. Also conservatism and religion isn't just Fe. I pretend to be no authority on his MBTI, lol. Lewis's (INFP) and Tolkien's relationship, which seems to me the typical kind of "hot and cold" relationship this pairing will tend to have. Anyway, I will discuss the points you make against my post. And clearly more Fe than Ne. A Ni-dom would probably have some idea in his mind of the book he wants to write and the way he wants to finish it, and thus be sure that he wrote is good at is without further changes. I wouldn't say that's an argument against INFP though. As for conservatism and religion, I agree. Rowling thread, but I believe Tolkien was INFJ. Ne and Fe are cognitive functions, not behaviors. Yes what is purported to be reasons for INFJ are explained by Fi-Si in an INFP.
. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. But you are right that he was INFP. I also recommend reading about C. INTJs or other types can do the same however it comes naturally to INFPs and ENFPs. I was saying it's not enough evidence alone to make Tolkien unequivocally an xNFP (he seemed pretty certain in his original post). Tolkien was also a man who would would make up fictionalized languages and background stories he wouldn't necessarily use, just for fun. He was too absorbed in the world he made, he was emotionally indulged in it. As for a clear INFP fantasy writer in my mind: Hans Christian Anderson, stories bleeding with tragic/romantic feeling with crazy and unique imagination. I don't think his feeling was suppressed like in INTPs, he was either Fe-aux or strong Fi tertiary, but Fi-dom doesn't really seem like it. As has been mentioned before he was prone to conservatism and elitism. he was very patriotic and sociable, he liked social events and team sports, he was paternalistic and wrote santa claus lettets to his children. It's true, not all INFP are good at writing complex characters, but even than they still try to focus on the internal emotional reactions of the characters (Edgar Allan Poe) or the effect that world has on the character's psyche (Kafka), Tolkien just puts some character in a world and doesn't seem to be about their internal state.
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!