Karl Marx Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
He could still score that I guess but he’s a lot more E and P than other commonly accepted INTJ philosophers. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Karl Marx likely is!. Streamlining an exact plan and following it to the tee without changing is a very TJ thing to do, but he didn't do this. I mostly agree with your MBTI arguments. it's vastly different from someone like Kant or Hegel or Fichte (true IxxJs) who spent their whole lives refining a system of thought. He sure as hell wasn't a sensor. Marx towards his later years actually changed his views on what he thought could occur and began to look towards new possibilities. ) By ni understanding i mean that i think that basically Ni users "pick out" informations that suits their internal needs and that they have in a way already decided what they will expand on and i think that Marx is alot like that. I don’t think Marx wasn’t a formidabble man who clearly made tough judgments, but he bucks the trend of continental philosophers around him by developing other life techniques and using economics to explain curren trends as opposed to extending his system to make up for what he thinks it lacks (something INTJs like Kant and Fichte did until their systems were too big to fail in a way. Marx changed his mind because he had enough Te proof that the revolution would not happen. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Karl Marx' belongs to!. I'm thoroughly impressed by the meta commentary locked within your comment. There's also nothing really Jungian Ti about him. I think calling that Te is ridiculous because many people want to do that and accomplish that in so many ways. karl marx classify the external world on different class who share some caracteristics in common (Te)and said philosophy have interpretate the world (Ti) but have to act on it (Te) once again. You say you don't want mbti typing to get too deterministic but aren't you basically doing the same thing by saying J's can't change their mind, and he changed his mind,therefore he is p. Marxist boyfriends are the best. Because I don't have this Tetrait within my repertoire I'm happy to see it caught in live action. I don’t type by functions. I voted INTP though. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Politicans and Leaders characters list.. I can't really tell if he'd be Jungian Te or Ne. Plus, Marx never really changed his mind, he just basically said that the revolution would happen later if i remember Reality determinism (as is suggested by some comments about the majestical nature of Ni seeing into the future) is what I’m arguing against. I could see him being ENTP in real life. :SWas the ESTP vote a joke. You make it sound as though he magically saw the issues with capitalism, and while his determinism certainly appears and is somewhat J-ish, in a lot of ways what he did was just poke holes in a milicious manner in a system he expected would end via determinantly negating Hegel's philosophy. Ni and Te are the most obvious function in him so he is an NTJ. Also his philosophy seems to use a lot more extroverted intuition, jumping from idea to idea, not fleshing them out, and then moving on. Loyal to their peers and to their internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. Detached and analytical, they excel at finding solutions to practical problems.. I think INTP is a good possibility. Marx said himself he see capitalist and worker instead of human(Te). Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. never said he magically understand capitalism. I have noticed my votes change as well. I don't see the P because i see him as basically using economics not to change his mind but to finally prove in a factual way (te) what he already thinks will happen, that capitalism is going to fail, by what i have read i think that's what he was trying to do. I assume that "don't invent bullshit like ENTx or whatever letter stupidity," is a highly rational (Te) comment that reflects the archetypally consecrated characteristics of "want[ing] to have an impact on the world" sothank you very much my good lad,perhaps I will one day not just gaze solemnly upo my shadow but embody it too. Socialist movements were already around him in Europe as he started to write his philosophy and he saw them as a good bait to latch onto and make use of, which I think on some level points to a sort of extroversion in that he didn't feel like he had to make a personal system of philosophy in isolation. He also created a lot of personas which seemed to just spill over which also feels P-ish to me. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Karl Marx MBTI type.. Most MBTI circlejerks can't really define functions and assume stereotypes associated with certain functions are the be all end all way to define them. Someone changed my INTJ vote to ctINTJ. Except there's nothing very mbti Ni about him.
. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Js can change their mind but by definition we’d assume it to be less than a P would. I might actually switch to it but I’m up in the air. So focused on his personal life and wife and indulgence in delights that also seems a bit anti-J to me. Also maybe 8w7 would make more sense than 8w9 but 5w6 could work too. acting on the world is really just a good marker for extroversion and any ENTx in particular. want to have an impact on the world is mostly a Te thing. I don’t type by functions because I think the arguments can become too abstract and misleading but I think you make good points with your commentary for the letters themselves. It's About looking at clues and being able to determine in which directions things will go. The quintessential Ni dom. Ennegram also should be 8w9 I think. don't invent bullshit like ENTx or whatever letter stupidity. And ultimately he kept revising his perspective little by little to stay relevant. What do you think for ennea. I think “Ni understanding” is very vague and if you’re saying Te is facts based are you not then restricting INTPs from being factual.
. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Karl Marx? What about enneagram and other personality types?. but he see how capitalism will make happen what he want (Ni). I guess he could probably type as an INTP but his focus is so incredibly external. An example where his intuition and theory overwrites their understanding of reality. He took an abstract social philosphy and made it concrete. I think overall that reflects a pretty strong willingness to change with the times (P over J) not because he wanted to be right (if that were his ideal he could have left a strong concetrized philosophy, but he saw this as wasteful), but because he wanted to be a part of something and have an impact. Also, as I said above, he ultiamtely changed his mind about the usefulness of revolution and started to see that maybe capitalism wouldn't fall as deterministically as he thought it would initially. Marx was too experimental and willing to change with the times to be like them. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. He seems super tunnel vision in a way intp probably wouldn't be. He was big into writing poetry and didn't really care for his father's intended career path of him for being a lawyer which is kinda anti-J in that he didn't have a super planned out alternative for a while. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Karl Marx Myers-Briggs and personality type!. he completely relates human behavior to a series of externally driven factors. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. Instead of trying to create an excuse for this, he examined new possibilities, developed a strong interest in economics, and started advocating for other potential possibilities such as the taming in a sense of capitalism. It wasn't like he disappeared into some hill to write a great manifesto on the workings of the human life. it's part of the reason he was able to stay relevant and actually influence the world politically. probably the former, but he comes across as pretty rational. INFPs, like most introverts, are quiet and reserved. They prefer not to talk about themselves.. there's a reason he's generally accepted as ILE in socionics. These TJs and NTPs turn it into a simply checkbox game by mixing it with ennegram and other nonense. he also have a very determinism approach of history this can be also linked to Ni (most of Ni dom sociologist or philosopher like Bourdieu or Spinoza have determinist tendencies). But back to the point I think it seems a bit magical to say a function would just allow him to "see how" something would directly unfold. His philosophy is kinda entirely based upon a series of conjectures based upon extraverted logic. A moody intellectual who, while not in touch with reality, is totally confident of his own visions. @Hermann Inform mods/admin. reading his stuff it's so erratic and his life seems similarly so Karl Marx is focused on one possibility of the future he want to be realised: the revolution of proletariat (Ni) and he see intuitively the capitalism's contradiction who can create this future(Ni one again). Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for extraverts and interior for introverts.. Te is about seeking factual evidence in the concrete world, which is then feeded on Ni framework of understanding. I don’t see him as a super perceiver like a Sartre, but from reading about his personal life and reading his work I see him as more scattered than I’d guess an INTJ would be. *comes across as pretty irrational. You motherfuckers need real Fe types trying to explain MBTI. I also feel like it grounds reality very deterministically to say something like that which is a bit concerning for me because I'm not sure I can personally ascribe to that and I don't think most people involved in MBTI necessarily would either.