Leonardo da Vinci Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
He just took what was given to him and tried to understand it fully. So, ENTP, not INTP. You are an I if you score 49 but an E if you score 51. He's usually typed as a 7. MBTI is a dichotomy because its related to cognitive functions; in this case Ti and Ne. Behavior isn't the deciding factor in Jungian/MBTI typology. I think he's mistyped as extrovert because Da Vinci Code portrayed him as a flamboyant gay. Again, da Vinci was all thinking and no sharing. He was also pretty social with his colleagues and fellow scientists. Fun fact - although it doesn't prove anything, or so -, Kant had it this way:. Why extrovert. ISTJs make perfect scientists. Well MBTI is a dichotomy and using absolute behaviors to link to I or E does make it very black and white when its not. Could be INTP in scottology. I agree that INTJ is the most single minded of the IN types and INTP seeks broader scope. And that's because once you take away that INTP template which basically requires godlike analytical drive, it's pretty clear that he had *nearly* godlike analytical drive. MBTI is basically a 4 factor interpretation of Jung's work, no. By doing so you're rebutting against an absolutist strawman stance which bears no resemblance to my stance whatsoever.
. An INTP wouldn't investigate a subject just to leave it like that. But Da Vinci doesn't stay on that subject for long. Da Vinci has no such primary focus. The way he left so many projects unfinished seems stereotypically Pe-dom. Nah, he went extremely deep in anatomy by the time period's standards whether or not you will ever admit it. The test itself is good for nothin. Back to da Vinci though, how is he an extrovert. Their utmost focus is to clarify ideas. that seems to be a bit of moving the goalposts. Its not so with regards to functions. Everything about his behavior that I can see leads to the conclusion that he was in fact introverted, and if you look at the functions, his Ti use was clearly more prevalent than Ne. Two very different things. The guy was just idea after idea and rarely finished anything. htmI'm never going to vote da Vinci as ENTP, so yeah it's a lost fight, especially when you seem to be going on what he actually accomplished and trying to type that against a near impossible INTP template, rather than trying to get inside his head and how he thought. The fact that no one bothered to delve into the subject for along time is irrelevant here. The second part is circumstantial at best, wouldn't an ENTP do the same if he is commissioned to do multi subject research, I think he was pretty happy with his predicament. A Ji-dom would probably get on his own case more. com/20157-anatomy-drawings-leonardo-da-vinci. And this is the true rule by which those who speculate about the effects of nature must proceed. That is the breadth of subjects. there's nothing 7 about him. As for "multi-field INTP", you seem to think Leibniz is an INTP and he was certainly multi-field. He was also known to be very private with personal matters and not share a whole lot of of his work. "PREFER quiet interaction"Your argument also suggests Ne isn't introspective at all which is an odd assertion. celebritytypes. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. E or I I can't really say, but I lean INTP. Understanding through use of strawmans - what type is that, apparently INTJ. "First I shall do some experiments before I proceed farther, because my intention is to cite experience first and then with reasoning show why such experience is bound to operate in such a way. External input into his mind seemed to be minimal because he'd rather think about stuff he already knew. Great work guys. than reason "Oh, here's one that's even better:. He also lived an extremely private life, doing his best not to challenge social conventions (inferior Fe not Si)How do you differentiate between INTPs and ENTPs in general and respective polymaths specifically. The idea of him having a bunch of vague concepts in his notebooks is not related to 7 or ENTP. An INTP would prefer more time on a subject. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Well they din't know about gravity as well, I guess there were no INTJs as well. While Ne does use its environment for data, it is in the end introspective. I was sheerly arguing in line with Jungian typology, you brought in neo-MBTI stuff which is nothing more than Keirsey's framework. But you mean an ENTP would just experience the subject in a vacuum with attempting to understand it. He's arguably the most Ne person in history. g an ENTP on average would be more intellectually driven than an average ISFP. perfectionism have absolutely nnothnin to do with the J/P dichotomyJs are much more likely to be perfectionists than Ps so that doesn't really support your case. All the well known INTPs have literally been the pioneers and masters of their field. Or whether or not they are aggressive in sharing unfinished ideas or refining and developing their ideas with utmost precision until they are completely satisfied. His interests are way to broad to be an Introvert. You're turning my argument into a black and white dichotomy, when I'm really just speaking of shades of gray. He didn't keep to one topic for long. You seem to be one of the few people here who thinks he is basically an enneagram 5 although you didn't say so, but also ENTP. Ans using your argument when Einstein willfully shared his research he became an ENTP. How can you justify that its both behavioral and a dichotomy at the same time. Also I don't much care for enneagram aspect of typology. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Leonardo da Vinci likely is!. Continuum is more of a Big 5 think because its related to behavior. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Leonardo da Vinci? What about enneagram and other personality types?. there's no sign of him taking in a ton of stuff. No, that's not my argument. developing ideas. So far we have one person saying "cause he's a 7" and another saying "cause he's a polymath", when he's quite clearly a 5 and I don't get the relevance of polymath in E vs I. ENTPs have Ti afterall. I agree his Ti is very polished, it is his auxiliary type afterall but he sure is an Ne Dom. I will say I don't understand the 6 wing though and my guess for enneagram would be 5w4 then 7w8. Let's look at Wikipedia and what they have to say - "The extraverted types learn best by talking and interacting with others. htmlLeibniz gave alot of time and focus to perfect Calculus and his philosophy. They went out and happened to things. Read something he wrote to get a glimpse into his mind (A Treatise on Painting). Lets not waste our energies. But there's nothing in his history which hints at extroversion or Ne-dom. Da Vinci while did research on anatomy wasn't a master in the subject in any sense of word. MBTI's four dichotomies are on a scale, a scale which oddly divides the dichotomies at midway score. I agree though alot of Jung's work was refined by his NTP students van Der Hoop and von Franz. look at what was said in that article. " I would expect an ENTP to be more experiment and less theory. Information processing occurs for introverts as they explore ideas and concepts internally. And his art clearly was from a Ti rather than Ne perspective. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Leonardo da Vinci MBTI type.. Apart from a few sketches what is his contribution tonthe subject. And when you think about it, the surface explorations of topics were a lot due simply to his job and what he was commissioned to do. But because he is a genius even when he is a casual researcher his work is a gem. Ofcourse they'll attempt to understand the wide array of interests they'll have. com "His ideas were mainly theoretical explanations, laid out in exacting detail, but they were rarely experimental. He thought of new stuff as he used extensive introverted thinking. Of course scientists in an academic environment have an easy infrastructure for sharing ideas, but that still doesn't mean that their focus can't be more on the development of ideas. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. He just took what was given to him and tried to understand it fully. The way I'm following what you're saying, there may have been no living INTP in the whole world his time period. Its strange that while she totally believed in using cognitive functions she devised a dichotomy based system which defies both Jung and the more scientific continuum styled Big 5. da Vinci wasn't a master of anatomy. "Correction: it was revolutionary. I wonder how would you interpret this, Scotty. Look at this way. I still think he was a 5 though. If we indeed use different methods of typology then their is no debate whatsoever. but not very descriptive. He didn't go out of his way to seek new stuff. He carried around that rigorous scientific precision which he prioritized above experimentation, which not only hints at Ti-dominance but also 5. Anyways looks like another unnecessary impasse. Jung and MBTI originally was related to psyche not behavior. However, the main reason for ENTP over INTP is his very clear Ne dominance. And I think you'd even agree to that. he did not seek novelty, but rather a complete understanding. "He looked at humans like a mechanic would do. I agree with ENTP more than INTP for him. Did you even read the definition. Here is CT's take on ENTP vs. It wouldn't be my first choice though. Yet I feel da Vinci is correctly typed as an Ne Dom. However since ENTPs do have ample Ti, when they pick up a subject it is looked at through a logical lense. You said: "His focus was still on understanding (Ti) moreso than experiencing (Ne)". Also most of his works are incomplete. Isabel Briggs Myers, a researcher and practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed to see the judging-perceiving relationship as a fourth dichotomy influencing personality type.. We disagree which is fine. but if you look at what Myers actually said about the topic, she did believe in the dichotomies. I was just rambling on a tangent about a correlation. They are well suited to study data thoroughly which most scientific fields require nowadays. Shake hands and go our own ways.
. I'm not in tune with the Enneagram stuff, but I definitely see him as a 5, with how deeply analytical and knowledge enthusiast he was. " I don't know how you can't see Ti-dom in his nature but rather the novelty-seeking Ne-dom. :)The attempted operationalization has failed. MBTI isn't suited for that. It was deep for that period but not deep enough to be regarded as a revolution in anatomy. There is nothing higher. I think you're confusing P vs J with E vs I. You use behaviors to gauge I/E which is fine by me, but thats more Keirseyan than Jungian and using your Keirseyan method INTP does make sense. An Ne-Ti would invest their time investigating more subjects (interrelated or not) and dissect them with their Ti. Her fault is not choosing one method over other. Whether or not you prefer "Ne" or "Ti" can be just as ambiguous as numbers on an MBTI test. I think the key to understanding his personality is to compare him to his peers of the time. That's an odd assertion. Well lets look at Goethe (ENFJ), who is mistyped as an INFJ, is another polymath and while his contributions to many subjects are huge, he can never be categorized as a master of one subject. ISTJs make perfect scientists. I don't agree with all of it but interesting nonetheless. So an ENTP who is taking unusual interest in the subjects has to share his research willfully otherwise he becomes an INTP. You have meddled the two systems together not me. You said: "He didn't go out of his way to seek new stuff. He thought of new stuff as he used extensive introverted thinking. By the CT definition he's an INTP. Let's face it - we have improved our understanding of various personality topics since Jung first sketched out his ideas. Also, whether or not it is their drive to rationalize the world with Ti or experience the world with Ne. I assume that they are both Ne dom, LDV being an ENTP. com/blog/2013/08/the-difference-between-intp-and-entp/Oddly enough Keirsey who uses behavioral I/E has typed Da Vinci as an ENTP. Introverts in general are more likely to be "intellectual" and intense in their pursuit of knowledge and understanding, but this has nothing to do with breadth. Read through Personality Types. Da Vinci is more Ne-Ti than Ti-Ne. He was also pretty social with his colleagues and fellow scientists. Compare with François Ier, who was ENFP. His art itself had more basis in perfecting tradition which seems like Ti + Si. In reality, he hid his personal life. da Vinci kept all his stuff to himself in a scribbled notebook and rarely shared anything. His focus was still on understanding (Ti) moreso than experiencing (Ne). A Ti-Ne would invest a lot more time polishing the subject they have selected and not be springy, Both can have similar interests but an ENTP would be more expansive in their interests, an INTP would be more descriptive. You pull the strawman again and again but when its used against you, you complain and get personal. And while perfectionism may not have anything to do with J/P (I'd argue that INTP are in general more perfectionist than INTJ), it certainly has something to do with E vs I. What extroverted traits did he even have. "His interests are way too broad to be an Introvert. It seems like Leonardo just had a few close friends though. By weighing Ti against Ne he's an INTP. Why do you think Ne-dom is correct, just to get your line of thought. Anyhow we can get back to it later. Myers had a good understanding of Jung but she oversimplified it. It took him years to draw the Mona Lisa. Anyway, later. Ofcourse we can use exceptions to make a case for INTP. You can't miss an INTP. Its afterall not much explanatory but rather an overall examination of subject. By interacting with the physical world, extraverts can process and make sense of new information. From what I read I'm just getting introvert vibes, specifically INTP. Breaking down things to their principles and parts. Having read a lot about him he was surprisingly social and pretty outgoing. Loyal to their peers and to their internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. Detached and analytical, they excel at finding solutions to practical problems.. I'd attempt to reply later. Einstein obviously was much more concerned with the development than the sharing, so using my argument, Einstein wouldn't be an INTP. INTP Are you ENTP voters basing him off the mostly non factual TV series. Although, once again, experimentation is just one among many aspects of patterns exploration (Ne). I agree with the Ne part, but since both NTP types have Ne its true for both. He was a perfectionist and procrastinator and had a really weird sleeping pattern. Just because anatomy wasn't investigated enough there were no INTPs. He never really finished stuff, he was no way a J. You can be an INTP in one test and an INTJ in another. Intellect/Introspection is more related to N than I/E according to Jung. Like from biography. Please share more about your reasoning on INTP. He's an introvert, so he's an INTP. we both have argued our case. If you were to actually use my argument, you would look in context and see that I was talking about a continuum about sharing vs. Although it's quite rare (not to say he's an INTP btw). The test is outdated and non Jungian. Is he saying that absolution of knowledge is kinda relative, irrelevant. I guess he is an ENTP in that aspectIt's not the action of sharing ideas that makes you an introvert or extrovert, but the *focus* on sharing ideas. Both those types like to float and exchange ideas, but he kept them mostly confined in his head and paper. An Ne-dom even in Jungian definition would be looking to the external world for new inspirations. He jumped from one subject to another, that's not novelty seeking. it wasn't like he went on his own and said "I want to explore X skin deep". There's an INTP 7 out there too. You said: "Nah, he went extremely deep in anatomy by the time period's standards whether or not you will ever admit it". According to Jung himself the ideal scientist is ISTJ. If so you are voting in the wrong area for the wring type of person. Selecting Ti over Ne or vice versa is hardly ambiguous. I'd think a 7 would be a more experimental sort of artist. Because then one can counter argue that ENTPs can be very focused. They seem very similar and have a strong kinship. And then he makes drawings of mechanical objects, paintings, flying machines etc. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. Well according to Jung himself extroverts would have a broader range of interests than introverts. understanding, and ends with reason. He isn't known to have delved deep into any one subject unlike Leibniz and Descartes mentioned before. Introverted thinking is concerned with breaking down a subject to its principles and key parts. ENTPs are much more fluid in that regard. Their drive for knowledge is complete understanding of it, INTPs are annoyed by inconsistencies in logic and aren't fulfilled unless an argument reaches its logical conclusion. INTJ are the most intense in pursuing single narrow spectrums of knowledge due to the introvert intensity and judging focus. I think it originates more from a misconception that polymath = ENTP, when in reality I think INTP tend to be more of knowledge sponges and definitely more deeply analytical as he was. I think this ought to change the mind of ENTP voters. An INFJ might excel at so many subjects at the same because they are much more focused on a singular idea. anyway, Ne dom being a lead extroverted function means there are extroverted behaviors associated with it, like a need to share your ideas. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Visual Arts characters list.. Actually this debate and contrasting Da Vinci with INTPs we have brought in the debate makes my understanding on his type more clear. What good is that. Its not like its decided on a scale. They are well suited to study data thoroughly which most scientific fields require nowadays. The main way his work got out there was because it was commissioned. "It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. As for differentating between ENTP and INTP polymaths, it's all about whether or not they are an extrovert or introvert to me. Da Vinci studies anatomy, mechanics, aerodynamics, philosophy, painting, and what not. INTP are notorious for dropping projects and pursuits half way. Sometimes he could be such a dick: He was a big fan of puns and word games, and Folio 44 of his Codex Arundel contains a long list of playful synonyms for penis. I guess he is an ENTP in that aspectAns using your argument when Einstein willfully shared his research he became an ENTP. Because he is a genius his works are incredible but no one will ever call him a master of anatomy. there's no J in MBTI4 letters were originally a short hand for functions. And to say he never explored something in depth http://www. Not taking either side but would add just a little. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Leonardo da Vinci Myers-Briggs and personality type!. " Well if that's your criteria, he's surely an extrovert. I'll get back to this later. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Leonardo da Vinci' belongs to!. What exactly are your standards for Ti dominance. Thats my position. The introverted types prefer quiet reflection and privacy. The standards for being INTP is very easy. Anyway, posing that question is somewhat circular logic because da Vinci is the most famous polymath ever and because of htat he's typed as ENTP. org/files/46915/46915-h/46915-h. The MBTI questionnaire sorts people into one of 16 different personality types.. Introverts of all kinds are more perfectionist than their extroverted cousins,I don't really understand the E. I don't see his interests and character as extroverted. Well if we use Wiki's ddefinition than most scientists are extroverts since they do shaRe their research with world, they do interact with their peers. I fail to point any more INTP who would be like Da Vinci in this regard. We don't have to convince each other. I think INTPs with their tertiary Si are more willing to accept traditional methods of research and more likely to publish their work when they have perfected them. While INTPs are relatively more broad in their interest base, da Vinci is a stretch. You said: "An Ne-dom even in Jungian definition would be looking to the external world for new inspirations. All the ENTP arguments don't say anything except well that's what he must be because he knew about more than 1 subject. Modern MBTi gurus won't agree though. It was reduced to dichotomies just to operationalise the test, not types. The dude made detailed drawings that were not surpassed until the 20th century. ENTPs won't run around with half cooked idea. " Your take on MBTI is actually the unorthodox one. An INTP would loath to leave an unfinished work and are much more thorough. This goes against the nature of the 7. Or maybe to put it more simply - the extrovert's focus will be to share ideas and the introvert's focus will be to think ideas. "All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the. " All our knowledge has its origins in our perceptions. Nonetheless, I would definitely agree with xNTP. Descartes is also commonly accepted as INTP. Ne isn't experiencing, its exploration of ideas from multiple angles and in Ne-doms multi-faceted subjects themselves. da Vinci is INTP on all these. Breadth doesnt mean shallow. With regards to functions as well I believe that Ti is preferred over Ne. So how did so many INTP scientists share their respective ideas so regularly and with confidence. Type 5/INTP tend to put a higher value on knowledge anyway over 7/ENTP, and are more likely to be polymathsthere's nothing about being a polymath that hints at ENTP over INTP, especially when his approach was very technical, detailed, analytical as opposed to experimentalhe's an INTP 5 though. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. That is a definite criteria in Ti Dom vs Ne Dom debate. Especially a famous one. If you want to involve behaviour in the equation use Big 5 as MBTI isn't suited for that. Compare him to Leibniz, his "breadth" is limited to logic and philosophy. Its like arguing for something when you are looking at it through a very different angle. I think an ENTP more likely to be a polymath than an INTP holds weight.