Leonardo da Vinci Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
da Vinci wasn't a master of anatomy. Introverts of all kinds are more perfectionist than their extroverted cousins,I don't really understand the E. The test is outdated and non Jungian. He's an introvert, so he's an INTP. Also I don't much care for enneagram aspect of typology. He thought of new stuff as he used extensive introverted thinking. :)The attempted operationalization has failed. According to Jung himself the ideal scientist is ISTJ. He was a perfectionist and procrastinator and had a really weird sleeping pattern. And this is the true rule by which those who speculate about the effects of nature must proceed. He was also known to be very private with personal matters and not share a whole lot of of his work. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Leonardo da Vinci? What about enneagram and other personality types?. I don't see his interests and character as extroverted. His art itself had more basis in perfecting tradition which seems like Ti + Si. Well if we use Wiki's ddefinition than most scientists are extroverts since they do shaRe their research with world, they do interact with their peers. Not taking either side but would add just a little. And then he makes drawings of mechanical objects, paintings, flying machines etc.
. Selecting Ti over Ne or vice versa is hardly ambiguous. I will say I don't understand the 6 wing though and my guess for enneagram would be 5w4 then 7w8. The fact that no one bothered to delve into the subject for along time is irrelevant here. Whether or not you prefer "Ne" or "Ti" can be just as ambiguous as numbers on an MBTI test. I assume that they are both Ne dom, LDV being an ENTP. They are well suited to study data thoroughly which most scientific fields require nowadays. That is a definite criteria in Ti Dom vs Ne Dom debate. MBTI is basically a 4 factor interpretation of Jung's work, no. How can you justify that its both behavioral and a dichotomy at the same time. Breaking down things to their principles and parts. I think you're confusing P vs J with E vs I. I fail to point any more INTP who would be like Da Vinci in this regard. If so you are voting in the wrong area for the wring type of person. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Visual Arts characters list.. Anyway, later. You are an I if you score 49 but an E if you score 51. Breadth doesnt mean shallow. I think it originates more from a misconception that polymath = ENTP, when in reality I think INTP tend to be more of knowledge sponges and definitely more deeply analytical as he was. With regards to functions as well I believe that Ti is preferred over Ne. Please share more about your reasoning on INTP. Anyhow we can get back to it later. I wonder how would you interpret this, Scotty. Although it's quite rare (not to say he's an INTP btw). Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for extraverts and interior for introverts.. I agree with ENTP more than INTP for him. there's no sign of him taking in a ton of stuff. "His interests are way too broad to be an Introvert. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. All the well known INTPs have literally been the pioneers and masters of their field. From what I read I'm just getting introvert vibes, specifically INTP. Its afterall not much explanatory but rather an overall examination of subject. htmI'm never going to vote da Vinci as ENTP, so yeah it's a lost fight, especially when you seem to be going on what he actually accomplished and trying to type that against a near impossible INTP template, rather than trying to get inside his head and how he thought. MBTI is a dichotomy because its related to cognitive functions; in this case Ti and Ne. Like from biography. Its like arguing for something when you are looking at it through a very different angle. INTP are notorious for dropping projects and pursuits half way. Their drive for knowledge is complete understanding of it, INTPs are annoyed by inconsistencies in logic and aren't fulfilled unless an argument reaches its logical conclusion. "First I shall do some experiments before I proceed farther, because my intention is to cite experience first and then with reasoning show why such experience is bound to operate in such a way. Understanding through use of strawmans - what type is that, apparently INTJ. So, ENTP, not INTP. There's an INTP 7 out there too. Introverted thinking is concerned with breaking down a subject to its principles and key parts. An Ne-Ti would invest their time investigating more subjects (interrelated or not) and dissect them with their Ti. com/blog/2013/08/the-difference-between-intp-and-entp/Oddly enough Keirsey who uses behavioral I/E has typed Da Vinci as an ENTP. INTP Are you ENTP voters basing him off the mostly non factual TV series. Everything about his behavior that I can see leads to the conclusion that he was in fact introverted, and if you look at the functions, his Ti use was clearly more prevalent than Ne. we both have argued our case. He carried around that rigorous scientific precision which he prioritized above experimentation, which not only hints at Ti-dominance but also 5. He's arguably the most Ne person in history. Both those types like to float and exchange ideas, but he kept them mostly confined in his head and paper. com/20157-anatomy-drawings-leonardo-da-vinci. "Correction: it was revolutionary. Also, whether or not it is their drive to rationalize the world with Ti or experience the world with Ne. The main way his work got out there was because it was commissioned. I was just rambling on a tangent about a correlation. celebritytypes. It was reduced to dichotomies just to operationalise the test, not types. Einstein obviously was much more concerned with the development than the sharing, so using my argument, Einstein wouldn't be an INTP. There is nothing higher. that seems to be a bit of moving the goalposts.
. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Leonardo da Vinci MBTI type.. As for differentating between ENTP and INTP polymaths, it's all about whether or not they are an extrovert or introvert to me. Ne isn't experiencing, its exploration of ideas from multiple angles and in Ne-doms multi-faceted subjects themselves. By doing so you're rebutting against an absolutist strawman stance which bears no resemblance to my stance whatsoever. You can't miss an INTP. Jung and MBTI originally was related to psyche not behavior. An INTP would prefer more time on a subject. They seem very similar and have a strong kinship. Lets not waste our energies. it wasn't like he went on his own and said "I want to explore X skin deep". I'd think a 7 would be a more experimental sort of artist. I'm not in tune with the Enneagram stuff, but I definitely see him as a 5, with how deeply analytical and knowledge enthusiast he was. You seem to be one of the few people here who thinks he is basically an enneagram 5 although you didn't say so, but also ENTP. They are well suited to study data thoroughly which most scientific fields require nowadays. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Leonardo da Vinci Myers-Briggs and personality type!. Da Vinci studies anatomy, mechanics, aerodynamics, philosophy, painting, and what not. Introverts in general are more likely to be "intellectual" and intense in their pursuit of knowledge and understanding, but this has nothing to do with breadth. INTJ are the most intense in pursuing single narrow spectrums of knowledge due to the introvert intensity and judging focus. The standards for being INTP is very easy. In reality, he hid his personal life. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Leonardo da Vinci likely is!. I agree though alot of Jung's work was refined by his NTP students van Der Hoop and von Franz. So how did so many INTP scientists share their respective ideas so regularly and with confidence. He thought of new stuff as he used extensive introverted thinking. Also most of his works are incomplete. Of course scientists in an academic environment have an easy infrastructure for sharing ideas, but that still doesn't mean that their focus can't be more on the development of ideas. I don't agree with all of it but interesting nonetheless. Why do you think Ne-dom is correct, just to get your line of thought. That is the breadth of subjects. A Ti-Ne would invest a lot more time polishing the subject they have selected and not be springy, Both can have similar interests but an ENTP would be more expansive in their interests, an INTP would be more descriptive. Its strange that while she totally believed in using cognitive functions she devised a dichotomy based system which defies both Jung and the more scientific continuum styled Big 5. You said: "An Ne-dom even in Jungian definition would be looking to the external world for new inspirations. It took him years to draw the Mona Lisa. We disagree which is fine. So far we have one person saying "cause he's a 7" and another saying "cause he's a polymath", when he's quite clearly a 5 and I don't get the relevance of polymath in E vs I. What good is that. He never really finished stuff, he was no way a J. Or whether or not they are aggressive in sharing unfinished ideas or refining and developing their ideas with utmost precision until they are completely satisfied. The test itself is good for nothin. Its not like its decided on a scale. The idea of him having a bunch of vague concepts in his notebooks is not related to 7 or ENTP. He also lived an extremely private life, doing his best not to challenge social conventions (inferior Fe not Si)How do you differentiate between INTPs and ENTPs in general and respective polymaths specifically. And while perfectionism may not have anything to do with J/P (I'd argue that INTP are in general more perfectionist than INTJ), it certainly has something to do with E vs I. He just took what was given to him and tried to understand it fully. "It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. It seems like Leonardo just had a few close friends though. " Well if that's your criteria, he's surely an extrovert. What extroverted traits did he even have. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. Let's face it - we have improved our understanding of various personality topics since Jung first sketched out his ideas. Myers had a good understanding of Jung but she oversimplified it. His focus was still on understanding (Ti) moreso than experiencing (Ne). You're turning my argument into a black and white dichotomy, when I'm really just speaking of shades of gray. Actually this debate and contrasting Da Vinci with INTPs we have brought in the debate makes my understanding on his type more clear. He jumped from one subject to another, that's not novelty seeking. The second part is circumstantial at best, wouldn't an ENTP do the same if he is commissioned to do multi subject research, I think he was pretty happy with his predicament. If we indeed use different methods of typology then their is no debate whatsoever. His interests are way to broad to be an Introvert. A Ji-dom would probably get on his own case more. An INFJ might excel at so many subjects at the same because they are much more focused on a singular idea. Modern MBTi gurus won't agree though. Great work guys. htmlLeibniz gave alot of time and focus to perfect Calculus and his philosophy. Back to da Vinci though, how is he an extrovert. Why extrovert. I think he's mistyped as extrovert because Da Vinci Code portrayed him as a flamboyant gay. Nah, he went extremely deep in anatomy by the time period's standards whether or not you will ever admit it. perfectionism have absolutely nnothnin to do with the J/P dichotomyJs are much more likely to be perfectionists than Ps so that doesn't really support your case. You can be an INTP in one test and an INTJ in another. He didn't go out of his way to seek new stuff. Well MBTI is a dichotomy and using absolute behaviors to link to I or E does make it very black and white when its not. The way he left so many projects unfinished seems stereotypically Pe-dom. Fun fact - although it doesn't prove anything, or so -, Kant had it this way:. That's an odd assertion. However, the main reason for ENTP over INTP is his very clear Ne dominance. Their utmost focus is to clarify ideas. there's nothing 7 about him. Da Vinci is more Ne-Ti than Ti-Ne. understanding, and ends with reason. As for "multi-field INTP", you seem to think Leibniz is an INTP and he was certainly multi-field. And to say he never explored something in depth http://www. But because he is a genius even when he is a casual researcher his work is a gem. It wouldn't be my first choice though. Again, da Vinci was all thinking and no sharing. Here is CT's take on ENTP vs. Could be INTP in scottology. You said: "Nah, he went extremely deep in anatomy by the time period's standards whether or not you will ever admit it". However since ENTPs do have ample Ti, when they pick up a subject it is looked at through a logical lense. The way I'm following what you're saying, there may have been no living INTP in the whole world his time period. I'd attempt to reply later. Intellect/Introspection is more related to N than I/E according to Jung. Continuum is more of a Big 5 think because its related to behavior. He was also pretty social with his colleagues and fellow scientists. " Your take on MBTI is actually the unorthodox one. Thats my position. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. but if you look at what Myers actually said about the topic, she did believe in the dichotomies. But there's nothing in his history which hints at extroversion or Ne-dom. And his art clearly was from a Ti rather than Ne perspective. Read something he wrote to get a glimpse into his mind (A Treatise on Painting). And when you think about it, the surface explorations of topics were a lot due simply to his job and what he was commissioned to do. You said: "His focus was still on understanding (Ti) moreso than experiencing (Ne)". Its not so with regards to functions. He isn't known to have delved deep into any one subject unlike Leibniz and Descartes mentioned before. While INTPs are relatively more broad in their interest base, da Vinci is a stretch. Well lets look at Goethe (ENFJ), who is mistyped as an INFJ, is another polymath and while his contributions to many subjects are huge, he can never be categorized as a master of one subject. da Vinci kept all his stuff to himself in a scribbled notebook and rarely shared anything. Her fault is not choosing one method over other. Apart from a few sketches what is his contribution tonthe subject. Information processing occurs for introverts as they explore ideas and concepts internally. You have meddled the two systems together not me. E or I I can't really say, but I lean INTP. The introverted types prefer quiet reflection and privacy. ISTJs make perfect scientists. By weighing Ti against Ne he's an INTP. "All our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the. You said: "He didn't go out of his way to seek new stuff. An INTP would loath to leave an unfinished work and are much more thorough. Descartes is also commonly accepted as INTP. If you were to actually use my argument, you would look in context and see that I was talking about a continuum about sharing vs. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. " All our knowledge has its origins in our perceptions. INTJs are interested in ideas and theories when observing the world.. Is he saying that absolution of knowledge is kinda relative, irrelevant. Well according to Jung himself extroverts would have a broader range of interests than introverts. He's usually typed as a 7. This goes against the nature of the 7. Ofcourse they'll attempt to understand the wide array of interests they'll have. The guy was just idea after idea and rarely finished anything. It was deep for that period but not deep enough to be regarded as a revolution in anatomy. Although, once again, experimentation is just one among many aspects of patterns exploration (Ne). In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Leonardo da Vinci' belongs to!. "PREFER quiet interaction"Your argument also suggests Ne isn't introspective at all which is an odd assertion. But Da Vinci doesn't stay on that subject for long. I think an ENTP more likely to be a polymath than an INTP holds weight. Read through Personality Types. Having read a lot about him he was surprisingly social and pretty outgoing. But you mean an ENTP would just experience the subject in a vacuum with attempting to understand it. look at what was said in that article. Because then one can counter argue that ENTPs can be very focused. I think INTPs with their tertiary Si are more willing to accept traditional methods of research and more likely to publish their work when they have perfected them. Nonetheless, I would definitely agree with xNTP. Ans using your argument when Einstein willfully shared his research he became an ENTP. da Vinci is INTP on all these. While Ne does use its environment for data, it is in the end introspective. All the ENTP arguments don't say anything except well that's what he must be because he knew about more than 1 subject. He just took what was given to him and tried to understand it fully. Da Vinci has no such primary focus. I think the key to understanding his personality is to compare him to his peers of the time. If you want to involve behaviour in the equation use Big 5 as MBTI isn't suited for that. developing ideas. Quiet, reflective, and idealistic. Interested in serving humanity. Well-developed value system, which they strive to live in accordance with.. Sometimes he could be such a dick: He was a big fan of puns and word games, and Folio 44 of his Codex Arundel contains a long list of playful synonyms for penis. Type 5/INTP tend to put a higher value on knowledge anyway over 7/ENTP, and are more likely to be polymathsthere's nothing about being a polymath that hints at ENTP over INTP, especially when his approach was very technical, detailed, analytical as opposed to experimentalhe's an INTP 5 though. Or maybe to put it more simply - the extrovert's focus will be to share ideas and the introvert's focus will be to think ideas. g an ENTP on average would be more intellectually driven than an average ISFP. He was also pretty social with his colleagues and fellow scientists. Did you even read the definition. I'll get back to this later. " I don't know how you can't see Ti-dom in his nature but rather the novelty-seeking Ne-dom. And that's because once you take away that INTP template which basically requires godlike analytical drive, it's pretty clear that he had *nearly* godlike analytical drive. Two very different things. Anyways looks like another unnecessary impasse. ENTPs won't run around with half cooked idea. Compare him to Leibniz, his "breadth" is limited to logic and philosophy. I agree his Ti is very polished, it is his auxiliary type afterall but he sure is an Ne Dom. ENTPs are much more fluid in that regard. I agree with the Ne part, but since both NTP types have Ne its true for both. Yet I feel da Vinci is correctly typed as an Ne Dom. I guess he is an ENTP in that aspectAns using your argument when Einstein willfully shared his research he became an ENTP. I think this ought to change the mind of ENTP voters. I agree that INTJ is the most single minded of the IN types and INTP seeks broader scope. Anyway, posing that question is somewhat circular logic because da Vinci is the most famous polymath ever and because of htat he's typed as ENTP. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. anyway, Ne dom being a lead extroverted function means there are extroverted behaviors associated with it, like a need to share your ideas. com "His ideas were mainly theoretical explanations, laid out in exacting detail, but they were rarely experimental. And I think you'd even agree to that. Let's look at Wikipedia and what they have to say - "The extraverted types learn best by talking and interacting with others. Ofcourse we can use exceptions to make a case for INTP. He didn't keep to one topic for long. than reason "Oh, here's one that's even better:. org/files/46915/46915-h/46915-h. Just because anatomy wasn't investigated enough there were no INTPs. MBTI's four dichotomies are on a scale, a scale which oddly divides the dichotomies at midway score. Especially a famous one. By the CT definition he's an INTP. but not very descriptive. No, that's not my argument. ISTJs make perfect scientists. They went out and happened to things. Da Vinci while did research on anatomy wasn't a master in the subject in any sense of word. Well they din't know about gravity as well, I guess there were no INTJs as well. Compare with François Ier, who was ENFP. An INTP wouldn't investigate a subject just to leave it like that. he did not seek novelty, but rather a complete understanding. MBTI isn't suited for that. We don't have to convince each other. Shake hands and go our own ways. I was sheerly arguing in line with Jungian typology, you brought in neo-MBTI stuff which is nothing more than Keirsey's framework. Behavior isn't the deciding factor in Jungian/MBTI typology. Look at this way. So an ENTP who is taking unusual interest in the subjects has to share his research willfully otherwise he becomes an INTP. External input into his mind seemed to be minimal because he'd rather think about stuff he already knew. Because he is a genius his works are incredible but no one will ever call him a master of anatomy. ENTPs have Ti afterall. What exactly are your standards for Ti dominance. You pull the strawman again and again but when its used against you, you complain and get personal. An Ne-dom even in Jungian definition would be looking to the external world for new inspirations. The dude made detailed drawings that were not surpassed until the 20th century. You use behaviors to gauge I/E which is fine by me, but thats more Keirseyan than Jungian and using your Keirseyan method INTP does make sense. "He looked at humans like a mechanic would do. By interacting with the physical world, extraverts can process and make sense of new information. I still think he was a 5 though. I guess he is an ENTP in that aspectIt's not the action of sharing ideas that makes you an introvert or extrovert, but the *focus* on sharing ideas. " I would expect an ENTP to be more experiment and less theory. there's no J in MBTI4 letters were originally a short hand for functions.