Sam Harris Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
Arguments for both sides welcome. He has an insanely strong Ti propably the strongest of any INFJ's I have ever come across, however the subtle nuance that he is capable to handling conversations and social interaction could not be pulled off by an INTJ. INFJ's are the kind of people who would never try to tell anyone what it is or force themselves to anyone. That's a really interesting interpreation Scotty. Every person’s preference can be found on a spectrum, so just choose the letter you identify with most.. His way too concerned about the reactions of the people around him and proper code of conduct. Yes, the negotiation you are talking about does happen, but that, in Jung's terms would be an "objective" focus, a sign of Extraversion rather than Feeling. I mean of all the guys speaking against Islam he is easily the most patient and collected. Hitchen's is trying to ram himself through, Harris is trying to negotiate with people and has insane patience in doing so. Jordan Peterson (INFJ) debate on the nature of truth. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Sam Harris? What about enneagram and other personality types?. And you can sense how he fears that any step might be the last one. It is no surprise to me that he is usually typed as an LIE (ENTj) within the socionics community. You can't but be amazed by the level of his craft in doing so. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Sam Harris likely is!. I could see him as an unusually subtle and self-contained ENTJ or as an INTJ, but I haven’t yet decided if he meets the Jungian/MBTI criteria for introversion. You can see him always extend to the people around him, giving them a chance to agree with him. For an INFJ the situation goes against the very grain of their existence, hence the level of focus in producing the exact image and behavior. I'm not understanding the INFJ votes. And they can both be highly impersonal if the situation demands it. Why couldn't an ENTJ play the role of the "cool-headed intellectual", or even be a "beta male" in general. Maybe that quote on CT sounds Fe but it's probably just a secular reason for morality and atheist are likely to gave such reasoning, either Fe or Fi in the way they sound, to prove that religion=/=morality. He does not decimate his opponents like a TJ would, he makes them look bad next to his pitch perfect example, WHILE being a racist torwards the religion of Islam. An INFJ in an insane position, all I'm sayin'. Under such circumstances I think INTJ's would be willing to be more ultimate. A heavy Te user wouldn't debate like he does, they would make hard and uncompromised statements rather than try to politely debate a person. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. Much better than I could explain. He is always trying to find common ground and says thinks such as "surely we can all agree, that there are universal moral principles". I challenge anyone to analyze his interactions and tell me they could do a better job in at the same time disagreeing about everything on the rational level, while holding on to proper code of conduct and not giving anyone an excuse to attack him (Fe-Ti). I think by remaning as impersonal as possible, he is choosing the path of least conflict and greatest possibility for consensus. I disagree with your analysis of Harris (Chomsky, an LII INTJ ran rational circles around him in an embarrassing exchange), but apart from that it seems like you would expect an INFJ to be more impersonal than an INTJ which to me just seems like a ludicrous concept to be working from. Harris is not the most sophisticated or nuanced academic (although intellectually honest) but that does not mean he isn’t a T type. On the contrary he does his very best to compel the people around him and does so in a gentle manner. Sam sounds like a soulless robot. You're either an INFP, an ISFP, an ISFJ or an INFJ. You tell me, how can a guy who is seen as a racist, come off as the better person. I believe he would only do the same thing, but with more passion and a louder voice, which would be to keep on compelling people to change their minds, rather than outright telling them to do so. Now ofcourse he is coming from an insane position, going against Islam and risking being seen as a total rasist etc. And don't get me wrong, I don't think he is all impersonal. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. While at the same time taking his opponents into consideration and giving them time to speak etc. No, they will tell you, this is what it is and this is what I think about it. INTJ's make statements, INFJ's negotiate. Outwardly he's very cold and serious and he approaches things in a scientific and empirical manner. For an INTJ it wouldn't be a problem, because it's not like they are afraid of not having consensus or insulting somebody. I don't get that same sense from INTJ's, even when they are being impersonal or having a poker face, there is something much colder behind those faces. Another good example is Bernie Sanders, he doesn't debate, you hear him speak and his gonna tell you and he isn't afraid of conflict, he creates it and has the balls to do it despite his totally unorthodox position within the American framework of politics. I could see him being an INTP, unless he seemed so capable and collected socially. Like I said, just look at Hitchens. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Sam Harris MBTI type.. Despite being totally against Islam I feel he radiates compassion, understanding and a hope we could all agree and find a reasonable common ground. He is building a Ti system of morals and ethics in his speaking and expects the listener, not to conform just because this is what it is, but to come to the realization that he is right, because the logic is so sound. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Sam Harris' belongs to!. Most of what you're saying can be because he's an enneagram 1. He is all about the people and the society. Similarly, saying Fe is necessarily non-confrontational and diplomatic is also false. The arguments made below about Te being necessarily confrontational and non-negotiating are false. This is exactly how he is. To find out what your MBTI personality type is you need to complete the MBTI questionnaire and take part in a feedback session from a qualified MBTI practitioner.. That is a paradox in itself and there's only a few answers. The way he is such an adept self-promoter while able to stay externally level-headed is evidence of him being an Extraverted Thinker to me, as well as an ENTJ type in MBTI. However the way in which he presents himself is all Fe-Ti in my view. Unlike these guys, he hasn't been pushed through the edge.
. I think we may over-think that he might be a ''male'' INFJ, when he's more likely just a polite INTJ. I mean how do you think all the great influencers of our history, who have been INFJ's have pulled it off. He hopes he wouldn't have to rise to the barricades and split the planet in half. An ENTJ with greater intelligence than Rogan, would never end up being the Beta of the situation :P Especially in the overtly submissive manner of Harris in those interviews :P Once again he would be way more assertive and ballsy was he a Te user. The difference lies in the approach taken. Good summation, imperator. I'm just saying, the guy is a cuddly man inside, he radiates compassion. Now okay once again an INTJ could indeed remain highly impersonal and not give in to the frustrations of his Fi, but I believe the presentation would still be different. It would be more on point, less compelling and it would be impersonal in a manner of being cold, not impersonal in the manner of being mindful of the situation and giving space to others. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Harris is probably a calm tempered INTJ compared to the stereotypical hot tempered INTJ. And before you say Hitler or Gandhi, these guys had totally let gone of the idea of any consensus. Watch the Harris (xNTJ) vs. You can feel how every second he speaks, he senses the pressure he is surrounded with, so rather than poke the beehive, he speaks in the softest possible manner carefully choosing every word.
. Being an INFJ, he would be aware of it to an insane degree. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Sam Harris Myers-Briggs and personality type!. You must remember that the position his coming from. Atleast all the INTJ's in that same position seem to be. I thought Chomsky was an INFJ aswell, but I have to admit I haven't watched many of his interactions :PWhat you are describing sounds like a strategic extroverted approach, focused as much on how he comes off to others as the ideas themselves. Wether Hitchens was INTJ or not, his aggresive style of reasoning shouldn't be the bar for every INTJ debater to compared to, and if he doesn't fit, he's INFJ. Now if you then imagine, that Harris would one day loose his cool, you think he would come off as a TJ. It doesn’t matter that he sometimes does this crudely — he almost always tries to. I mean come on guys, who could pull something like that off. I just can't imagine Harris acting like an angry Te user. He doesn't try to state his opinions as facts (Te), but he carefully arguments himself and expects the internal logic (Ti) of his arguments to speak for themselves. He doesn't want to make everyone agree under his will because it is the best way of doing things, he wants everyone to be united and happy, because it makes the most sense. He is like a man walking on thin ice knowing it could crack at any moment. There's no way he's a Ti user. The distinction is this: Te constructs its arguments based on verifiable truths or truth arrangements, while Fe constructs its arguments based on norms, ethics, conscience, and understanding of interpersonal relations. Both functions can confront and argue assertively, and both functions can placate and argue diplomatically. However I do think that an INFJ of all the types are capable of having an objective in the outer world. So to the last drop, he tries to avoid conflict from happening. And even if he was a more subtle INTJ, in the end all TJ's are confrontational rather than people who try to find a common ground. Being an extraverted thinking type (Jung) or E + N + T + J (letter dichotomies) does not exclude this possibility. so it's not like he always succeeds in his endeavors. INFJs are visionaries and idealists who ooze creative imagination and brilliant ideas.. You could never imagine Sam Harris doing what Hitchens and Sanders are doing every time they open their mouths. The second Harris realizes Peterson’s conception of truth is nestled within moral concerns and accumulated social norms, he stops talking about anything else and spends the remaining hour and a half trying to convince Peterson to adopt a more logical/factual conception of truth. Well okay you can make the argument that being all about the people and the society could be explained by being an enneagram 1 or just having such points of interest in life no matter the type. They have a strong Fe and it drives them to do stuff, most of the times, in a calculated manner. Huh I'm talking about his MBTI type, not some dubious male hierarchy bullshit. He is clearly focusing on being as impersonal as he can, while trying to compel the people to make a change. Anyone snapping at Sam Harris comes off as the lesser intellectual or the man who's integrity was lower. So even if the notion that Te is non-diplomatic is true, Harris confirms to that definition in this debate. INTJ's being impersonal do not try to convince you to make a change, they don't try to negotiate with you about your existence, they don't give you a chance of having your own opinion while naively hoping you would realize it by yourself. Harris is trying to work the system from the inside. Isabel Briggs Myers, a researcher and practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed to see the judging-perceiving relationship as a fourth dichotomy influencing personality type.. Now okay, this is my personal insight about the matter, but what I sense in Sam Harris is a guy who is in a ridiculous position and who's trying his best to still make it all good for everyone. Even his moral worldview is an attempt to make morality scientific, factual, and logical. Now what is obvious he is no extravert so he must be an INFJ. The man is all Ti and has the capacity to transmit it with great skill and care with a strong Fe. But I'm just saying. He seems to be more about simply getting at the truth of the matter unbiased (of course like everyone he is biased) rather than some Fe-like ideology he defends. The agenda's behind an INTJ would be completely different. I mean the guy is basicly saying Islam sucks, which is a total taboo in the modern world of political correctedness. Even if it was all calculated. But I do believe his awareness of his position inhibits him from going all out. And a ton of INFJs are probably mistyped (particularly male ones) so I wouldn't say they are a particularly influential type in history. I can't see him as an ENTJ based on his interviews on Joe Rogan Experience, they guy acts like a total beta male compared to the alpha of Joe Rogan. In what regard is he about the people and society in which he lives. Another example Karl Marx. He doesn't really want conflict, he wants to find a mutual way for everyone to agree upon and that's what he's trying to build with his arguments, a bridge between the people. I think Harris is playing the audience and playing the people he is talking with, but I also think the agenda is based on compassion and a genuine desire for consensus. Or an angry Fi user for that matter. NTJ makes sense, they love to appear non-biased while being biasedI don't quite see the Fe in the way he discuss things or in the reason. Compared to Hitchen's who gets pissed off and openly shows his anger. And in other debates where he is more measured and diplomatic, he always proceeds from the cognitive orientation of facts-and-truth-above-all-else. Peterson repeatedly tries to build bridges with Harris and move the discussion forward without conceding, but Harris is relentless. An INTJ could come to the same conclusion in their planning, a need to produce a calculated image and so forth, but once again the basic drive and motive would be vastly different from that of Harris resulting in a slightly different form of delivery. Harris is still hoping the situation can be solved through reasonable means when it comes to the general opinions of the society about the subject.
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!