Sign Up | Log in |

Sam Harris Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info

Sam Harris MBTI personality type cover chart

But I'm just saying. INFJ's are the kind of people who would never try to tell anyone what it is or force themselves to anyone. And even if he was a more subtle INTJ, in the end all TJ's are confrontational rather than people who try to find a common ground. Being an extraverted thinking type (Jung) or E + N + T + J (letter dichotomies) does not exclude this possibility. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Sam Harris? What about enneagram and other personality types?. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Sam Harris' belongs to!. Anyone snapping at Sam Harris comes off as the lesser intellectual or the man who's integrity was lower. You're either an INFP, an ISFP, an ISFJ or an INFJ. I'm just saying, the guy is a cuddly man inside, he radiates compassion. And a ton of INFJs are probably mistyped (particularly male ones) so I wouldn't say they are a particularly influential type in history. INTJ's make statements, INFJ's negotiate. He does not decimate his opponents like a TJ would, he makes them look bad next to his pitch perfect example, WHILE being a racist torwards the religion of Islam. He is always trying to find common ground and says thinks such as "surely we can all agree, that there are universal moral principles". Or an angry Fi user for that matter. Another good example is Bernie Sanders, he doesn't debate, you hear him speak and his gonna tell you and he isn't afraid of conflict, he creates it and has the balls to do it despite his totally unorthodox position within the American framework of politics. Maybe that quote on CT sounds Fe but it's probably just a secular reason for morality and atheist are likely to gave such reasoning, either Fe or Fi in the way they sound, to prove that religion=/=morality. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Sam Harris likely is!. Unlike these guys, he hasn't been pushed through the edge. He seems to be more about simply getting at the truth of the matter unbiased (of course like everyone he is biased) rather than some Fe-like ideology he defends. I mean come on guys, who could pull something like that off. Being an INFJ, he would be aware of it to an insane degree. His way too concerned about the reactions of the people around him and proper code of conduct. Despite being totally against Islam I feel he radiates compassion, understanding and a hope we could all agree and find a reasonable common ground. The second Harris realizes Peterson’s conception of truth is nestled within moral concerns and accumulated social norms, he stops talking about anything else and spends the remaining hour and a half trying to convince Peterson to adopt a more logical/factual conception of truth. Harris is trying to work the system from the inside. He doesn't really want conflict, he wants to find a mutual way for everyone to agree upon and that's what he's trying to build with his arguments, a bridge between the people. You can feel how every second he speaks, he senses the pressure he is surrounded with, so rather than poke the beehive, he speaks in the softest possible manner carefully choosing every word. You can see him always extend to the people around him, giving them a chance to agree with him. Like I said, just look at Hitchens. Watch the Harris (xNTJ) vs. There's no way he's a Ti user. Hitchen's is trying to ram himself through, Harris is trying to negotiate with people and has insane patience in doing so. Yes, the negotiation you are talking about does happen, but that, in Jung's terms would be an "objective" focus, a sign of Extraversion rather than Feeling. Most of what you're saying can be because he's an enneagram 1. However the way in which he presents himself is all Fe-Ti in my view. And you can sense how he fears that any step might be the last one. I can't see him as an ENTJ based on his interviews on Joe Rogan Experience, they guy acts like a total beta male compared to the alpha of Joe Rogan. They have a strong Fe and it drives them to do stuff, most of the times, in a calculated manner. Even his moral worldview is an attempt to make morality scientific, factual, and logical. NTJ makes sense, they love to appear non-biased while being biasedI don't quite see the Fe in the way he discuss things or in the reason. INTJ's being impersonal do not try to convince you to make a change, they don't try to negotiate with you about your existence, they don't give you a chance of having your own opinion while naively hoping you would realize it by yourself. I believe he would only do the same thing, but with more passion and a louder voice, which would be to keep on compelling people to change their minds, rather than outright telling them to do so. Sam sounds like a soulless robot. Now okay once again an INTJ could indeed remain highly impersonal and not give in to the frustrations of his Fi, but I believe the presentation would still be different. Arguments for both sides welcome. An ENTJ with greater intelligence than Rogan, would never end up being the Beta of the situation :P Especially in the overtly submissive manner of Harris in those interviews :P Once again he would be way more assertive and ballsy was he a Te user. The difference lies in the approach taken. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. I think Harris is playing the audience and playing the people he is talking with, but I also think the agenda is based on compassion and a genuine desire for consensus. He has an insanely strong Ti propably the strongest of any INFJ's I have ever come across, however the subtle nuance that he is capable to handling conversations and social interaction could not be pulled off by an INTJ. For an INTJ it wouldn't be a problem, because it's not like they are afraid of not having consensus or insulting somebody. You could never imagine Sam Harris doing what Hitchens and Sanders are doing every time they open their mouths. Harris is not the most sophisticated or nuanced academic (although intellectually honest) but that does not mean he isn’t a T type. To find out what your MBTI personality type is you need to complete the MBTI questionnaire and take part in a feedback session from a qualified MBTI practitioner.. The distinction is this: Te constructs its arguments based on verifiable truths or truth arrangements, while Fe constructs its arguments based on norms, ethics, conscience, and understanding of interpersonal relations. Another example Karl Marx. Harris is probably a calm tempered INTJ compared to the stereotypical hot tempered INTJ. And they can both be highly impersonal if the situation demands it. Wether Hitchens was INTJ or not, his aggresive style of reasoning shouldn't be the bar for every INTJ debater to compared to, and if he doesn't fit, he's INFJ. Now okay, this is my personal insight about the matter, but what I sense in Sam Harris is a guy who is in a ridiculous position and who's trying his best to still make it all good for everyone. I'm not understanding the INFJ votes. Well okay you can make the argument that being all about the people and the society could be explained by being an enneagram 1 or just having such points of interest in life no matter the type. Even if it was all calculated. Similarly, saying Fe is necessarily non-confrontational and diplomatic is also false. I don't get that same sense from INTJ's, even when they are being impersonal or having a poker face, there is something much colder behind those faces. Under such circumstances I think INTJ's would be willing to be more ultimate. Outwardly he's very cold and serious and he approaches things in a scientific and empirical manner. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. It doesn’t matter that he sometimes does this crudely — he almost always tries to. You must remember that the position his coming from. I disagree with your analysis of Harris (Chomsky, an LII INTJ ran rational circles around him in an embarrassing exchange), but apart from that it seems like you would expect an INFJ to be more impersonal than an INTJ which to me just seems like a ludicrous concept to be working from. so it's not like he always succeeds in his endeavors.

. I think we may over-think that he might be a ''male'' INFJ, when he's more likely just a polite INTJ. I challenge anyone to analyze his interactions and tell me they could do a better job in at the same time disagreeing about everything on the rational level, while holding on to proper code of conduct and not giving anyone an excuse to attack him (Fe-Ti). Both functions can confront and argue assertively, and both functions can placate and argue diplomatically. And in other debates where he is more measured and diplomatic, he always proceeds from the cognitive orientation of facts-and-truth-above-all-else. Harris is still hoping the situation can be solved through reasonable means when it comes to the general opinions of the society about the subject. Compared to Hitchen's who gets pissed off and openly shows his anger. I think by remaning as impersonal as possible, he is choosing the path of least conflict and greatest possibility for consensus. I mean the guy is basicly saying Islam sucks, which is a total taboo in the modern world of political correctedness. Much better than I could explain. Huh I'm talking about his MBTI type, not some dubious male hierarchy bullshit. Peterson repeatedly tries to build bridges with Harris and move the discussion forward without conceding, but Harris is relentless. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. Why couldn't an ENTJ play the role of the "cool-headed intellectual", or even be a "beta male" in general. He doesn't want to make everyone agree under his will because it is the best way of doing things, he wants everyone to be united and happy, because it makes the most sense. Now what is obvious he is no extravert so he must be an INFJ. That is a paradox in itself and there's only a few answers. I mean of all the guys speaking against Islam he is easily the most patient and collected. For an INFJ the situation goes against the very grain of their existence, hence the level of focus in producing the exact image and behavior. I just can't imagine Harris acting like an angry Te user. Now ofcourse he is coming from an insane position, going against Islam and risking being seen as a total rasist etc. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. You can't but be amazed by the level of his craft in doing so. I thought Chomsky was an INFJ aswell, but I have to admit I haven't watched many of his interactions :PWhat you are describing sounds like a strategic extroverted approach, focused as much on how he comes off to others as the ideas themselves. He is building a Ti system of morals and ethics in his speaking and expects the listener, not to conform just because this is what it is, but to come to the realization that he is right, because the logic is so sound. No, they will tell you, this is what it is and this is what I think about it. He is all about the people and the society. The man is all Ti and has the capacity to transmit it with great skill and care with a strong Fe. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Sam Harris MBTI type.. Atleast all the INTJ's in that same position seem to be. It is no surprise to me that he is usually typed as an LIE (ENTj) within the socionics community. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. He doesn't try to state his opinions as facts (Te), but he carefully arguments himself and expects the internal logic (Ti) of his arguments to speak for themselves. In what regard is he about the people and society in which he lives.

. An INTJ could come to the same conclusion in their planning, a need to produce a calculated image and so forth, but once again the basic drive and motive would be vastly different from that of Harris resulting in a slightly different form of delivery. The way he is such an adept self-promoter while able to stay externally level-headed is evidence of him being an Extraverted Thinker to me, as well as an ENTJ type in MBTI. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. I mean how do you think all the great influencers of our history, who have been INFJ's have pulled it off. Jordan Peterson (INFJ) debate on the nature of truth. While at the same time taking his opponents into consideration and giving them time to speak etc. He is clearly focusing on being as impersonal as he can, while trying to compel the people to make a change. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. The arguments made below about Te being necessarily confrontational and non-negotiating are false. He is like a man walking on thin ice knowing it could crack at any moment. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. That's a really interesting interpreation Scotty. I could see him being an INTP, unless he seemed so capable and collected socially. You tell me, how can a guy who is seen as a racist, come off as the better person. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Sam Harris Myers-Briggs and personality type!. A heavy Te user wouldn't debate like he does, they would make hard and uncompromised statements rather than try to politely debate a person. But I do believe his awareness of his position inhibits him from going all out. This is exactly how he is. The agenda's behind an INTJ would be completely different. An INFJ in an insane position, all I'm sayin'. So even if the notion that Te is non-diplomatic is true, Harris confirms to that definition in this debate. I could see him as an unusually subtle and self-contained ENTJ or as an INTJ, but I haven’t yet decided if he meets the Jungian/MBTI criteria for introversion. He hopes he wouldn't have to rise to the barricades and split the planet in half. Good summation, imperator. And don't get me wrong, I don't think he is all impersonal. It would be more on point, less compelling and it would be impersonal in a manner of being cold, not impersonal in the manner of being mindful of the situation and giving space to others. And before you say Hitler or Gandhi, these guys had totally let gone of the idea of any consensus. However I do think that an INFJ of all the types are capable of having an objective in the outer world. On the contrary he does his very best to compel the people around him and does so in a gentle manner. So to the last drop, he tries to avoid conflict from happening. Now if you then imagine, that Harris would one day loose his cool, you think he would come off as a TJ.

Sam Harris
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server, so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!

MBTI enneagram type of Sam Harris Realm:

Category: Writers

Log in to add a comment.

Comments

Sort (descending) by: Date posted | Most voted