Sam Harris Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
And even if he was a more subtle INTJ, in the end all TJ's are confrontational rather than people who try to find a common ground. Yes, the negotiation you are talking about does happen, but that, in Jung's terms would be an "objective" focus, a sign of Extraversion rather than Feeling. So even if the notion that Te is non-diplomatic is true, Harris confirms to that definition in this debate. Both functions can confront and argue assertively, and both functions can placate and argue diplomatically. Hitchen's is trying to ram himself through, Harris is trying to negotiate with people and has insane patience in doing so. That's a really interesting interpreation Scotty. Even his moral worldview is an attempt to make morality scientific, factual, and logical. He is always trying to find common ground and says thinks such as "surely we can all agree, that there are universal moral principles". Now what is obvious he is no extravert so he must be an INFJ. Much better than I could explain. The agenda's behind an INTJ would be completely different. He doesn't really want conflict, he wants to find a mutual way for everyone to agree upon and that's what he's trying to build with his arguments, a bridge between the people. But I'm just saying. I'm just saying, the guy is a cuddly man inside, he radiates compassion. You could never imagine Sam Harris doing what Hitchens and Sanders are doing every time they open their mouths. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. Why couldn't an ENTJ play the role of the "cool-headed intellectual", or even be a "beta male" in general. Sam sounds like a soulless robot. You tell me, how can a guy who is seen as a racist, come off as the better person. He doesn't want to make everyone agree under his will because it is the best way of doing things, he wants everyone to be united and happy, because it makes the most sense. The difference lies in the approach taken. He has an insanely strong Ti propably the strongest of any INFJ's I have ever come across, however the subtle nuance that he is capable to handling conversations and social interaction could not be pulled off by an INTJ. And a ton of INFJs are probably mistyped (particularly male ones) so I wouldn't say they are a particularly influential type in history. I challenge anyone to analyze his interactions and tell me they could do a better job in at the same time disagreeing about everything on the rational level, while holding on to proper code of conduct and not giving anyone an excuse to attack him (Fe-Ti). I think we may over-think that he might be a ''male'' INFJ, when he's more likely just a polite INTJ. Harris is probably a calm tempered INTJ compared to the stereotypical hot tempered INTJ. I mean of all the guys speaking against Islam he is easily the most patient and collected.
. He seems to be more about simply getting at the truth of the matter unbiased (of course like everyone he is biased) rather than some Fe-like ideology he defends. Now ofcourse he is coming from an insane position, going against Islam and risking being seen as a total rasist etc. He is clearly focusing on being as impersonal as he can, while trying to compel the people to make a change. While at the same time taking his opponents into consideration and giving them time to speak etc. He is all about the people and the society. However I do think that an INFJ of all the types are capable of having an objective in the outer world. You can see him always extend to the people around him, giving them a chance to agree with him. He is building a Ti system of morals and ethics in his speaking and expects the listener, not to conform just because this is what it is, but to come to the realization that he is right, because the logic is so sound. He hopes he wouldn't have to rise to the barricades and split the planet in half. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Sam Harris MBTI type.. Arguments for both sides welcome. I think Harris is playing the audience and playing the people he is talking with, but I also think the agenda is based on compassion and a genuine desire for consensus. The second Harris realizes Peterson’s conception of truth is nestled within moral concerns and accumulated social norms, he stops talking about anything else and spends the remaining hour and a half trying to convince Peterson to adopt a more logical/factual conception of truth.
. You can't but be amazed by the level of his craft in doing so. I could see him being an INTP, unless he seemed so capable and collected socially. Harris is not the most sophisticated or nuanced academic (although intellectually honest) but that does not mean he isn’t a T type. This is exactly how he is. Like I said, just look at Hitchens. Now okay once again an INTJ could indeed remain highly impersonal and not give in to the frustrations of his Fi, but I believe the presentation would still be different. On the contrary he does his very best to compel the people around him and does so in a gentle manner. Most of what you're saying can be because he's an enneagram 1. For an INFJ the situation goes against the very grain of their existence, hence the level of focus in producing the exact image and behavior. I believe he would only do the same thing, but with more passion and a louder voice, which would be to keep on compelling people to change their minds, rather than outright telling them to do so. It doesn’t matter that he sometimes does this crudely — he almost always tries to. The distinction is this: Te constructs its arguments based on verifiable truths or truth arrangements, while Fe constructs its arguments based on norms, ethics, conscience, and understanding of interpersonal relations. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Sam Harris? What about enneagram and other personality types?. He is like a man walking on thin ice knowing it could crack at any moment. And before you say Hitler or Gandhi, these guys had totally let gone of the idea of any consensus. I mean the guy is basicly saying Islam sucks, which is a total taboo in the modern world of political correctedness. That is a paradox in itself and there's only a few answers. He doesn't try to state his opinions as facts (Te), but he carefully arguments himself and expects the internal logic (Ti) of his arguments to speak for themselves. It is no surprise to me that he is usually typed as an LIE (ENTj) within the socionics community. Now if you then imagine, that Harris would one day loose his cool, you think he would come off as a TJ. Being an INFJ, he would be aware of it to an insane degree. They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. And don't get me wrong, I don't think he is all impersonal. The arguments made below about Te being necessarily confrontational and non-negotiating are false. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Sam Harris likely is!. An INFJ in an insane position, all I'm sayin'. I could see him as an unusually subtle and self-contained ENTJ or as an INTJ, but I haven’t yet decided if he meets the Jungian/MBTI criteria for introversion. In what regard is he about the people and society in which he lives. But I do believe his awareness of his position inhibits him from going all out. So to the last drop, he tries to avoid conflict from happening. His way too concerned about the reactions of the people around him and proper code of conduct. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. Peterson repeatedly tries to build bridges with Harris and move the discussion forward without conceding, but Harris is relentless. Another example Karl Marx. Even if it was all calculated. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Sam Harris' belongs to!. However the way in which he presents himself is all Fe-Ti in my view. Similarly, saying Fe is necessarily non-confrontational and diplomatic is also false. And in other debates where he is more measured and diplomatic, he always proceeds from the cognitive orientation of facts-and-truth-above-all-else. Compared to Hitchen's who gets pissed off and openly shows his anger. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. Well okay you can make the argument that being all about the people and the society could be explained by being an enneagram 1 or just having such points of interest in life no matter the type. An ENTJ with greater intelligence than Rogan, would never end up being the Beta of the situation :P Especially in the overtly submissive manner of Harris in those interviews :P Once again he would be way more assertive and ballsy was he a Te user. INFJ's are the kind of people who would never try to tell anyone what it is or force themselves to anyone. Harris is trying to work the system from the inside. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. Harris is still hoping the situation can be solved through reasonable means when it comes to the general opinions of the society about the subject. Maybe that quote on CT sounds Fe but it's probably just a secular reason for morality and atheist are likely to gave such reasoning, either Fe or Fi in the way they sound, to prove that religion=/=morality. Under such circumstances I think INTJ's would be willing to be more ultimate. Another good example is Bernie Sanders, he doesn't debate, you hear him speak and his gonna tell you and he isn't afraid of conflict, he creates it and has the balls to do it despite his totally unorthodox position within the American framework of politics. INTJ's make statements, INFJ's negotiate. INTJ's being impersonal do not try to convince you to make a change, they don't try to negotiate with you about your existence, they don't give you a chance of having your own opinion while naively hoping you would realize it by yourself. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. Unlike these guys, he hasn't been pushed through the edge. Being an extraverted thinking type (Jung) or E + N + T + J (letter dichotomies) does not exclude this possibility. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. And they can both be highly impersonal if the situation demands it. You're either an INFP, an ISFP, an ISFJ or an INFJ. For an INTJ it wouldn't be a problem, because it's not like they are afraid of not having consensus or insulting somebody. Jordan Peterson (INFJ) debate on the nature of truth. I can't see him as an ENTJ based on his interviews on Joe Rogan Experience, they guy acts like a total beta male compared to the alpha of Joe Rogan. Now okay, this is my personal insight about the matter, but what I sense in Sam Harris is a guy who is in a ridiculous position and who's trying his best to still make it all good for everyone. And you can sense how he fears that any step might be the last one. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Sam Harris Myers-Briggs and personality type!. Huh I'm talking about his MBTI type, not some dubious male hierarchy bullshit. Watch the Harris (xNTJ) vs. He does not decimate his opponents like a TJ would, he makes them look bad next to his pitch perfect example, WHILE being a racist torwards the religion of Islam. Despite being totally against Islam I feel he radiates compassion, understanding and a hope we could all agree and find a reasonable common ground. No, they will tell you, this is what it is and this is what I think about it. NTJ makes sense, they love to appear non-biased while being biasedI don't quite see the Fe in the way he discuss things or in the reason. Atleast all the INTJ's in that same position seem to be. I mean come on guys, who could pull something like that off. Outwardly he's very cold and serious and he approaches things in a scientific and empirical manner. It would be more on point, less compelling and it would be impersonal in a manner of being cold, not impersonal in the manner of being mindful of the situation and giving space to others. There's no way he's a Ti user. I think by remaning as impersonal as possible, he is choosing the path of least conflict and greatest possibility for consensus. I'm not understanding the INFJ votes. I disagree with your analysis of Harris (Chomsky, an LII INTJ ran rational circles around him in an embarrassing exchange), but apart from that it seems like you would expect an INFJ to be more impersonal than an INTJ which to me just seems like a ludicrous concept to be working from. You can feel how every second he speaks, he senses the pressure he is surrounded with, so rather than poke the beehive, he speaks in the softest possible manner carefully choosing every word. Anyone snapping at Sam Harris comes off as the lesser intellectual or the man who's integrity was lower. You must remember that the position his coming from. A heavy Te user wouldn't debate like he does, they would make hard and uncompromised statements rather than try to politely debate a person. The man is all Ti and has the capacity to transmit it with great skill and care with a strong Fe. I don't get that same sense from INTJ's, even when they are being impersonal or having a poker face, there is something much colder behind those faces. I thought Chomsky was an INFJ aswell, but I have to admit I haven't watched many of his interactions :PWhat you are describing sounds like a strategic extroverted approach, focused as much on how he comes off to others as the ideas themselves. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. An INTJ could come to the same conclusion in their planning, a need to produce a calculated image and so forth, but once again the basic drive and motive would be vastly different from that of Harris resulting in a slightly different form of delivery. The MBTI questionnaire sorts people into one of 16 different personality types.. so it's not like he always succeeds in his endeavors. I mean how do you think all the great influencers of our history, who have been INFJ's have pulled it off. The way he is such an adept self-promoter while able to stay externally level-headed is evidence of him being an Extraverted Thinker to me, as well as an ENTJ type in MBTI. They have a strong Fe and it drives them to do stuff, most of the times, in a calculated manner. Wether Hitchens was INTJ or not, his aggresive style of reasoning shouldn't be the bar for every INTJ debater to compared to, and if he doesn't fit, he's INFJ. Or an angry Fi user for that matter. I just can't imagine Harris acting like an angry Te user. Good summation, imperator.
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!