Sign Up | Log in |

Scotty Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info

Scotty MBTI personality type cover chart

My reactions are more of impatience and a low attention span (I have been considered ADHD), than of a cognitive preference. This explains his belligerence and temper when people question his logic, and also explains why he's extremely dispassionate in every other circumstance. Otherwise, you're just giving a bunch of bullshit and trying to confuse the hell out of him for no reason. I have yet to see a well argued dismantling of CT. you do not really learn it. They are on record about their views on nature of typology & Jung quite clearly. INFP's that are created by TJ's tend to be rather narcissistic, psychotic and Nazis like me. Who gives a fuck what the correct typing thingy is. That's why I'd rather just talk about this stuff on neutral grounds and hope that eventually people come to their senses and CT's popularity shrivels away. CT church wouldn't survive with it's infidel idolaters. The core of type six is that they are out of touch with inner guidance. I do agree with most of it. Anyway, what I mean with objectivity is that though you might never be able to absolutely determine someone's type forever, some function descriptions, some arguments, etc. CT is special because they test for presence of tertiary and inferior functions and use that as a criteria for typing. All sites like traffic, what's the point.

. Ah typology is at best a general insight into very general outline of people's psyche. I am just questioning how valid that supposed observation is. They are not worth my precious time. Scotty is like a INxP he definitely uses Ne-Si - observe trends and think about the possibilities and make connections within the frame but hardly accepts exceptions. Lol, I'm definitely behind Anti-Scotty. Instead of that, there are too many disparities, people learn MBTI on their side, and do theories on their side. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Yes typology does have problem, you're assessment of it as complete bullshit is rather controversial. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Every person’s preference can be found on a spectrum, so just choose the letter you identify with most.. In fact we're nerds the lot of us. The typings that don't fit his theory reliably and consistently (i. The main practical use I see for MBTI is as a tool in the workplace and elsewhere for being able to take a certain test which explains personality diversity in somewhat simple terms. Jeez, the drama. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. I like it because, like Socionics, it integrates all 8 functions into the model rather than handwaving away 4 of them as "shadow functions. As Te matures, the user finds themselves steadily more able to source the resources they require to make their dreams a reality. Only a handful of people like Dario Nardi are taking this approach. Loyal to their peers and to their internal value systems, but not overly concerned with respecting laws and rules if they get in the way of getting something done. Detached and analytical, they excel at finding solutions to practical problems.. If people shifted their attention to writing more about letters, you'd have plenty of stuff to read. You're making it sound as if INFPs are incapable of having discussions without turning into nervous wrecks. He does occasionally have the interesting, useful insight though and he definitely does provide a unique perspective. Perhaps more facts about you. You have all the reasons to engage those fools. And since MBTI is a whole theory, if we want to be consistent with ourselves then we should use it at it purest form, but if im not mistaking what is widely spread today is a model with other people add-ons. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding Scotty Myers-Briggs and personality type!. Ok, I already know that, what's the point of taking a test to reconfirm this stuff. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Like when nobody is on this site and everybody's sleeping, you walk among people's pages, climb on arguments columns, and sleep on profile pictures. Scotty: The Showdown. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. What isn't a tangent is that this observational study actually provides a grounding in reality. I remember a now-deleted comment on H. All just externalized logic that was disconnected not only from itself, but from reality and trying desperately to tell me I was wrong about something when I wasn't while twisting themselves in logical knots. It's an observational study I assume, which is not perfect, nor the absolute truth (which you will continue to strawman me about). OP should really take what's back from the abyss on the edges of itScotty's page definitely became something worse than expected. Sounds absurd to me. I saw your cog functions in an image you posted here. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Use Big 5 for scientific measures. I'm very intrigued. If a bloody INTP is bum, lazy and with maturity begins to stop neglecting the repressed feelings and now has more responsibility is because the fucking Fe and Si are influencing of the shit development of INTP, your unlimited idiot. We have some of the best school results and stuff. Seems a bit dishonest to me that you're unwilling to demonstrate your claim. *chirps some more*Scotty paints in other what sould be seen in own. Organisations pay these people to tell how "creative", "organised", "commanding" their employees are. As Fe matures, its user will feel increasingly comfortable making and keeping emotional commitments to others, as they grow more confident in what is expected of them. @Xavi, I was never claiming that it was super scientific. I've actually had someone practically yelling in my face about how I am an INTJ due to how often I do so. But since people observe people through their own subjective lenses, you can claim it's objective evidence. Using deflections. @scotty, it's definitely not complete BS, there is enough in it to keep generations of scholars and general public interested in it, seems like you've personal stakes against them but that isn't my concern. CelebrityTypes mainly just rambles about their astrological function magic, and you can pay to see how their resident monkeys typed additional celebrities along with a side of fact-free content. @thedude, it makes no sense to say statistics are not related with Ti. The only thing I endorse on Truity are the Myers studies which it lists nicely at the end of each type description. CelebrityTypes function magic does not hold up to actual scrutiny any better than astrology. No need to move the goalposts and proclaim the impulsive reliance on facts a result of overactive inferior Te—inferior Te necessitates Fi, and there's little definitive evidence of Fi. I'm still curious about Scotty's ennea because the more I read him the more I see him as a 6w5. I do value efficiency in that regard, but that is not unusual. You can't just make up whatever. Leaving Scotty's very personal view on how MBTI works/should work, I can't help but notice how intellectually dishonest it is to type him INFP when the lead argument is that he uses Te methodology and lines of reasonings (or at least that's how you interpreted the "statistics" he uses). If he manages to keep his cool and engages in these discussions with less seriousness he'll do great. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. Ti understand that Te is necessary for development, Fi understands Te as something ''cruel and evil'', the way Scotty does. These humans are unhappy that like to wear masks and enter the illusion that the system in the comfort just to satisfy us and leave the fear of cruel reality. To call them on their BS however, you should try engaging them in a discussion or debate, that link's comment section is a good place to start. Scotty is probably an INFP with Si developed that demonstrates a inferior Te very aggressive and chaotic. Their "on record about their views" page makes it pretty clear that they are aware that what they are writing about is bullshit, and the rest of the site makes it pretty clear that they write about it anyway. CelebrityTypes just invents its own truth from function magic which often times is in direct conflict with reality. I'm Nazi sociopath INFP and I identify a lot with Dylan. To respond already to INFPs' favorite argument about "objectivity in subjective areas" (from my experience IRL or on other forums ) : i do agree there are specific cases where objectivity might exist , just like Einstein or Napoleon for example. As far I understand, 4w5 corelates with strong Feeling, 5w4 with strong Intuition, and 5w7 with strong Thinking. Scotty is INTP with Fe developed. You really have to be gullible to think that people work like that. Straw-manning them in a place where they can't even defend their position isn't a sign of integrity either. These humans are unhappy that like to wear masks and enter the illusion that the system in the comfort just to satisfy us and leave the fear of cruel reality. I understand what you mean scotty and I agree. They seek out substitutes for their inner-guidance that they can reference internally for counsel, direction and advice. You don't look like someone who'd shy away from a small challenge. Things they could access on their own btw. Additionally, the notion that an INTP wouldn't use facts and statistics to justify propositions is absurd. They have some of the highest average results in the school system and professions best fitted for them is stuff like college professors and psychologists. Unending circles. You're right, but you seem to make statistics the proof and basis of your thinking, in a very efficient way, when Ti would start from a very develop theory (not facts, even though observation plays a good part in it, it still is one's perspective) and use the numbers for what they are (just numbers) being able to make them say anything. Unhealthy inferior Fi. Yup, INFP's inferior function, people, so in short, their "blindspot" in decision-making processes. Imams of truity however can tell all of your traits in 15 minutes just for a few dollars with a claim that it's 100% scientific, empirical, provides 72 virgins. I'm not saying it's necessarily possible to know someone's type for sure when I say there is objectivity, and quite often I argue for humility, for example when I say Murakami may very well be an INFJ for various reason - or even just how I set up my arguments. There are many nebulous cases where honestly, who can say which type is better "objectively". I'm no sensor or judger, that much is for sure, you can try to work your function magic to your heart's content. However, it is noted Fi coming from his comments when he disagrees with something or think you read something wrong, which is not like Scotty,This asshole made the whole page bold. But I'm not you and you probably know yourself. Typology on the internet, on CT, even official MBTI is full of flaws, ungrounded claims, studies that don't match up with rigorous methods of statistics. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. Myers study has no scientific validation but because it suits your faith, it is the truth. Interest in something does not make it not bullshit. It is senseful. Statistics are close to "in your face" evidence that do no fit INTP in my opinion, but I may be wrong. The people follow. So, in order to deal with MBTI functions, the best way is 1) to recognize that it's not objective from a scientific perspective. You and CT guys can debate it out and demonstrate how their way is bullshit. And since I must repeat myself: where are the arguments for Fi and Ne. For example it truly seems to be the case that Ne users move their eyebrows a lot when they talk. I also love how people reject Jung's books because they are "bullshit" in favour of it's simplistic bullshit in form of MBTI manual that's designed to please people with an aim to squeeze the money out of them. Nope, not buying it no friends, try again. You could go and claim a vast amount of people are mistyping but when the vast majority of people type based on an MBTI test, you end up with a huge rift between function magicians who have their own idea of how types work, and people who take the test. Probably Sp/SxMy problem with function magic is mainly due to it leading to incorrect conclusions. We are not special, we are only human beings made of rotten and weak organic material. I fear being perceived as incompetent by others. And "humour" is setting off my spellcheck. @Jamz, why would an INTP be expected to discard a tighter method. Pretty much, but those are more expectations of their strength, and the "average INTJ" is pretty much equal in everything within those tiers. As for why I call function magic "magic", it's because falls in the same trap as astrology or palm reading or other forms of magical thinking. I'd watch out for your comments on their page I shared though, in case you reconsider not chickening out. It is an imprecise measure of human behavior, this has been extensively empirically proven. Manecleis, I disagree. Make magic functions great againScotty, My dear. It was an over the top reaction to someone (not on this site) who was using Te really stupidly and frustrating me with it. Thinking – Feeling, represents how a person processes information. Thinking means that a person makes a decision mainly through logic.. No, that's how I see you. I don't *feel* like an INTJ at all but this person was convinced that I fit the full model. People use different tools to type , so what's the objective judge in all that. But anyways we really have no reason to doubt him that much. Hence why I found the INTJ hypothesis interesting. The empirical backing of the letters does not back function magic. Socially he's also a fun, interesting and vital part of this community. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about Scotty MBTI type.. They are aware of limitations of their field. I don't like this new avatar. You're wasting energies on a dead subject. Scotty, I found this paper that actually seems to support your 4-tier system, you may find it interesting: https://www. Fucking scholars. It's not a matter of being down-to-earth but rather being accurate and coming to accurate conclusions. Using a language that is not your main can lead into unconscious redundance. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. You know, that cat that goes in the kitten's door, walks on the furniture, sleeps on the cushions. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. You're constantly strawmanning them. How about that. Jung also proposed that in a person one of the four functions above is dominant – either a function of perception or a function of judging.. We shouldn't fall into a tactic old as humanity. " I somewhat agree with you. FM is using presence of a naturally repressed function as justification for a type, or absence of that function as a justification against a type. ) So, I guess Scotty is a well-articulated INFP within what he likes. I think you're mixing certainty with objectivity here. Then you are probably an INTP with strong traces of Fe. Because having incorrect beliefs is supposed to bother. And that's just the stuff that HASN'T been deleted yet. You use arguments ''magic function'' because you is a moron who does not accept different arguments, you just think that if a ISTP start to be interested in abstract subjects and strategy you will simply say that it is a INTx because the damn stereotype, fuck you your fool. Anyone with a working brain can see the foundations of their function magic are astrological/anecdotal. Like this site was made so Scotty could have a place to hang around. Self-identified INTJs are generally more Si-ish than INTPs, and INFPs are generally more Fe-ish than INTPs. Scotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. He reminds me of many INTPs I know. ”Even if he shows Te-users behaviors, I think his Fi behaviors only comes on stress, as I said, he has very Fi-ish threats, but, If we come with something deeper, INTPs can develop very well their superego functions, and, show them in stress/shadow behaviors, thats what could happen with his Fi, the fact that he comes very pissed off is really threaten by a 'undertaken function that comes like a zombie'(. I relate to both Ti and Fi, but Ti more. As far I can see, one can defend functions the same way one defends philosophical assertions.

. So I disagree that Scotty is INFP in any form or fashion. I do see Te over Ti in your posts. "Manecleis: I don't know what you're talking about, I never did type Scotty anything. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type Scotty likely is!. They are habitually uncertain about things they have every reason to be certain about. (like type dynamics). They are extroverted, idealistic, charismatic, outspoken, highly principled and ethical, and usually know how to connect!. Maybe because whoever it was just read this: http://mbti-databank. Do I need to explain why this feels very wrong to me. The real blank-eyed, do-gooders are ISFJs, ESFJs, etc. The same with typing people by letters. He could be ISFJ imo. If i'm not mistaking, it is even said that the only means to be sure of someone type is through professional test. Always makes about him. I think 6w5 for Scotty is a really good point and I have to agree. Are you talking about my letter-to-functions mapping. When you talk about "inferior Te" you are, at the very least, typing him IxFP. @butterfly : I think you didn't get well my point. You mean sites like CelebrityTypes, who take money from their faithful and feed them bullshit in return. Saying "there are typings objectively better than others" means either there is this objective consensus evidence based or there ultimately is this sure typing that the more you are close to the better the typing is. Possible spamming: 5 ESTJ votes. Their emotional life is largely unconscious and the average INTP gets by either awkwardly trying to rationalize social situations OR just "going with the flow" in a grossly hypocritical manner (Inferior Fe). ''Sixes are the ultimate doubters. You both are intelligent and more than capable of intelligent discussion. :-(Scotty, even you disappointed me and making me to shame, you are my son; you are a Lannister. Scotty that is an original source, that's correct but it's not known for validity. The inferior-Te monologue (prior to maturation): “I have many goals I want to accomplish but often have trouble tangibly setting them into motion. Scotty, i'm ESFP with Te developed. But I don't know much on this matter so feel free to correct me. :PScotty's strong reactions are Te ("How can't you see it. It is more common Fi's hate Te function than Ti's. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'Scotty' belongs to!. Evidence climbing up for ESFJ actually. Their type tests actually look for the PRESENCE rather than the ABSENCE of inferior functions, which gets it ass backwards. Not usually nurses and primary school teachers, etc. You don't seem to trust most of this site things such as spams or alt accounts, which often are made by one dimensional as it first but later developed reasonings. Sheep-like behavior is the mechanism. Who said INTPs need to tolerate stuff that contradicts reality. The inferior-Fe monologue (prior to maturation): “Feelings make me freeze with anxiety because I don’t know how to moderate them. Believe me I've asked around. theory-then-fact (subject -> object). Anyway I guess I think I know where this will lead. And I build that much off analysis of my own cognition. I must disagree. See you can then demonstrate how functions are magic and that Myers attempt to convert that magic into something credible is much better than the underlying theory. Well I guess this is what these PD profiles have devolved to. Truity is just a mirror of Myers studies. You could always write your arguments here and I could argue on your behalf. If every disagreement about someone's type or what a function means ends with, "Well, that's just your MBTI system," though, how can I know that I'm not just seeing Ne to unconsciously protect my eyebrow theory. Self-aware bullshit spew is no better than self-unaware bullshit spew. You'd rather repeat your comments here than send them packing with your irrefutable case. We are not special, we are only human beings made of rotten and weak organic material. If you have a strong idealistic value in what you do and see as something transcendental for yourself where will dispertar enormous feelings of satisfaction to be able to do, it's because you're probably INFP. 6 often have that insecure emotionality to them that Scotty might mistake for being a 4. Scotty, the ISTP or INTJ hypothesis are actually interesting and worth investigating. Then again most "MBTI test" sites are full of these positive affirmations. @butterfly consistency is idiosyncratic in a world of inconsistency, and I understand your bullshit system (which is NOT MBTI) perfectly fine. If that makes me an ISTJ 6 then so be it, but I know that ISTJ doesn't fit me at all from really any definition. You've plenty of time, ample vocabulary and sure ideas to argue them. Types can't be proven and therefore traits and functions stacks can't be made for them. As long as the language used is universal and people are having fun it's all great. It's all for fun mostly. I'm not sure if you're actually serious, but anyway: Imo it seems like Scotty has his own system (Ti+Ne) and since people don't respond to it, he gets mad and expresses it childishly by being difficult and douchy (Inferior Fe). Properly used data can help clear out the bullshit that has brewed from countless iterations of rehashing function magic theories, and everyone coming up with their own interpretations of function magic. I'm glad you appreciated it. If one is ok with that, 2) we should then try to see if it rests on a logical, step-by-step basis. Search 'scotty' and see how much shit comes up. That is just communication. I have problems with CT too but honestly all the anti-CT stuff I see is mostly hot air. I guess I fell right into your trap then, is that more aspie or retard. Also my focus in typing bias doesn't stem from unfairness, but from that the way people type here doesn't match at all with MBTI test results. So, MBTI is not empirical. @shahenshah all-in is fighting to get it French again x)And the French side is looking very un-French. Upon doing this he will RIDICULE the commonly accepted stuff (and people who use it [for example referring to me as an insect and astrologer on multiple occasions]), displaying and freely admitting that he does not understand any of it properly (which is what I mean when I say he doesn't understand MBTI). If you are still in doubt, read this: http://mbti-notes. What is the best option for the MBTI type of Scotty? What about enneagram and other personality types?. Meaning, there should be a standardization of knowledge among typers. People now think you are me, scotty. You can tell them that's not true. I think he cares a lot about his typing method to a personal level while an INTP would be more doubtful and discard his method faster( maybe to a fault). I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assStephen Hawking, is that you. Pay a hefty sum and they'll tell you how incredible you are. She's a cookie cutter, Starbucks drinking, Ugg boots wearing basic ass bitch. I'm proud to be a Machiavellian INFP. If you think that is an example of you understanding people then you are just wrong. It's a perfect reality check for function magicians who may be deluded into thinking that INTPs have more "Si" traits than INTJs, for example. It is used by truity and similar sites to attract people who seek positive affirmation. 6w5 reasonings are linear and one dimensional as it first. Te of INFP's serve as individual supplement and little external focus. I hate people because all are stupid, empty, superficial and find the center of the universe. Looking at scores from Dario's function test that I've seen posted, it is really an extreme rarity to see someone actually appear to fit on an axis, defined by having either the top two perception or judging functions being opposite. You are aware it's no UFO theory. I mean, this is the reason a lot of people find INTPs quite unpleasant. ^^I don't agree with the "Scotty doesnt understand MBTI" or "is bad at reading people". "CelebrityTypes function magic does not hold up to actual scrutiny any better than astrology" - In that case I'm sure you'll be able to demonstrate how. That's not logical. And I have done that, and you can too. Church of CT with it's hocus pocus has nothing to say in front of truths of Truity. So you have time to rehash the same statements against on all pages of MBTI Databank but you can't find time to write one cohesive comment on their website. Infidels must be destroyed. We should also ditch the claim that it has scientific validity and use it as a tool for entertainment as I do. It creates conclusions/outputs that have no business being made from the available facts/inputs. I think the 3 test results I have obtained are: INTP, INFP, ISTP. And honestly I don't think 4w5 INTP is possible like 5w6 INFP isn't possible. You don't have to discard things completely. Honestly, the goal for me citing statistics is to provide potentially relevant data that people can use to adjust their thinking, not so much in the scope of the character being discussed, but in a more general sense too. Ironically, while in nearly every other case I object to Scotty's use of the word "function magic," it seems like some of you guys actually are applying function magic to Scotty himself so as to avoid the pseudo-contradiction of an INTP who isn't cool-headed or Socratic. Briefly speaking, Thee to INFP serves to organize more to himself than to organize the inner world and control Fi. There is also a guarantee of 72 virgins after death. For example, you have someone take a MBTI test and get INTP or figure out that Ti and Ne make sense for their top two functions. If there really is a preferred function they will speak for themselves leaving no need to look at inferior functions. The problem I have nowadays is with axis typing and that is mainly because all evidence seems to show that functions don't come in pairs (you are on one axis or the other). I hate people because all are stupid, empty, superficial and find the center of the universe. Why do you insist on bringing up the mirror's name. There's also a strong lack of respecting other people's individuality regarding what typing system they choose, all in the name of being down-to-earth. Where is the research backing of CelebrityTypes function magic. @scotty Their comment section is public, you have ideas, use them there. I find scotty gregarious, cheerful and a people's person. Winds of faith blowing. I also agree with you that a lot of the additions to MBTI, like lower function grips and physical cues, are dubious, but the reason I've come to trust the parts I do is because I have had so many experiences where they seem on the spot and many agree with me and rely on these cues as well. I've seen you state several times that objectivity exists in MBTI butterfly. It's only compared to types like INTJ an INFP is "too passionate". How actual people self reporting these positive traits is even half truth. 20 foot hurdle to jump over for an INTP but some goofy thing about "personal attachment" which might as well be a fabrication that he accepts as reason for being Fi dom. I made the same mistake earlier in the thread but corrected myself, realizing that what I interpreted as Fi was actually an individualist, hotheaded manifestation of Ti. They won't be doing anything absurdly wrong, and you won't really be able to tell what their real type is without extensive observation; they are just doing everything an INTJ is doing just slower and less of it usually, and they are miserable about holding all their feelings back and ignoring the ones of others. Also it is tough to relate my logic because it is internal and not pre-packaged. Probably never will. Scotty scotty SCOTTY. And it has a huge advantage over Big 5 because it is way more popular/widespread/known and its axes are much "nicer" in word choice, so people won't build superiority complexes about being more "conscientious" or whatever. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. It's a good deal for believers. I'm Nazi sociopath INFP and I identify a lot with Dylan. Re: function magic. Under stress, they have no trust in their ability to independently know and compulsively fixate on demanding proof. Only Anti-Scotty (Butterfly) was strawmanning me about that. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Personality Databank characters list.. What i always say is, an insult is only one when the person attacked feels insulted. He is pretty obsessive on measuring stuff up to "reality" and rejecting purely abstract concepts which is not how IxFPs act. Really, I'm tired of explaining to you, your retarded autistic. You can observe people and see for yourself if the model satisfies your observations, but since this is not done in a systematic, rigorous way, you can only defend it for yourself. It will never be scientific sadly. For me though typology is a dead subject. I agree that an INFP is more likely to get angry at Te users but an INTP can too for different reasons. And between 4w5 and 6w5 it's clear which enneagram would rather be seen as down to earth rather than imaginative. If they are to transpose their test score into function magic interpretations, they will end up with tons of misinformation, because a different process is assumed for the function magic descriptions (typing based on functions) versus the method they used to type themselves (based on the test). My problem with Scotty is that he rejects a lot of the most commonly accepted additions to MBTI, like tertiary and inferior functions, and adds things like that an INTP is going to have more Te than an INFP. After all, your way to talk or respond is purely some kind of counterphobical 6 that makes us think that your gut fix is 1. I haven't seen one critical affirmation of the study. PS: I think it's possible to use some kind of axis model without going full retard on FM. As an inferior function, Te originally manifests as the inability to set one’s external desires or plans into motion. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. No explanation. Again, not tackling the problem. What has more importance is for Scotty to have a site he calls a home. You have him typed as INFP, these have to be the main points. When in reality they actually share a lot with people of the 15 human types. Te-grip INFP is honestly just a second-rate INTJ. when did i say you were not intp. :Cognitive functions and Buddhist schools). I'm wondering what the fudge about offensive pages targeting Scotty, too. Make magic functions great againYOURE LITERALLY A FUCKING MONKEY GO BACK TO AFRICA YOU FUCKING GORILLASTFU YOU YARD APE PIECE OF SHITSomething about not being Ti, what that was supposed to mean I don't know though. ( trick question, the answer is no one, if someone can say by himself this is better than this then it isn't objectivity, objectivity doesnt come from people, it comes from the outside world). @bobnickmad, I'd rather say nothing than a mess of information which hasn't been shown to have any validity. I see a clear difference between his offshoot and Moolfreet's in that Moolfreet's system is fluid and alters itself arbitrarily to fit the specific individual, while Scotty's system is rigid and generalized, hence why he objects to in-his-view "edgy" typings. ") and his typings are about fighting stereotypes which is Fi stuff ("yet another proof consensus is just sheep-talk"). He's really passionate about his typing method and he even show unassertiveness and passive-aggressive behaviors sometimes but he doesn't lose the logical point and he comes very pissed off when illogical typings appears. I can't reconcile some of the most basic things about these 4 function kits with my own inner self. I can see INTP. " Bobnickmad: "Imo, lower Te makes more sense than Ti-dominance. Some of of the people on the 5w4 page who claim that INTPs are more likely to be 5w6 also demonstrate these kinds of stereotypes in their reasoning. INFPs are still intellectualists at heart and reasonably good at it. And the function magic IS very important to cover, because it is the foundation of their tests. Also, there IS evidence of inferior Fe, and it being overactive (which fits perfectly with INTP 4—as a 4, his Fe fused with his Ti and turned it into pseudo-Fi). I hope you vote for my friend TrumpScotty - The best INFP retardad who think is INTPI got used to the funny bunny. I hate people because all are stupid, empty, superficial and find the center of the universe. I think scotty's J and S are his strongest dichotomies. Oh well, it's entertaining@scotty Are you "Neutral Party" XD If you are then GET A FUCKING LIFE. I don't think 99% of scotty's votes are INxP. Check "recent inscriptions" and figure. Jesus every other page on this site is filled with anti-CT stuff. And also the mbti and enneagram measure different things anyways. @Scotty, INFP's and INTP's may look like a lot, especially if the INFP is more assertive and promote knowledge that is usually the Ti function is more common inside. I wasn't referring to the literal sense of the word, as you already know. It differs between people, because not all INTJs are the "average INTJ". He no shows traces of Fi and Te; He shows no strong idealism in the comments and when it unfolds and demonstrate different options gives it does not use objectivism or sarcasm as many INFP's tend to do; He simply tries to expose the logic of his argument and there is no extreme changes when someone is talking about something he does not agree. I think Scotty could be more of a 6 really. Lately it has all gone haywire. And it's completely free. These humans are unhappy that like to wear masks and enter the illusion that the system in the comfort just to satisfy us and leave the fear of cruel reality. No, it's like if I made a site about UFOs and had one page on there talking about how dubious their existence is, and then built the rest of the website around detailing some space alien conspiracy involving UFOs. However, I'd say these people are in the minority, and the majority of users on this site seem to have a good understanding of INTPs, from my experience. pdfFugoff ENFP, I was here first. What does that make them. Autistic bitch misleading the retards about my voice recording. You who tink that is funcion magic because YOU is the bitch of Jung theory. I meant of course adult ADHD. So, the function's big problem is a question of proof, while the Big 5 and MBTI by letters the problem is a question of usefulness. Instead of being dishonest with yourself, you should actually tackle the problem face on. The way he comes across online makes him appear ISTJ subtype Ne. If he is so confident he should argue them actually. That doesn't suggest that typology is BS, that's your unproved assertion which i am asking you to prove. Not bad if you need such affirmation. Evaluating and judging people is just HARD. Gods of topology have revealed themselves. I trust his INTP typing but he comes very ISTJ-Ne ish to me. Also, the functions can be individualized. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. If someone's religion is telling them to drain their blood to cure cancer, should we "respect their beliefs". As for Big 5, it hasn't really made it into pop psychology at all, but people do write about it. @ruby I'd even go as far as to say CT recognizes their system is complete bullshit, but they also realize that there is a sucker born every minute. But the flat out false thing is stuff like "INTPs will demonstrate more 'Si' than ISTPs or INTJs"@bobnickmad: I'm not defending the scientific validity of MBTI. @iamjoey well you did say you have high amount of Se, so ESTP isn't way off, right. @Xavi, they aren't *invalid* so much as *limited*. Calling them out on their bullshit on their own site will discourage what you call their fellow magicians. Truth is with the imams of Truity (and similar sites) though. Yeah, I think so. Seems like a cult that guarantees affirming all it's followers just a few dollars. One can display Fi traits despite displaying more Ti traits. The more models we use the the closer we get a picture to reality because every model has limitations. Scotty fears the different and only trust the same authorities Jung - being that it was not 100% sure and there several neuroscientific theories that demonstrate how the brain is constantly cognitive change - typical demonstration Si acting against Ne. It is you who has a bias AGAINST typing people as certain types, in fact a strong bias against INxP, because you type by some really stupid stereotypes rather than anything even remotely systematic, and then justify your stereotyping by your OWN idiosyncratic mess (pot calling kettle black anyone. I think your unwillingness only shows that you're unsure of your own self. You follow your one dimensional function order and typing by dichotomies, which is another one dimensional framework, which later you develop to the environment. There's a bazillion sites that give regular MBTI tests by the letters, but not CT. What is hilarious are the double standards you use, firstly ridiculing an observational study for a) not being "scientific enough", and b) for the site its results are mirrored on, and then a few minutes later go on to wonder why people aren't more into Jung's ramblings. Nice aspie humour. Or in reverse, you can't figure out if someone is INTP (Ti-dom) or INFP (Fi-dom) so you check to see if they have more Fe-ish (INTP) or Te-ish behaviors (INFP), and then as a result use that label to invent facts about them (that they are Thinking or Feeling dominant). I had long discussions on this subject. Your strong functions are going to repress their opposite weaker opposite functions. Entertaining purposes, stupid fuckerYou were all over me this morning FAGGOT so don't sass me. Also you certainly can't expect all the functions on Tier 2 or Tier 3 to be equal. What about a 641 tritype. Anyway, even in their "MBTI for Skeptics" article, they fall back on MBTI (the letter based test with 4 dichotomies) in most cases when it comes to defending "MBTI" from stuff like accusations of it being bullshit. Since he is the only one who understands his ivory tower stuff, constantly going around adding new stuff to it, he can just fly around here, feel self-satisfied and call everyone stupid in childish Inferior Fe outbursts. The question that should be posed is: what does one use MORE of, Ti or Fi. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. ESTP kids are ADHD poster boys of course. INTPs are not robotic logic generators, but usually are really funny, fluid and assured in their ways of thinking (not in their way of believing or conviction like Fi users). You've all the firepower ready, I just wish you use it on them. The function axes make perfect sense but Scotty would rather use the word ''function magic'' in a very condescending manner to feel superior to anyone who doesn't accept his system. You can use it as a hint or whatever when you treat it like what it is: an inferior function. Not to say, but he gives me a strong ISTJ vibe, thing that could be explained by the 6w5. So, except for other people to decide your worth on them in a shallow manner, with what they help you as a person. Shut up INTP loser and bow to ENTJ greatnessThis used to be a quiet, peaceful place with interesting discussions and respectful disagreements. The running assumption in this thread notwithstanding, this doesn't preclude scotty's being logical or being nice (all types can be both). It really notice that their arguments are to attempt to show the logic calmly and patient even with the debate developing rather, I believe a INFP to expose your main idea and realize that it is being ignored would end up exposing more Te and speak more objectively and could even use sarcasm. There is little to no research on them for the moment on cognitive functions. "Basically, if my understanding is correct, Scotty believes that people have four tiers of equally-developed functions rather than a hierarchy from most developed to least developed. And as a presumptive ISTP, I'm a minority and I get special treatment anywayLol, what happened on his page. Where is the objectivity in MBTI. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. theory; it's fact-then-theory (object -> subject) vs. Scotty seems like a good guy, to bad he can be such a spiteful, mean bunny at times. I can understand how typology isn't perfect or a hard science at all but calling it astrology demands a proper demonstration. In my sense he perfectly understands what MBTI is and after having seen the obvious flaws (at least with the typing way "commonly" known) chose to adopt a particular attitude to reduce them to a minimum. Two Fi users can have very different values and see themselves in different ways, two Ti users can have very different logic frameworks in which they judge the world. Scotty doesn't seem like he's in the grip of Te; he just seems too impatient to explain his system in depth. If he is an INFP, where is the Fi evidence. I am ESFP with Te developed and i gonna fuck your assScotty, fuck you, your racist who think N is more inteligent than S. Give that to your whorish online girlfriends@scotty I apologize for Bonita's cuntiness. Types are not binary. lord scotty trascends. Hey, Scotty, when does the bunny will return. My problem with stuff like The Big 5 or typing people by the letter (I vs E, S vs N, T vs F, J vs P) is that it seems pretty pointless. Just a suggestion. Join me Scotty. We are not special, we are only human beings made of rotten and weak organic material. People fighting over how valid their way of typing is quite funny. What type of woman do you think I am. Most of his arguments are good especially when he engages with the other persons' viewpoints as well.

Scotty

MBTI enneagram type of Scotty Realm:

Category: Politicans and Leaders

Series/Domain: Personality Databank

TOTAL MBTI VOTES: 82


INTP - 39 vote(s)
INFP - 17 vote(s)
ESTJ - 13 vote(s)
INTJ - 4 vote(s)
ISTJ - 4 vote(s)
INFJ - 2 vote(s)
ISFJ - 2 vote(s)
ISTP - 1 vote(s)

Log in to vote!

TOTAL ENNEA VOTES: 42


5W4 - 17 vote(s)
4W5 - 11 vote(s)
6W5 - 5 vote(s)
9W1 - 5 vote(s)
3W4 - 2 vote(s)
5W6 - 2 vote(s)

Log in to vote!

Log in to add a comment.

Comments

Sort (descending) by: Date posted | Most voted