The most thinking feeler Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
The most thinking feeler is clearly a gifted ESFP racist like me. In the case of a logical kind, as I know how to act emotionally or sentimentally in relation to realize another as logically necessary to build my goals. How can I do something right if I know not logically discern right from wrong. I have an IQ 173. Anyway, if we take the theory, this would only be possible with the passage of time (probably more for the 30-40 years), but I believe that there are certain people who, to adapt, end up developing prematurely. But that's a different subject. Ni in itself is a function very precise and accurate, Fe serves to capture the feeling and external Ti to rationalize. I'm sociopath. I have an IQ 173. You'll pay for your sins Nazi. Otherwise they are poles apart in their approaches. Male INFJs are extremely, extremely rare and I think quite a few famous male INFJs aren't actually INFJ but just a theory of mine. @Bonita: All types can arrive at the same conclusion. More of a wash than I would've expected so I guess you can go either way. I know a INTJ that exhibits an Se enough revelante and unusual (had times I sent him to do a test to see if he identified with ISTP, but he said no), he says he loves to fight and feels quite well with this and the practice of physical exercise and focus on now is to relieve the stress of information and thoughts, thus making it able to better manage yourself and have more focus on now to control the expansion of intuitive information and avoid problems that several Ni dom complain. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. But going by your argument INFPs and ESTJs can be alike if ESTJs have high Fi. At some point the Se will be more important than the Ni, knowing can he still be considered as an INTJ. INFP's were 34% 4w5 and 8% 5. "Every T is smart is false why if so Ts would not like to contradict," we would have to define a static hierarchy of intelligence, which does not occur. In your case an INTJ who would need/want to improve his Se skills would train his brain to a better use of his inferior function area. They both have this scholar quality. What happens is that many types try need to use the inferior function as a supplement, but would not change the hierarchic order, would only learn to improve more and be more skilled in what was bad - that's where neuroplasticity would go. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. is obviously an antisocial ESFP that has its shadow INTJ quite exposed. Well I actually changed my mind on Lynch, and now think he's a (weird) INFP. My vote definitely for INFP. The point i want to establish here is that what you say isn't viable at long term at all. But, come on, everyone can realize thinking states. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I can make a similar vague statement and pretend it has deeper meaning than it actually has. The INFJs I've encountered have typically in a lot of instances struggled to handle their feelings and it has resulted in a very outward explosion of emotions. Anyway, it's a theory that is obviously not absolute and can no exceptions. Not necessarily, however, my inferioes functions are influencing me to seek such a balance as I feel I need it and am really strong desire to have such a development, that is, they serve as a supplement, as an aid point, when I'm in a bad situation or need to do something in which only my Fi-Ne would not be useful, they will me help because I am training me for this, but that does not mean stop being an INFP, just I will be a INFP you're doing complementary use of its functions to follow something in which I feel I need and appreciate [Fi]. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. Obviously INFJ. The most thinking feeler. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'The most thinking feeler' belongs to!. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I'm an INFP with Te developed. Probably neuroscience is more interesting and is to this area that will go deeper to see if I can get some conclusion. But I'm tired of arguing, see you around. I'm sociopath. The most thinking feeler is clearly a gifted ESFP racist like me. There's about 22% INFP 9's compared to 12% INFJ 9's so while I don't think they seem that thinky there are quite a few more INFP's in that department. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I have an IQ 173. As far as i know there is no correlation established at all between Jungian functions and the brain so i would be glad to be corrected if i've missed some information about that. So I think it could go both ways because on one hand INFPs are typically more in touch with their emotions, which would suggest they're the more "feeling" of the two types, and on the other hand INFJs typically struggle more with dealing with their emotions which I have found often manifests as a very outward display of feelings.
. People try to reduce the flaws by adding other theories (loop, grip, axis etc). Their thoughts are just more connected with their identity and feelings. Jung theorized that the dominant function acts alone in its preferred world: exterior for extraverts and interior for introverts..
. Ni in itself is a function very precise and accurate, Fe serves to capture the feeling and external Ti to rationalize. The truth is that it is so great to take as absolute and deny other ideas that serve to complement when it found some flaws. Most of them can actually pass for cold thinkers on the outside, while INFPS as dreamy and Ne-ish as they may be, do not have this cold and detached way of examining things. I guess NFJs may appear as more "thinking" in the same way that NTJs may appear as more thinking than NTPs. From what I understood from INFJ youtubers, when they're out from social interactions and don't to use their Fe, they go into heavy intelectualizing Ni-Ti mode. I'm sociopath. What is the best option for the MBTI type of The most thinking feeler? What about enneagram and other personality types?. Lets suppose there is an area of the brain which uses Ni, another which uses Se. Again, I'm still opposed to the idea of people seeing male INFJs as demonstrative on a feeling level (I mean in general, not with their close friends or in a particular environement, like a stage etc. The only thing you can say when you base your explanation on neuroplasticity is that you can develop an inferior function for a short amount of time but it wouldnt be relevant anymore in this thread. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I'm sociopath. I'm an INFP with Te developed. INFP intellectuals don't feel the need to separate their own entity from what they are intellectualizing. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type The most thinking feeler likely is!. And I got this conclusion by observing some people and as such influence functions the top (we can also apply the enneagram in the middle, because I believe there are trends). You'll never see an ESTP losing sleep over being called stupid but these IN types can't handle it. You're right about female INFJs. I have an IQ 173. What famous male INFJ would you confirm though. Fi is an introverted process so I find that once emotions are expressed by Fi doms, they tend to be more thoroughly thought out and therefore appear more rational. The most thinking feeler is clearly a gifted ESFP racist like me. Then neuroplasticity works here on your prefered functions and neglect the inferiors ones. INFPs are artistic, deductive and know rationalize things internally more than INFJ's. The INFPs 9s I know do seem more thinky and rational than your average 4. I'm sociopath. This site is full of bugs. INFP's are spoiled and utopian beings. Anyway, one INFP can indeed appreciate the logic and get rationalize things that interest you using trends and analysis in which are considered, estátisitcamente speaking, logic thus inducing conclusions, not to mention that are also great to deduct metaphors. However, the fact that feeling is the auxiliary function in INFJs rather than the dominant function is certainly a valid point in voting for INFJ. Similarities between INFPs and INTPs is more about their extraverted perception and sometimes good Si function. It's been said many times that both INTPs and INFPs reach to the same conclusions but through different paths. INFP's tend to be more realistic too. I'm not that familiar with many (especially living). I personaly think all this is a little of a try hard attitude. Well, there really is a complement to the higher self to continue practicing correctly. Its just a theory which explains somethings but not everything as it is obviously flawed. Obviously INFJ. I still haven't figured out what "most thinking" means. True INFPs are not very fond of intellectuals. INFJs and ISFJs are the right answer, their tertiary Ti often making them appear as Ti dom or IxTJ. But since MBTI is based on opposites, you can easily assume that if he trains his Se area, his Ni area will be completely neglected and then while the Se area develops, the Ni's one will regress. INFP's are not logical and repress the rationale for having lower Te. The most thinking feeler demonstrates strong social and manipulative abilities [Se-Te] a INTx are very quiet and do not know manipulate and persuade equal ESxP's. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. The most thinking feeler. Few can leave the stereotype, but thanks to friends or family xxTJ's that teach about how the world works. I'm an INFP with Te developed. is obviously an antisocial ESFP that has its shadow INTJ quite exposed. I guess the INTJs have a "louder" form of thinking so maybe INFJs will look more thinky. Obviously INFJ. INFJ's seem to be the most thinking of feelers. MBTI isn't a system with solid scientific bases. I have an IQ 173. The more you use your brain to do something, the easier it will be to perform this specific task (the brain establishes more neuronal connections ). According to the self-reports on Thoughtcatalog which gave a good sample size, INFJ's were 23% 4w5 and 12% 5. It is important to understand that:. All types should love me and follow me for my sacrifices. This is all just my personal experience based off encounters with people I know though and it could really go either way. I'm sociopath. Ie logical types, by logic, are lame unrelated to the feeling and so can stick to illogical things through a seemingly logical rationalization mechanism and not a sentimental type can be ethical without being inconsistent or impractical, why there it will be using a little feeling analyzed that "reasons" itself - that is, closed issue judgments. @ Scotty, solid post nevertheless. I don't actually know any confirmed male INFJ's outside of Internet forums so I can't offer much there. I'm an INFP with Te developed. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. You don't know what I'm talking about. "I am not even arguing. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I have an IQ 173. INFP's have quite a bit more in common with INTP's who are the most "thinking" thinker. So there's quite a few more 4w5 INFPs but slightly more 5 INFJ's. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. The most thinking feeler demonstrates strong social and manipulative abilities [Se-Te] a INTx are very quiet and do not know manipulate and persuade equal ESxP's. I have an IQ 173. From this point there are 2 possibilities :. I'm an INFP with Te developed. And when you learn some skill, you lose another. I think it's much more than "overlapping similaritites" when T is high and well used in INFPs. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I have an IQ 173. I have an IQ 173. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. They use more external rationalizations and can be almost Te-likeINFJ is good at 1st place. No, I certainly have my demonstrate lower functions more developed and healthier than they repress that and do not see the importance of them. I'm sociopath. Ni in itself is a function very precise and accurate, Fe serves to capture the feeling and external Ti to rationalize. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. I'm sociopath. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. The INFP's are more likely to look like INTPs and the INFJs to look like INTJs probably. In my view, the thinking is more a "logical sense" than pure logic to why there is no pure logic in the human brain, for you to decide between 10 reais and a million you need logical and sentimental-emotional part. Alejandro Jodorowsky too. To be honest, I'm trying to apply it in the theory of cognitive functions, but I really think enough on this theory and add to my idea of the four functions, especially tertiary and inferior can become quite revelant in the course of development cognitive. While I don't think there is a big difference between male and female INFPs, male INFJs are note alike their female counterpart. That's why logic or thought is a kind of "rational sense" and the feeling is a kind of "sentimental reason. Leonard Cohen is someone I'm sure of. INTJs are interested in ideas and theories when observing the world.. I do think that feelers can be logical, but if we were to find an explanation to it, it wouldnt be that one. Neuroplasticity works according to practice. Born to be passive and live in a fantasy world. I think those who have good intellectual capacity not think something as pseudoscientific and little prepared as MBTI determines intelligence or IQ. I have an IQ 173. I have an IQ 173. Everyone can reach the same conclusions with their own paths. My close INFJ friend has a bit of a reputation amongst other friends for being fragile. Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding The most thinking feeler Myers-Briggs and personality type!. How about David Lynch. You're trying to detach the rationalization from the feelings to get a archetype of a rational F-dom. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. The former being quite agressive in a way. I Know INFJ's who know and streamline the external environment (Fe-Ti) and can absorb more theories (NiTi), however, xNFP more developed's can prove quite rational if they can be more assertive Fi and Te better trained. I was referring to the similarities between the nature of INTPs and INFPs. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I have an IQ 173. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I'm an INFP with Te developed. People who have feelings can be extremely compassionate and extremely selfish, depending on how are the emotions coherence functions (logic functions). The most thinking feeler demonstrates strong social and manipulative abilities [Se-Te] a INTx are very quiet and do not know manipulate and persuade equal ESxP's. This is just completely my personal experience, but I typically encounter INFJs who are a lot more openly emotional than INFPs. I'm an INFP with Te developed. I'm sociopath. Neuroplasticity needs time to opere. An F-type will not automatically be ethical, to why ethics is not just sentimental category, but logic. If you are typing someone as INFJ over INFP due to having the scholar quality then of course you are going to, due to circular logic, associate INFJ with more of a scholarly "thinking" quality. The point is that INFPs can be as good thinkers as INTPs, for example. Lol to be serious on a superficial level all IN--s are similar. I haven't read much about the other people you mention. Most people have stereotypical view of things, there is a more rational sentimental type than the other and a sentimental type can have intellectual bases much more developed and expressive than many NT's. is obviously an antisocial ESFP that has its shadow INTJ quite exposed. INFP's are not logical and repress the rationale for having lower Te. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. A INFP learning organizational tactics and is trained to be disciplined and learn math and various things on strategy will be to complement the base Fi-Ne with combination Si-Te, viewing tactical possibilities, strategies and objectivism. I do find that INFJs usually have a sort of colder, less dream like exterior to them compared to INFPs which probably looks a bit more "thinker". If people actually believe that Lovecraft is an INFP, then he'd be way more think-y than almost any INFJ you could cite. I think INFPs are more in touch with their feelings and for this reason are able to make sense of them and deal with them with a lot more ease than INFJs. I think Nick Cave is one as well, and I'm also sure of Viggo Mortensen whom I can compare with Cohen easily. I for one workout quite chess, study tactics and strategies, they are psychological factors that can be applied at work and walk becoming quite self-confident, discipline and goal, and obviously I show it more than others INFP's, this means that our functions are developed at the same level. INFJs intellectuals however can detach their intellectual pursuits from their own person, however in their case the intellectual pursuit is in concurrent with their vision etc. He is a more think-y than usual INFJ-ish type. I'm sociopath. On which basis would you relate neuroplasticity to Jungian functions. -He stops to train his Se area because he no longer want/need to use it. Lets suppose that this correlation exist, even in that case i dont see how we can relate it to neuroplasticity to try to explain how we can develop inferiors functions. Its adapatability to environment/situation just like almost every part of the body. Isabel Briggs Myers, a researcher and practitioner of Jung’s theory, proposed to see the judging-perceiving relationship as a fourth dichotomy influencing personality type.. I don't know why type wars is such a thing. 1) There is no pure logic, logic is a kind of "sense of internal or external coherence" that can lead to a person Thinking (T - Thinking) pursue math and facts or an individual logic can stick to inconsistent logic with the world. I think Varg Vikernes is a very unhealthy INFJ. If I study strategy and tatics, I manage myself to achieve development, mean that I stopped being Fi-Ne and I'm using more of my lower functions. INFPs, like most introverts, are quiet and reserved. They prefer not to talk about themselves.. While using his Se area would be quite difficult since the neuronal connections arent well established there. Male INFJs are quite rare indeed, and it would be interesting to see if female INTJs (about as rare) appear as thinky as male INTJs. An INTJ for example would have his Ni area quite developed and easy to use. INFPs can (and often do) have intellectualy heavy interests, but being Fi-doms they never truly leave emotions aside for long. The problem with theory is : no one is obliged to adhere to it. I'm an INFP with Te developed. Applies to all other types. @revolução You have no idea what I'm talking about; with all respect, friend. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about The most thinking feeler MBTI type.. I'm sociopath. This personality type is highly individualistic and Champions strive toward creating their own methods, looks, actions, habits, and ideas!. But all this again is when we assume those kind of specific areas in the brain exists (i havent seen proof of that yet, and i dont think its true anyway). INFP should be close second. I also think 9s can appear just as thinking as 5s in a way. I have an IQ 173. Then this area will start to regress again for the benefit of the Ni's one. Neuroplasticity exists to prove that the brain is constantly developing and functions can be developed, especially the bottom. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I'm an INFP with Te developed. - He continues to train his Se area and with time it develops while the Ni's one becomes less and less developed. But since MBTI is about tendencies, logically your prefered functions are what you use on a natural/daily basis. I'm sociopath. INFP's are not logical and repress the rationale for having lower Te. INTPs are not the only thinker either. Sorry for Spam. I have an IQ 173. All types have overlapping similarities. 2) be F (Feeling - Feeling) is not the same as being nice - feelings can be used to influence positively or negatively environment. I'm sociopath. The most thinking feeler. I can say one thing about the most thinking feeler: not INFJ. I'm sociopath. For them pure logical intellect is harmful and it's here where they are poles apart from INTPs (however some will claim INTP and INFPs are almost similar, they're wrong of course). From my experience (female) INFJ's also don't have a very detached way of dealing with things at all, not any more so than INFPs. How I hate those incompetent INFPs. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Polls characters list.. Still the Fe of the INFJ's makes them look sort of like feelers while the Fi of INFP's is often more of a repressed feeling, which can make them look less feely, and by extension more thinky. You must be a troll who think is funnyYou must be a INFP who think is rational. I've seen here so many self-claimed pseudo-intelectual INFPs. You should not take the INFPS online here as example.