William Shakespeare Myers-Brigs type - MBTI, enneagram and personality type info
Even if not directly tested, public voting can provide good accuracy regarding William Shakespeare Myers-Briggs and personality type!. There are probably people who will want to kill me now, but I think part of the reason he is so timeless is because he brings up all these really deep subjects (Fi), but he doesn't really stay with anything for long enough to truly go into depth (Ne) which allows each time period to find whatever they are looking for in his plays. That makes sense. Discover Array, and more, famous people, fictional characters and celebrities here!. Basically Shakespeare was the greatest fan-fiction writer in history. Or it's maybe a Te efficiency of sorts, realizing he could write more using this method. it seemed like he used Si quite a bit and it was probably not an inferior function. I don't think it's a good indicator to determine his type. Finally, a lot of scholars are impressed on how wide his knowledge was on all kinds of bizarre things someone of his social class shouldn't really know either, etc.
. To one thing constant never. He's like our greatest achivement. And I agree that there's not much evidence for him being a Four; Seven seems more likely. Shakespeare could have actually been an extrovert looking at his business background. Sevens are the storyteller type. It's just that it takes from a lot more sources than Ni generally does and is less predictable, which generally makes it seem a lot more original. Sometimes Ne will seem less original though because it will base itself on something really obscure and specific, which makes the source material very obvious, whereas Ni - though it's usually easier to see where the ideas came from - will prefer archetypal subjects which are considered more fair to steal. Welcome to MBTIBase - PersonalityBase, here you can learn about William Shakespeare MBTI type.. There's the possibility that the actor named Shakespeare wasn't the actual author, but that's another debate in itself. If you enjoyed this entry, find out about the personality types of Writers characters list.. There's something that bothers me about Shakespeare. I think, fundamentally, Ne is likely to do something like this. I don't really know what it is about his writing that seems 4-like, other than that he seems INFP, which is inherently bad case. What is the best option for the MBTI type of William Shakespeare? What about enneagram and other personality types?. I think every xNFP has had the experience of seeing a movie or something - and wishing it had gone a different way and fantasizing about it maybe. His Ne is also obvious by the sheer number of words and saying he contributed to the English language, coming with all kinds of combinations of words is much more of a Ne endeavor. R Martin are often typed as INFP and they wrote so much works. Last, weird argument: A loooot of actors are ENFP, and actors really, really love their Shakespeare. Keep reading to learn more about what goes into your Myers-Briggs personality type—and maybe discover what yours is.. All this sounds very ExxP, in the diversity of his scopes. This adds to my impression of him as this very intense person who is just running up and down London and doing and figuring out everything there is to figure, like David Foster Wallace (ENTP). But like, from what I understand Shakespeare also ran the theater group and lots of stuff like that, which seems kind of heavy and demanding for an INFP while ENFP have Tertiary Te. As an INFP I even feel Shakespeare is a bit "shallow". To recap since my comments was deleted: Ne over Ni because his dramas tend to evolve in multiple directions in a relatively short amount of pages; Fi over Fe because he's esteemed for how he put all kinds of different human emotions and motivations into words and not for pleading for a certain world-view or another. He is not an ne user at all. INTPs are well known for their brilliant theories and unrelenting logic, which makes sense since they are arguably the most logical minded of all the personality types.. That just seems like Ne overload. < sigh no more.
. I think it's a pretty good bet to say INFP over ENFP. But that's the only argument I've got for INFP over ENFP. The changes he made in the stories are also meant to put more emphasis on the character's psychology, such as MacBeth's feeling of guilt, which suggests that for him the characters motivations and inner state were more important than innovation; thus INFP over ENFP. He is ni, read hamlet, in the way it is structured, once an action happens, it is inevitable which suggest se inferior and ti comes out in how he seems to not like how society is not really practicing what they preach and act by emotion so it suggests infj 4w5 5w4Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. Here you can explore of famous people and fictional characters.. No he is not ENFP. And from his works I don't see Fi-dom. His main function was Ne, and from what we know about his life he was an extrovert. The second letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to the preference within the sensing-intuition dimension: “S” stands for sensing and “N” stands for intuition.. for me it comes from Si-ter, not Te-ter. There's also the sheer number of words and sayings he contributed to English culture, and by this extent, the European culture and maybe the world culture. I think it's really hard since we know so little about him for sure, but honestly, I feel like he's ENFP - I just don't like the idea of losing Shakespeare as an INFP, lol. And even Shakespeare's darkest tragedies are generally quite playful and light-hearted in large parts. While the little we know about his life might suggest extroversion and good use of Te (being an actor, having shares in a theatre company), his process is more compatible with higher Si than 4th. While I can definitely see the Si in his main works, based on the little we know about his life, Extroversion and tertiary Te would seem more likely:he was an actor, he was a main shoreholeder to one of the most important theatre companies of his time, and he also find the time to be a prolific dramaturg and a prolific. He is an INFP 4w3 charismatic. INTJs are interested in ideas and theories when observing the world.. So I think Shakespeare is an INFPI only read Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet of him, but his books seems a little more concerned about the internal feelings of the characters rather than the possibilities in the external world (contrary to for example Oscar Wilde who is an obvious ENFP). Interestingly, IIRC Shakespeare is usually portrayed as an ENFP in movies - like in Shakespeare in Love. In this book I'm reading right now about Shakespeare's life, it speaks constantly of how his childhood experiences with theater influenced the themes in his works, and how he constantly played off of myths/archetypes that he came in contact with. So, while I thought INFP from he wrote his works (strong Si loyalty to past material), the little we know about his life suggests ExxP. And be You blithe and bonny, converting all your sounds of woe into HEY NONNNY NONNNNNNNNYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY2 b or not 2 b. Every person’s preference can be found on a spectrum, so just choose the letter you identify with most.. I find it obvious for example in Romeo and Juliet, where Shakespeare describes more the feelings of the characters, the sadness of Romeo and Juliet because of their impossible love, and not so more the context of their love or the situations (the context and the situations seemed approched superficially to me in this book). What I think I'm getting at, lol, is that. Also, as you say, it just seems like a really efficient thing to do. ^^Sigh no more ladies >. I don't think ideals about being original were that important at Shakespeare's time, so he probably took less care to hide his sources than a Ne-user might do today. And what you said about the huge number of works he wrote in a small amout of time does not mean anything, Tolkien and George R. Some of his most important plays (like Macbeth or King Lear) are based on earlier stories that he for the most part simply borrowed, which seems unlikely for someone with suppressed Si, which is more interested in leaving behind previous influences, as Ne suppressing Si is quite antagonistic to working with already established paths. So that might explain why he wasn't bothered by the fact he copied plots, because he was too busy coming with all these clever word plays and such. And look at Doestoievski, the guy wrote so much huge books and he's an INFJ, not an ENFP. Intuitives focus on a more abstract level of thinking; they are more interested in theories, patterns, and explanations. They are often more concerned with the future than the present and are often described as creative. bobnickmad is right. Men were deceivers ever; one foot in sea and one on shore. Also, Shakespeare's works are often very witty and sarcastic, even if they do focus on the internal feelings of the characters. Stop that stereotype, please. The diversity of his play styles and amount of works he wrote led me to type him as a 7w6 rather than a 4w3. A lot of them run businesses and stuff. Then let them Go. :P:'-( How do you explain his plots being mostly reworking of former plays tough. You are in the best place to test MBTI and learn what type William Shakespeare likely is!. He is clearly a novelist who loves interpretation but, in his books, he likes to use analogies, references, inspirations in details. If he was a 4, he was an extremely active and versatile one. I think Ne is actually very derivative. Wouldn't it go against inferior Si. In this site you can find out which of the 16 types this character 'William Shakespeare' belongs to!.
The new website will come out in ~10 days (hopefully before New Year), and meanwhile Im collecting money for the server,
so please excuse the excessive ads for a while. Also Happy Christmas and New Year, although I gotta be working. Thank you for supporting the development!